> On Nov 28, 2021, at 12:30 PM, Ken Cunningham
> wrote:
>
>> Hi,
>>
>> Judging from the version number, port:libcxx ships a version that's long
>> outdated. Is there a reason for that, like it's the latest version that
>> builds on all OS X versions that require the libc++ conversion?
>>
>
> Hi,
>
> Judging from the version number, port:libcxx ships a version that's long
> outdated. Is there a reason for that, like it's the latest version that
> builds on all OS X versions that require the libc++ conversion?
>
> I have a local version that is currently at v8.0.0 on my 10.9.5 syst
Hi,
Judging from the version number, port:libcxx ships a version that's long
outdated. Is there a reason for that, like it's the latest version that builds
on all OS X versions that require the libc++ conversion?
I have a local version that is currently at v8.0.0 on my 10.9.5 system and have
h
