Re: Call for designers for our ports website

> On Jun 13, 2020, at 2:24 PM, Arjun Salyan wrote: > > Thank you for the mockup and the inputs. > > http://macports.silentfox.tech/port/gnuplot/stats/?days=365 > my version of > it does not look as good as yours probably due to a

Re: Call for designers for our ports website

Thank you for the mockup and the inputs. http://macports.silentfox.tech/port/gnuplot/stats/?days=365 my version of it does not look as good as yours probably due to a larger amount of data. Thank you

Re: Call for designers for our ports website

sorry —we’re 835 openssl installs. wrong drop-down. K > On Jun 13, 2020, at 8:56 AM, Ken Cunningham > wrote: > > No doubt it caused some tempest. > > I was wrong, homebrew’s published stats say they have 5 million openssl > installs this year

Re: Call for designers for our ports website

No doubt it caused some tempest. I was wrong, homebrew’s published stats say they have 5 million openssl installs this year > and our analytics say we have 547

Re: Call for designers for our ports website

Hi y'all, I was a core Homebrew maintainer at the time they added analytics. Just want to say that Saagar is right; there were a *lot* of Homebrew users who did in fact have a problem with it. Cheers, Andrwe On 6/12/20 9:03 PM, Saagar Jha wrote: > I believe the lack of change there is almost

Re: Call for designers for our ports website

> On Jun 12, 2020, at 10:30 PM, Arjun Salyan wrote: > > Hi Craig, > > Thank you. You make a valid point regarding the possible distortion due to > weekly submissions being bundled to calculate monthly charts. > > But what we are seeing here is a known issue with the query that calculates >