On May 23, 2020, at 08:14, Craig Treleaven wrote:
> On May 23, 2020, at 12:39 AM, Ryan Schmidt wrote:
>
>> On May 22, 2020, at 09:52, Craig Treleaven wrote:
>>
>>> I’m working on a new port and was using the fsdb port as a model. Oddly,
>>> when a non-default variant is selected, it seems
> On May 23, 2020, at 12:39 AM, Ryan Schmidt wrote:
>
> On May 22, 2020, at 09:52, Craig Treleaven wrote:
>
>> I’m working on a new port and was using the fsdb port as a model. Oddly,
>> when a non-default variant is selected, it seems the perl portgroup still
>> adds a dependency on the
On May 22, 2020, at 09:52, Craig Treleaven wrote:
> I’m working on a new port and was using the fsdb port as a model. Oddly,
> when a non-default variant is selected, it seems the perl portgroup still
> adds a dependency on the default perl version. In the case of fsdb, the
> default
I’m working on a new port and was using the fsdb port as a model. Oddly, when
a non-default variant is selected, it seems the perl portgroup still adds a
dependency on the default perl version. In the case of fsdb, the default
variant is +perl5_28:
$ port info --variants --depends_lib fsdb
