Re: cxx11 1.0 PG -> mass change to cxx11 1.1 ?

2018-02-04 Thread Ryan Schmidt
On Feb 4, 2018, at 09:29, Ken Cunningham wrote: > I think it's time to consider a mass change of any ports that remain on the > old cxx11 1.0 PG to the new cxx11 1.1 PG. > > Any thoughts? I haven't heard of any reports that what we're doing in the cxx11 1.1 portgroup isn't working. So it's

cxx11 1.0 PG -> mass change to cxx11 1.1 ?

2018-02-04 Thread Ken Cunningham
I think it's time to consider a mass change of any ports that remain on the old cxx11 1.0 PG to the new cxx11 1.1 PG. Any thoughts? Ken