If they can't be installed at the same time, LibXML should probably be a
variant.
On Sun, Mar 10, 2019 at 8:13 PM MacPorts
wrote:
> I don't remember why I ended up making a new port for html-tree.
>
> There seem to be two different modules at cpan that use the name
> Web::Scraper. One uses
I don't remember why I ended up making a new port for html-tree.
There seem to be two different modules at cpan that use the name
Web::Scraper. One uses Web::Scraper::LibXML. The port I created includes
the module that uses Web::Scraper::LibXML.
Carl.
On 3/10/19 6:51 PM, Blair Zajac wrote:
>
I think a number of these already exist:
$ port list \*html-tree
p5-html-tree @5.70.0 perl/p5-html-tree
p5.24-html-tree@5.70.0 perl/p5-graveyard
p5.26-html-tree@5.70.0 perl/p5-html-tree
p5.28-html-tree
Putting the port name there would help get people to look at them, if they are
interested in that port. Otherwise, it’s a lot of clicking through...
> On Mar 10, 2019, at 9:52 AM, MacPorts wrote:
>
> I submitted 9 new Portfiles about a week ago. Would someone please review
> these.
>
Dear Carl,
Submitting patches via Trac is perfectly fine and a valid option, I
just wanted to say that submitting a PR makes it much more visible,
easier to review, test and more likely to be merged (orders of
magnitude?) faster.
I would make a single pull request with 9 commits, one for each
Dear Ryan,
On Mon, 24 Sep 2018 at 10:22, Ryan Schmidt wrote:
>
> I have a port for installing SDKs which I will finish up and submit as a PR.
> Here is the preliminary port:
>
> https://github.com/ryandesign/macports-ports/blob/MacOSX.sdk/devel/MacOSX.sdk/Portfile
Any news about that? I would
