Restoring from Time Machine backup relocates home directories

I recently reinstalled macOS and, during the setup process, restored from a Time Machine backup. One would think that after restoration, the machine would be in a state sufficiently similar to the one it was in at backup time, but for our purposes, it is not, specifically with regard to user

Re: Appropriateness for inclusion in MacPorts

Hi, On Tue, Sep 12, 2017 at 12:28:07PM +, Rainer Müller wrote: > As Java applications are mostly self-contained without external > dependencies (no dynamically linked libraries), I guess the approach > to just extract the .zip will work. > > However, I do not know what kind of compatibility

Re: Switching cxx_stdlib for C++11 on legacy macOS (was: Re: [GSoC] migration)

On 4 September 2017 at 14:10, Ryan Schmidt wrote: > On Sep 4, 2017, at 04:25, Mojca Miklavec wrote: >> >> Is there any chance that we could schedule one 30-(max 90) minute long >> IRC meeting to finally settle this issue? At least from the >> philosophical point of view; code itself should be much

Re: Reversing use_bzip2

On 2017-09-14 11:30, Mojca Miklavec wrote: >> Therefore you also need to override these options: >> >> use_xz yes >> distfiles gcc-${version}.tar.xz:gcc >> extract.onlygcc-${version}.tar.xz >> >> To make this easier for the gcc ports, we could pass the suffix to >> crossgcc.setup as

Re: Some opinions on whether there be a guile20 port?

> > geda-gaf > The other broken port(s) can no doubt be patched too. > > Actually, it looks like upgrading geda-gaf to use guile 2.2.2 may not be so easy after all. It may be stuck using guile 2.0.14 for some while. K

Re: Reversing use_bzip2

On 13 September 2017 at 15:42, Rainer Müller wrote: > On 2017-09-13 11:48, Mojca Miklavec wrote: >> When trying to update x86_64-w64-mingw32-gcc I noticed that GCC 7.2 no >> longer provides bzip2 sources, but I'm not sure how to tell the >> Portfile that it should use xz instead of bzip2 given