Re: llvm-9.0 on 10.6.8 shows red -- but it builds

On May 18, 2021, at 04:35, Mojca Miklavec wrote: >>> That probably counts as a bug in the Tcl script that returns the list >>> of subports to be built. >> >> I'm not aware of a bug in that script. > > Do you have any clue or any alternative explanation why llvm-9.0 would > be missing on this

Re: llvm-9.0 on 10.6.8 shows red -- but it builds

> > That probably counts as a bug in the Tcl script that returns the list > > of subports to be built. > > I'm not aware of a bug in that script. Do you have any clue or any alternative explanation why llvm-9.0 would be missing on this list?

Re: llvm-9.0 on 10.6.8 shows red -- but it builds

On May 18, 2021, at 00:53, Mojca Miklavec wrote: > On Tue, 18 May 2021 at 07:15, Ken Cunningham wrote: >> >> People are quoting >> >> the lack of llvm-9.0 for SnowLeopard on macports as a sign of the

Re: llvm-9.0 on 10.6.8 shows red -- but it builds

On 2021-5-18 15:53 , Mojca Miklavec wrote: Sure, there's also a problem that Joshua pointed out that needs addressing, but even that fix wouldn't solve this particular instance. That was just an example of one improvement that could be made. It's been discussed before on the mailing list that

Re: llvm-9.0 on 10.6.8 shows red -- but it builds

On Tue, 18 May 2021 at 07:15, Ken Cunningham wrote: > > People are quoting > > the lack of llvm-9.0 for SnowLeopard on macports as a sign of the demise of > older systems, and it does for some reason show

Re: llvm-9.0 on 10.6.8 shows red -- but it builds

On 2021-5-18 15:15 , Ken Cunningham wrote: People are quoting >  the lack of llvm-9.0 for SnowLeopard on macports as a

llvm-9.0 on 10.6.8 shows red -- but it builds

People are quoting > the lack of llvm-9.0 for SnowLeopard on macports as a sign of the demise of older systems, and it