Re: r143478 -- gsl: update version 2.0->2.1

2016-01-14 Thread Takeshi Enomoto
Dear David, Thank you for letting me know. OK, let’s wait a few days to see if we need gsl116 or not. Regards, Takeshi - Takeshi Enomoto take...@macports.org ___ macports-dev mailing list macports-dev@lists.macosforge.org

Re: r143478 -- gsl: update version 2.0->2.1

2016-01-13 Thread Takeshi Enomoto
Hi, It seems that the update to gsl-2.x broke fgsl (#50295), which is compatible with 1.16. We may need gsl116 until the updates are provided by the upstream. Regards, Takeshi - Takeshi Enomoto take...@macports.org ___ macports-dev mailing list

Re: r143478 -- gsl: update version 2.0->2.1

2016-01-13 Thread David Evans
On 1/13/16 5:48 AM, Takeshi Enomoto wrote: > Hi, > > It seems that the update to gsl-2.x broke fgsl (#50295), which is compatible > with 1.16. > We may need gsl116 until the updates are provided by the upstream. > > Regards, > > Takeshi > > - > Takeshi Enomoto > take...@macports.org > >

Re: r143478 -- gsl: update version 2.0->2.1

2015-12-15 Thread David Evans
On 12/15/15 6:52 AM, petr wrote: > > The update to gsl @2.1 seems to have broken binary compatibility with > dependent ports. So they need to be revision bumped. I see this for `nco` and > `qgis` but there are very probably more. See below. > > ~petr > > > {{{ > [...] > ---> Installing gsl