Re: Port Reclaim

2023-11-06 Thread Saagar Jha
I have noticed that “port install” will not mark a port as requested if it is already installed (e.g. as a dependency of something else you installed). Perhaps this is something that might be worth changing? Saagar Jha > On Nov 6, 2023, at 04:03, Mark Anderson wrote: > > Is that the only

Re: More classes of maintainer

2023-11-06 Thread Mark Anderson
The other thing that is different now is GitHub issues and projects have come a long way in terms of features - we can probably implement everything we do on Trac on Github as well. As I recall Github issues didn't have all the features we needed. It also would help us not need to manage our own

Re: Handing over maintainership

2023-11-06 Thread Mark Anderson
I'd be interested in qucs and asco as I'm an EE with EDA experience - what state are they in? —Mark ___ Mark E. Anderson MacPorts Trac WikiPage GitHub Profile On Mon, Nov 6, 2023 at 7:08 AM Mark Anderson

Port Reclaim

2023-11-06 Thread Mark Anderson
I'm noticing that port reclaim routinely is asking to uninstall all my ports. And this is not post migration. The rest of the command works as I expect. —Mark ___ Mark E. Anderson MacPorts Trac WikiPage GitHub Profile

Re: Port Reclaim

2023-11-06 Thread Kirill A. Korinsky via macports-dev
you may specificly mark your port to be requested via `port setrequested blabla` -- wbr, Kirill > On 6. Nov 2023, at 11:39, Mark Anderson wrote: > > I'm noticing that port reclaim routinely is asking to uninstall all my ports. > And this is not post migration. The rest of the command works as

Re: Port Reclaim

2023-11-06 Thread Mark Anderson
Is that the only way? I've done that in the past with migrations, but for Sonoma, I did a fresh install and installed ports as I wanted them again from a list I kept. I assumed if I did a `port install` on any port it would have marked those as requested. —Mark ___ Mark E.

Re: More classes of maintainer

2023-11-06 Thread Perry E. Metzger
On 11/6/23 06:49, Mark Anderson wrote: The other thing that is different now is GitHub issues and projects have come a long way in terms of features - we can probably implement everything we do on Trac on Github as well. As I recall Github issues didn't have all the features we needed. It

Re: Port Reclaim

2023-11-06 Thread Kirill A. Korinsky via macports-dev
are you sure that you have migrated list of requested ports as well? As far as I recall the list of requested ports are migrated at separetly steps. Otherwise it should be expected and default behaviour to mark something as requested when you install it via `port install blabla` -- wbr, Kirill

Re: More classes of maintainer

2023-11-06 Thread Rainer Müller
On November 6, 2023 12:49:26 PM GMT+01:00, Mark Anderson wrote: >The other thing that is different now is GitHub issues and projects have >come a long way in terms of features - we can probably implement everything >we do on Trac on Github as well. Well, that is what I was asking... I am not

Re: More classes of maintainer

2023-11-06 Thread Rainer Müller
[Resending, K-9 Mail from mobile sent it with an empty HTML version.] On 06/11/2023 12.49, Mark Anderson wrote: > The other thing that is different now is GitHub issues and projects have > come a long way in terms of features - we can probably implement > everything we do on Trac on Github as

Re: Port Reclaim

2023-11-06 Thread Mark Anderson
This is a 100% fresh install. I have had this problem with migrations before - so I decided to start fresh this time. —Mark ___ Mark E. Anderson MacPorts Trac WikiPage GitHub Profile On Mon, Nov 6, 2023 at

Re: Port Reclaim

2023-11-06 Thread Christopher Jones
Run > port list requested and check everything you expect to be there is. If not, manually set it as requested yourself > sudo port setrequested XYZ port reclaim will not remove anything in the above list, or anything in the dependency tree of something in that list. Anything else is fair