Re: Objection to restoring deprecated Python subports

2016-10-20 Thread Peter Danecek
> On 18 Oct 2016, at 06:47, Lawrence Velázquez wrote: > > Fred Wright recently opened several tickets that suggest restoring > several Python subports that were deprecated and moved to the Python > graveyard a long time ago. > > https://trac.macports.org/ticket/52636 >

Re: Objection to restoring deprecated Python subports

2016-10-18 Thread Sean Farley
Lawrence Velázquez writes: > Fred Wright recently opened several tickets that suggest restoring > several Python subports that were deprecated and moved to the Python > graveyard a long time ago. > > https://trac.macports.org/ticket/52636 >

Re: Objection to restoring deprecated Python subports

2016-10-18 Thread mf2k
> On Oct 18, 2016, at 12:43 AM, David Evans wrote: > > On 10/17/16 9:47 PM, Lawrence Velázquez wrote: >> Fred Wright recently opened several tickets that suggest restoring >> several Python subports that were deprecated and moved to the Python >> graveyard a long time ago.

Re: Objection to restoring deprecated Python subports

2016-10-18 Thread Ryan Schmidt
> On Oct 18, 2016, at 3:04 AM, Andrea D'Amore wrote: > > Should less-maintained ports be removed as it's being suggested > for old python versions? I don't have an opinion about the python ports right now. But in general, no, just because a port is unmaintained, or is

Re: Objection to restoring deprecated Python subports

2016-10-18 Thread Andrea D'Amore
On 18 October 2016 at 08:43, David Evans wrote: > BTW, why aren't we removing the outdated python24 python25 python26 python31 > python32 python33 ports? > Leaving these around just encourages proposals to regress back to these > relics. IIRC there was a policy of "as long