On 2017-06-27, at 2:31 AM, Ryan Schmidt wrote:
> We used to be able to build wine on the buildbot, but we aren't anymore:
>
> https://build.macports.org/builders/ports-10.12_x86_64-builder/builds/32791
>
> The error occurs when installing dependencies, specifically cairo:
This would also be
Hi Vince,
See below.
> On Jun 27, 2017, at 10:57 AM, Vincent wrote:
>
> Vincent (Veence) pushed a commit to branch master
> in repository macports-ports.
>
> https://github.com/macports/macports-ports/commit/3d0aac3095640e42fabc64de06f9e16427d2664f
>
>
Hello all,
I have prepared a small informal write up about the work and challenges
faced till now and posted on my blog [1]. Also, I have already completed my
side of evaluation and submitted on GSoC website.
Looking forward to community reviews.
Regards,
Umesh Singla
[1]:
Hi,
On Tue, Jun 27, 2017 at 01:37:12AM +0200, Rainer Müller wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I created a preliminary version of a linkable web version of our man pages:
>
> https://man.macports.org/port.1.html
Love it!
> If anyone would be willing to contribute a better CSS, that would be
> highly
Hi,
A user of my macstrop ports tree is reporting a conflict I cannot reproduce, at
least not without uninstalling or deactivating lots of ports that I need to
keep online.
Is there some way to get port to behave as if it needs to install everything,
or at least run the Portfiles of all
We used to be able to build wine on the buildbot, but we aren't anymore:
https://build.macports.org/builders/ports-10.12_x86_64-builder/builds/32791
The error occurs when installing dependencies, specifically cairo:
> > Installing dependency (28 of 120) 'glib2' with variants
Ryan Schmidt wrote:
> Maybe if you describe the problem the user is experiencing, we can figure out
> why it's happening without needing to do what you're proposing.
Thanks, I appreciate that.
I'm still trying to figure out what that problem is... From what I know he had
my
port:qt5-kde
On Jun 27, 2017, at 03:39, René J.V. Bertin wrote:
> A user of my macstrop ports tree is reporting a conflict I cannot reproduce,
> at least not without uninstalling or deactivating lots of ports that I need
> to keep online.
>
> Is there some way to get port to behave as if it needs to