Hi Ryan,
On Sat, Mar 23, 2024 at 11:19:03PM -0500, Ryan Schmidt wrote:
On Mar 23, 2024, at 23:00, Zero King wrote:
I think it could be base's sandbox that prevented writes to the home directory,
where SwiftPM stores its cache.
If disabling sandboxing in macports.conf makes it work
Hi,
As I try to package the latest commit of poedit, I encountered the
following error:
Failed to determine if database is empty or not: Error Domain=NSCocoaErrorDomain Code=513 "You don’t have
permission to save the file “org.swift.swiftpm” in the folder “Caches”."
Hi Perry,
On Fri, Nov 17, 2017 at 08:40:49AM +0100, Mojca Miklavec wrote:
(2) Insist in installing separate ocaml-* packages as individual ports
and mostly ignoring what "opam" does (apart from maybe providing a
port for it). Note that we do have tools like "cpan2port" and
"pip2port" that help
Hi,
On Tue, Jun 01, 2021 at 02:57:47AM +0100, Chris Jones wrote:
Hi all,
I have noticed in the github pipeline builds whilst they appear to be green, if
you delve into the logs they are failing due to fetch errors installing
dependencies. See e.g. the builds for
On Mon, Apr 19, 2021 at 01:24:51PM +0200, Mojca Miklavec wrote:
On Mon, 19 Apr 2021 at 12:45, Steven Smith wrote:
If a comparable announcement to this was made for MacPorts, I missed it:
On Fri, Nov 27, 2020 at 10:27:09PM +0100, Clemens Lang wrote:
Hi,
On Fri, Nov 27, 2020 at 04:24:01PM +, Zero King wrote:
[...]
Sure. Let's do it before end of the year. I'll see what I can do about
the build log comment, but GitHub Actions IPs have to be whitelisted
on paste.macports.org
On Mon, Nov 02, 2020 at 08:14:17PM +0100, Mojca Miklavec wrote:
Hi,
If I understand correctly, we'll soon be unable to run any builds on
Travis unless we pay for it (they are gradually moving existing
customers to the new billing plan, so it's just a matter of time):
On Tue, Nov 17, 2020 at 02:09:11AM +, Christopher Jones wrote:
Hi,
Is anyone else having problems installing tarballs from the new Darwin20
builedbot ?
Yes, see https://trac.macports.org/ticket/61500.
Oberon-macOS-11 ~/Projects/MacPorts/ports > sudo port -v install llvm-9.0
--->
On Tue, Sep 08, 2020 at 10:12:08PM +0200, Mojca Miklavec wrote:
On Tue, 8 Sep 2020 at 20:49, Zero King wrote:
> I forgot why we never switched from Azure to GitHub Actions.
Done in commit db7b40d8691e1fcd8b6be5e3c2a2a00a7ce0bdf4. We should
remove Travis CI and Azure Pipelines soon.
Awes
Hello,
On Tue, Sep 08, 2020 at 06:39:41PM +0200, Mojca Miklavec wrote:
On Mon, 7 Sep 2020 at 20:25, Ralph Seichter wrote:
If you ignore Travis results, why run Travis CI in the first place?
Travis was the first CI that we supported for pull requests.
@l2dy wrote the initial support as a GSOC
On Sat, Jul 25, 2020 at 01:38:58PM -0700, Ken Cunningham wrote:
There are ancient PRs that are never going to be committed in the queue.
This is just noise, and prevents us from keeping things moving.
The people who opened them seem attached to them, but they are clearly dead and
need to be
CC mailing lists.
On Sun, Aug 18, 2019 at 01:58:36PM +, Zero King wrote:
Hi Rainer,
On Sat, Aug 17, 2019 at 11:45:06AM +0200, Rainer Müller wrote:
Hello,
according to monitoring, braeburn went down at 2019-08-17 06:10 UTC for an
unknown reason. When I noticed the downtime, I was unable
On Thu, Aug 08, 2019 at 08:59:46PM +0200, Rainer Müller wrote:
On 04/08/2019 17.34, Ryan Schmidt wrote:
On Aug 1, 2019, at 10:50, Blair Zajac wrote:
Why Azure?
We already use Azure to test pull requests, but we test against the released
version of MacPorts base, currently 2.5.4. I guess
On Sat, Jun 22, 2019 at 07:53:53AM +0200, Mojca Miklavec wrote:
Hi,
I wonder if the owner of macports.zulip.org is on this mailing list.
macports.zulip.org doesn't seem to exist, but I'm the admin of
https://macports.zulipchat.com/.
Thank you,
Mojca
--
Zero
On Wed, May 01, 2019 at 12:30:18PM +, Zero King wrote:
On Wed, May 01, 2019 at 10:19:53AM +0100, Chris Jones wrote:
Hi,
I've noticed over the last day or so the azure checks in PRs are
consistently failing, e.g.
https://github.com/macports/macports-ports/pull/4225
https://github.com
On Wed, May 01, 2019 at 10:19:53AM +0100, Chris Jones wrote:
Hi,
I've noticed over the last day or so the azure checks in PRs are
consistently failing, e.g.
https://github.com/macports/macports-ports/pull/4225
https://github.com/macports/macports-ports/pull/4224
On Sat, Mar 23, 2019 at 12:30:36PM -0500, Ryan Schmidt wrote:
On Mar 23, 2019, at 04:45, Christopher Jones wrote:
Also, it makes no sense the travis builds timeout - The build should not take
anything close to 50mins - and again these builds seem to offer no explanation
in any log I can
Hi,
Google recently announced Season of Docs[1], "a new program which
fosters the open source contributions of technical writers".
Organization applications open on April 2, 2019 at 20:00 UTC[2], should
we apply for this chance to improve our documentation?
[1]
On Mon, Feb 25, 2019 at 08:53:12PM +0100, Rainer Müller wrote:
Hello,
if you are using Gmail or a Google hosted mail service for your domain,
your subscription to the macports-changes mailing list was likely
disabled on 2019-02-22 by mailman due to "excessive or fatal bounces".
If you still
On Sun, Feb 10, 2019 at 02:26:14AM +0100, Eric F (iEFdev) wrote:
Hi,
I had this idea I want to test here. When creating a Portfile and adding:
maintainers - only GitHub is recognized when adding a username like “@fooBar”.
One *could* cheat and use:
In Portfile: maintainers{GitHost:\
On Sun, Feb 03, 2019 at 04:59:57PM +0100, Mojca Miklavec wrote:
Dear Zero,
Last time you asked for feature requests for our bot :)
Here are some from me:
- I would like to see the same kind of user-friendly report from Azure
as we get from Travis.
I'll try. Azure Pipelines doesn't provide an
On Fri, Feb 01, 2019 at 06:11:16PM -0600, Ryan Schmidt wrote:
On Feb 1, 2019, at 15:30, Michael Dickens wrote:
OK yes we -offer- multiple versions, but only one version can be installed at a
time right now.
No, if you install boost without the no_single variant, you will get both the
On Sat, Oct 27, 2018 at 08:53:55PM -0400, Mark Anderson wrote:
I got this:
github PortGroup: Error: ${worksrcpath} does not exist after extracting
distfiles. This might indicate that the author or project is different than
set in the Portfile due to a rename at GitHub. Please examine the
On Tue, Oct 23, 2018 at 08:05:21PM +0200, Rainer Müller wrote:
On 2018-10-23 12:18, Zero King wrote:
GitHub now supports verifying organization's domain[1], and Homebrew
verified their brew.sh[2]. Should we verify ours too?
macports.org is now verified for the MacPorts organization.
Thanks
Hi,
GitHub now supports verifying organization's domain[1], and Homebrew
verified their brew.sh[2]. Should we verify ours too?
[1] https://help.github.com/articles/verifying-your-organization-s-domain/
[2] https://github.com/Homebrew
--
Zero
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic
On Mon, Oct 15, 2018 at 02:16:48PM +0100, Chris Jones wrote:
Hi,
[...]
If these sorts of things aren't okay to merge pretty quickly, then
why do we have an openmaintainer designation at all? I mean, if
there's really no distinction in how you treat an openmaintainer and
a non-openmaintainer
On Mon, Oct 15, 2018 at 09:58:59AM +0100, Chris Jones wrote:
Hi,
On 15/10/18 06:41, Joshua Root wrote:
I agree with the points in Mojca's first message in the thread.
On 2018-10-15 09:20 , Mojca Miklavec wrote:
On Mon, 15 Oct 2018 at 00:10, Blair Zajac wrote:
We could add a rule that
On Fri, Sep 07, 2018 at 03:26:21PM +0200, Mojca Miklavec wrote:
Dear Zero,
Would you be willing to implement exclusion of obsolete ports and
portgroups from Travis builds?
Please review https://github.com/macports/mpbb/pull/7 then. Please don't
merge it though, I'd rather push it directly
On Fri, May 25, 2018 at 11:14:51PM +0200, Clemens Lang wrote:
Hi,
On Fri, May 25, 2018 at 04:50:48PM +0200, Rainer Müller wrote:
in our last meeting, we scheduled the next meeting to be tomorrow,
2018-05-26 13:00 UTC. However, this seems to have fallen off the
radar, because we have not set
Hi,
On Thu, May 10, 2018 at 03:58:11PM +1000, Joshua Root wrote:
Source code and pkgs for MacPorts 2.5.0-beta1 are now
available [1]. Testing of either of these install methods is helpful.
Now that 2.5.0 is released, we should protect the release-2.5 branch in
macports-base to disable force
On Fri, May 25, 2018 at 02:05:00PM -0500, Ryan Schmidt wrote:
On May 25, 2018, at 12:57, Zero King wrote:
On Thu, May 17, 2018 at 11:36:39PM +1000, Joshua Root wrote:
It's been a week with no new tickets filed against base. I'll give it
one more week and then, if nothing comes up, tag
Hi,
On Thu, May 17, 2018 at 11:36:39PM +1000, Joshua Root wrote:
It's been a week with no new tickets filed against base. I'll give it
one more week and then, if nothing comes up, tag a release candidate.
- Josh
I tried the rc1, and unar is now "broken". How can I fix it?
unar is using
On Fri, May 11, 2018 at 12:07:38PM -0500, Ryan Schmidt wrote:
On May 10, 2018, at 20:37, Zero King wrote:
Zero King (l2dy) pushed a commit to branch master
in repository macports-ports.
https://github.com/macports/macports-ports/commit/5836a5624ac40d04cb12a73c4ef219c377100a16
commit
On Tue, May 08, 2018 at 02:24:41PM +0200, Rainer Müller wrote:
Please join us in welcoming the following new MacPorts project member:
- Vishnu M (vishnu, @Vishnum98)
We look forward to continued excellent contributions during Google
Summer of Code 2018 and beyond.
- Joshua, Ryan, and Rainer
by extracting
https://packages.macports.org/poedit/poedit-2.0.7_0.darwin_15.x86_64.tbz2
is also useful for some users.
Rainer
[1] https://trac.macports.org/ticket/43772
On 2018-05-08 05:38, Zero King wrote:
Zero King (l2dy) pushed a commit to branch master
in repository macports-ports.
https
On Mon, May 07, 2018 at 08:41:30AM -0400, Perry E. Metzger wrote:
When pull requests come in, users are asked to fill out a short
checklist. I'd like to add a reminder to squash your commits into it
-- this has become a frequent issue with pull requests from new
contributors.
I think we should
On Thu, May 03, 2018 at 08:51:49AM +0200, Mojca Miklavec wrote:
On 1 May 2018 at 16:11, Rainer Müller wrote:
The guide uses "Portfile-rrdtool.diff" as an example filename [1]. Some
users seem to take that literally and submit patches with that name.
[1]
On Mon, Apr 30, 2018 at 06:09:09PM +0200, Rainer Müller wrote:
On 2018-04-30 15:49, Perry E. Metzger wrote:
Sometimes, I've noticed, PRs in the queue don't get automatically
labeled as expected. See this one, for example:
https://github.com/macports/macports-ports/pull/1687
Anyone know why?
Hi,
I'd like to mirror unar's distfile for backup, but "it has already been
built and uploaded" so mirror was skipped if I force build the port on a
portwatcher and I can't force a mirror job directly.
--
Zero
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature
Hi,
On Sat, Dec 09, 2017 at 09:12:10AM -0800, Ken Cunningham wrote:
will put in a reminder to do so
thanks, K
Here goes a reminder, the base bug was fixed in MacPorts 2.4.3.
On Dec 9, 2017, at 8:50 AM, Ryan Schmidt wrote:
On Dec 9, 2017, at 10:07, Ryan Schmidt
On Mon, Apr 30, 2018 at 10:18:51AM -0400, Perry E. Metzger wrote:
On:
https://trac.macports.org/wiki/Tickets
I see a list of tickets assigned to me, but it includes closed
tickets. When I edit the Wiki page, it shows me the query is:
On Fri, Apr 27, 2018 at 09:59:59PM -0400, Perry E. Metzger wrote:
So I tried to do some repo surgery to fix Marcus Calhoun-Lopez's
commits, since there were only two commits after his change.
I "git reset --hard" back past where he damaged the repo, cherry
picked the two revisions after that,
On Wed, Apr 25, 2018 at 09:16:08PM -0500, Ryan Schmidt wrote:
On Apr 25, 2018, at 20:07, Zero King wrote:
On Wed, Apr 25, 2018 at 11:47:21AM -0500, Ryan Schmidt wrote:
On Apr 25, 2018, at 11:23, Chris Jones wrote:
I don't think there is any need to re-invent our own system here
On Wed, Apr 25, 2018 at 11:47:21AM -0500, Ryan Schmidt wrote:
On Apr 25, 2018, at 11:23, Chris Jones wrote:
I don't think there is any need to re-invent our own system here. There is an
already standard why of dong this, which is to declare the request as 'Work In
Progress'. This is
other places where we currently describe the
process to submit new ports or updates to old ones? It would be good
to update those as well.
In our guide: https://guide.macports.org/#project.contributing /
https://github.com/macports/macports-guide.
--
Best regards,
Zero King
smime.p7s
Descrip
build completes).
The CI system is useful because it can provide more information when we
review the PRs. It would be less useful if we have to manually start the
builds.
--
Best regards,
Zero King
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature
/tclFCmd.c#L415
@l2dy,
Is our Travis job executing multiple 'port lint' commands in parallel?
Then this is the same cause.
Not multiple lint commands, but lint and building ports (including
listing subports) are executed in parallel.
Rainer
--
Best regards,
Zero King
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME
) so it's not ideal to keep it in
the ports tree.
You should probably manually apply the patches
first to see if it breaks the build or fixes the issue. I would not blindly
apply any Linux patch.
On Sun, Mar 18, 2018 at 00:34 Zero King <l...@macports.org> wrote:
Hi,
Port w3m needs p
On Sun, Mar 18, 2018 at 12:48:59PM +0100, Rainer Müller wrote:
On 2018-03-18 12:28, Zero King wrote:
On Sun, Mar 18, 2018 at 09:57:58AM +0100, Mojca Miklavec wrote:
On 18 March 2018 at 08:33, Zero King wrote:
I would add the patches to distfiles and include debian site in
master_sites. You
On Sun, Mar 18, 2018 at 09:57:58AM +0100, Mojca Miklavec wrote:
On 18 March 2018 at 08:33, Zero King wrote:
Hi,
Port w3m needs patches from Debian to fix security issues. Currently,
the patches are added to the ports tree and takes ~800KiB. Since its
size will grow, I'd prefer to fetch
}/.../020_debian.patch to
distfiles and patchfiles, but that didn't work because port(1) attempted
to fetch the patchfiles into ${distpath} and `DEBUG: Fetching distfile
failed: No such file or directory`.
--
Best regards,
Zero King
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature
On Sat, Mar 10, 2018 at 10:33:55PM -0600, Ryan Schmidt wrote:
On Mar 10, 2018, at 09:52, Zero King wrote:
Zero King (l2dy) pushed a change to branch travis-ci
in repository macports-base.
discard 18e31dc Update bintray deploy key
new b13450e Update bintray deploy key
This update added
On Tue, Mar 06, 2018 at 04:08:04AM -0600, Ryan Schmidt wrote:
On Mar 3, 2018, at 20:59, Zero King wrote:
Zero King (l2dy) pushed a commit to branch master
in repository macports-ports.
https://github.com/macports/macports-ports/commit/9f045bef9d96ad58591bcb71dbf2fc3a67303f82
The following
and traced builds can be done on Travis as well.
Mojca
--
Best regards,
Zero King
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature
On Sun, Feb 25, 2018 at 05:28:26AM +, Zero King wrote:
On Sat, Feb 24, 2018 at 08:26:41PM -0800, Ken Cunningham wrote:
I have tried several times to resolve the minor conflict in this PR and I just
keep messing it up. It looks super trivial, but ...
https://github.com/macports/macports
ua/qt4-mac/Portfile
git commit --amend --no-edit
git push -f g...@github.com:devernay/macports-ports.git pr-740:qt4-mac-tiger
```
I'm using a shallow clone so I can't push to an outdated branch, but it
should work for you.
Thanks,
Ken
--
Best regards,
Zero King
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cry
On Sun, Feb 18, 2018 at 11:06:06PM -0600, Ryan Schmidt wrote:
On Feb 18, 2018, at 22:41, Zero King wrote:
On Sun, Feb 18, 2018 at 10:31:42PM -0600, Ryan Schmidt wrote:
On 17 February 2018 at 16:10, Eitan Adler wrote:
On 17 February 2018 at 13:00, Ryan Schmidt wrote:
On Feb 17, 2018, at 14
On Sun, Feb 18, 2018 at 11:06:06PM -0600, Ryan Schmidt wrote:
On Feb 18, 2018, at 22:41, Zero King wrote:
On Sun, Feb 18, 2018 at 10:31:42PM -0600, Ryan Schmidt wrote:
On 17 February 2018 at 16:10, Eitan Adler wrote:
On 17 February 2018 at 13:00, Ryan Schmidt wrote:
On Feb 17, 2018, at 14
r by doing it themselves. (The same applies to committing
patches submitted in tickets, of course.)
--
Best regards,
Zero King
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature
ou can
force push to the PR source branch. See
https://trac.macports.org/wiki/WorkingWithGit#WorkingwithsomeoneelsespullrequestthroughitsID
and https://gist.github.com/l2dy/7da9621954ebcf1a19869f391662a41e for
some instructions.
--
Best regards,
Zero King
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptog
Hi,
Our 10.13 builder on build.macports.org is failing with:
twisted.spread.pb.RemoteError: [Errno 23] Too many open files in system:
'/opt/bblocal/var/buildworker/ports/ports-10_13_x86_64-watcher'
--
Best regards,
Zero King
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature
that over a long period of time.
Perry
--
Perry E. Metzger pe...@piermont.com
--
Best regards,
Zero King
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature
is a ticket for this, but it has stalled for a long time:
https://trac.macports.org/ticket/15712.
--
Best regards,
Zero King
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature
tible OS X version"
}
}
Perry
--
Perry E. Metzgerpe...@piermont.com
--
Best regards,
Zero King
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature
to not force users to go through
rev-upgrade hell an additional time.
Acknowledged. I did notice and that's why I opened a ticket instead of a
pull request.
--
Best regards,
Zero King
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature
-extensions.html#reference.tcl-extensions.strsed
--
Best regards,
Zero King
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature
if this is even possible)
Fix proposed in https://github.com/macports/macports-ports/pull/1004.
Not sure if this is the best solution though.
--
Best regards,
Zero King
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature
uot; style, not the
usual MacPorts "patch -p0" style. It's easy to convert between them, but
will generally be a pain if a lot of files have been changed. My git-foo
isn't very strong, but these I know & they work quite well for fixing
MacPorts ports via source.
`git diff --no-prefix` genera
Hi,
Did you trigger a force build [1] on the wrong builder? I started
another one [2] on 10.13.
[1] https://build.macports.org/builders/ports-10.12_x86_64-watcher/builds/8476
[2] https://build.macports.org/builders/ports-10.13_x86_64-watcher/builds/427
--
Best regards,
Zero King
smime.p7s
for macports-ports whenever new
commits are pushed to that branch.
I'm quite satisfied with what I've accomplished and I couldn't have done
it without all your help. Thank you, my GSoC mentors and everyone who
joined the discussions on IRC and the mailing list.
--
Best regards,
Zero King
smime.p7s
--
Best regards,
Zero King
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature
,
Zero King
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature
, but what syntax to use instead?
Rainer
[1]
https://github.com/macports/macports-ports/blob/master/.github/PULL_REQUEST_TEMPLATE.md
--
Best regards,
Zero King
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature
curity | Port: mariadb-10.1
--+--
--
Ticket URL: <https://trac.macports.org/ticket/54594>
MacPorts <https://www.macports.org/>
Ports system for macOS
--
Best regards,
Zero King
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature
On Wed, Aug 09, 2017 at 04:16:34AM -0500, Ryan Schmidt wrote:
On Aug 9, 2017, at 04:08, Zero King wrote:
Zero King (l2dy) pushed a commit to branch master
in repository macports-ports.
https://github.com/macports/macports-ports/commit/11e25ff61c68e3cedd4e9109574b38008ed24378
The following
On Thu, Jul 27, 2017 at 07:56:27PM +0200, Clemens Lang wrote:
Hi,
On Thu, Jul 27, 2017 at 01:51:31AM +, Zero King wrote:
I prefer using a separate repository (only containing .travis.yml and
maybe patches, not MacPorts source) because I can update the binaries
by creating a new release
if all our committers set this visibility
to public, the label would be useless. So, should I add it to the PR bot
or simply ask our members to make their membership public?
--
Best regards,
Zero King
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature
On Wed, Jul 26, 2017 at 06:19:16PM +0200, Clemens Lang wrote:
Hi,
- On 25 Jul, 2017, at 17:27, Rainer Müller rai...@macports.org wrote:
On 2017-07-22 13:26, Zero King wrote:
In [1], I patched MacPorts in an attempt to fix a bug (port(1) failed
randomly on Travis). As it seems
commit (MacPorts version can be read from tag
name) and keep the setup for ports CI away from macports-base (they
aren't related IMHO). Any suggestion?
Regards,
Jackson Isaac
--
Best regards,
Zero King
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature
a new release in macports-base (e.g. when new releases of macOS
become available on Travis).
[1]:
https://github.com/macports-staging/macports-base/commit/282e498ac51ba40bdfd43008ce430ca20a7d54ce#diff-d7db55f70d83fc9dba4ef14de9febe71
--
Best regards,
Zero King
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME
ppreciated.
Afterwards, I'll implement graceful shutdown or journaling (in a
database). I'll try to implement sending emails but I might work on the
review event handler first. The functions of the bots are described in
https://github.com/l2dy/mpbot-design.
--
Best regards,
Zero King
Don't trust the Fr
but this is now
solved.
I also gained access to one of our servers last week and will deploy the
PR bot for macports-staging first.
I will implement the webhook receiver in the PR bot next week. Then I
will focus on presenting maintainer information in PRs first as Mojca
suggested.
--
Best regards,
Zero King
On Sun, Jul 02, 2017 at 02:41:55AM +, Zero King wrote:
Except when it's a fast-forward merge, Travis would not fetch the
commits in the PR. It only fetches the merge commit and some more
commits in master.
Except for a fast-forward merge, ...
--
Best regards,
Zero King
Don't trust
the output for "Failed to parse file" and ignore
broken Portfiles not touched by the PR like this one
Failed to parse file python/py-pydot/Portfile: can't read "_name": no such
variable
in https://travis-ci.org/macports/macports-ports/jobs/248896726.
Mojca
--
Best regards,
Ze
On Sat, Jul 01, 2017 at 07:51:12AM +0200, Mojca Miklavec wrote:
I tried to figure out where you call (anything that calls) portindex,
but no luck :).
https://github.com/macports/macports-ports/blob/master/_ci/bootstrap.sh#L18
--
Best regards,
Zero King
Don't trust the From address
/opt/local/bin/g-ir-annotation-tool already exists and does not belong to a
registered port. Unable to activate port gobject-introspection. Use 'port -f
activate gobject-introspection' to force the activation.
--
Best regards,
Zero King
Don't trust the From address.
smime.p7s
Descripti
On Mon, Jun 19, 2017 at 08:35:46PM -0500, Ryan Schmidt wrote:
On Jun 19, 2017, at 20:34, Zero King wrote:
On Mon, Jun 19, 2017 at 08:31:16PM -0500, Ryan Schmidt wrote:
I understand why I got the email. I don't understand why we have a repository
for getopt when we are not the developers
bot that notifies
maintainers and adds labels to PRs. Code will be pushed to the
mpbot-github repository in macports-staging too.
--
Best regards,
Zero King
Don't trust the From address.
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature
On Mon, Jun 05, 2017 at 02:08:20PM +0200, Rainer Müller wrote:
On 2017-06-05 03:17, Zero King wrote:
All information CI bot have access to is public, so I'm worried that
someone would send PR bot data without submitting a PR at all.
Make the PR bot pull data from Travis. The CI bot then only
d these data be sent to and
sanitized by the PR bot.
Rainer
[1] https://docs.travis-ci.com/user/environment-variables/
[2]
https://docs.travis-ci.com/user/pull-requests/#Pull-Requests-and-Security-Restrictions
[3]
https://developer.github.com/v3/activity/events/types/#pullrequestreviewevent
-
On Sun, Jun 04, 2017 at 10:23:52PM +0200, Mojca Miklavec wrote:
Dear Zero King,
Thank you very much for the update.
There's one thing I didn't fully understand:
https://github.com/l2dy/mpbot-design/blob/master/cibot.md#interaction-with-ci-bot
"This design is aimed for traceability, w
/mpbot-design,
but the code is not functional yet so I'm not sharing it for now.
My schedule next week is to finish `port install` testing in the CI bot
and publish its code.
--
Best regards,
Zero King
Don't trust the From address.
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature
unless it's a fast-forward merge.
I'm not sure if we should keep all these on a single wiki page. It would
be really lengthy.
--
Best regards,
Zero King
Don't trust the From address.
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature
On Wed, May 31, 2017 at 10:38:45AM -0400, Craig Treleaven wrote:
On May 31, 2017, at 8:52 AM, Zero King <l...@macports.org> wrote:
I wrote a Gist about making changes to PRs, feedback via email is
welcome. https://gist.github.com/l2dy/7da9621954ebcf1a19869f391662a41e
I currently kno
/7da9621954ebcf1a19869f391662a41e
--
Best regards,
Zero King
Don't trust the From address.
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature
On Sun, May 21, 2017 at 09:59:28PM -0500, Ryan Schmidt wrote:
On May 21, 2017, at 21:50, Zero King <l...@macports.org> wrote:
Yes. For LibreSSL users libtls.dylib already exists so libtls won't be
installed with this variant and for OpenSSL users libtls can be
installed. Most users a
On Sun, May 21, 2017 at 09:24:50PM -0500, Ryan Schmidt wrote:
On May 21, 2017, at 21:23, Zero King <l...@macports.org> wrote:
On Sun, May 21, 2017 at 09:14:10PM -0500, Ryan Schmidt wrote:
Why does this https variant default to libressl (while allowing openssl), when
other ports d
regards,
Zero King
Don't trust the From address.
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature
release.
I've done that in
https://github.com/macports-staging/macports-base/blob/master/.travis.yml.
Does anyone have a list of packages to install on Ubuntu Trusty to run
MacPorts? This would save some test builds for Travis.
--
Best regards,
Zero King
Don't trust the From address.
smime.p7s
Hi,
I've updated the PR adding a LICENSE file to macports-ports
(https://github.com/macports/macports-ports/pull/287). Please review.
--
Best regards,
Zero King
Don't trust the From address.
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature
1 - 100 of 115 matches
Mail list logo