Re: Using qt59 instead of qt5 (latest release)

> On Apr 4, 2018, at 9:54 AM, Vincent Habchi wrote: > > Hey Craig, > >> I am considering a similar move for mythtv.28. > > […] > > Thanks for that useful info. French has a saying which goes like this (more > or less, it’s difficult to translate): “The best is

Re: Using qt59 instead of qt5 (latest release)

Hey Craig, > I am considering a similar move for mythtv.28. […] Thanks for that useful info. French has a saying which goes like this (more or less, it’s difficult to translate): “The best is oftentimes the good’s enemy”. In any case, yeah, I suppose this will mean at least writing variants.

Re: Using qt59 instead of qt5 (latest release)

> On Apr 4, 2018, at 8:33 AM, Vincent Habchi wrote: > > Hi there, > > I recently wanted to experiment with linking one of the ports I maintain > (Qgis3) with QT 5.9, if only to find out if 5.10 wasn’t the source of all the > glitches and crashes everyone experiences with

Using qt59 instead of qt5 (latest release)

Hi there, I recently wanted to experiment with linking one of the ports I maintain (Qgis3) with QT 5.9, if only to find out if 5.10 wasn’t the source of all the glitches and crashes everyone experiences with that application. However, in order to do so, I’d have to rebuild several dependents