On Sat, 20 Apr 2024 00:25:47 +0200,
Sergio Had wrote:
>
> What do we do? :)
To fix the build you have two options:
1. Revert that patch for system before 10.7
2. Remove folder contrib/credential/osxkeychain
I suggest to follow (2) as simpler thay and the good news that osxkeychain
is something
On Fri, 19 Apr 2024, René J.V. Bertin wrote:
On Friday April 19 2024 22:10:40 Kirill A. Korinsky wrote:
Because MacPorts download distfiles and packages from HTTP, not HTTPS
because it contains checksums for that it downloads :)
Nope. Maybe for distfiles that are hosted on the own
Given it is in contrib, presumably it got its own upstream?
On Apr 21, 2024 at 11:24 +0800, Fred Wright , wrote:
>
> On Sat, 20 Apr 2024, Saagar Jha wrote:
>
> > Wait, I use osxkeychain. It’s basically a requirement if you’re pushing
> > to an authenticated server over HTTPS and don’t want to have
Wait, I use osxkeychain. It’s basically a requirement if you’re pushing to an
authenticated server over HTTPS and don’t want to have to deal with storing
keys yourself. I suspect it is used a lot for this.
> On Apr 19, 2024, at 23:52, Kirill A. Korinsky wrote:
>
> On Sat, 20 Apr 2024
On Sat, 20 Apr 2024, Saagar Jha wrote:
Wait, I use osxkeychain. It’s basically a requirement if you’re pushing
to an authenticated server over HTTPS and don’t want to have to deal
with storing keys yourself. I suspect it is used a lot for this.
I have yet to see a Git repo that didn't allow
Yes, I also use it for this.
We want it to work.
On Apr 21, 2024 at 00:19 +0800, Saagar Jha , wrote:
> Wait, I use osxkeychain. It’s basically a requirement if you’re pushing to an
> authenticated server over HTTPS and don’t want to have to deal with storing
> keys yourself. I suspect it is
On Sat, 20 Apr 2024 18:19:30 +0200,
Saagar Jha wrote:
>
> Wait, I use osxkeychain. It’s basically a requirement if you’re pushing to
> an authenticated server over HTTPS and don’t want to have to deal with
> storing keys yourself. I suspect it is used a lot for this.
>
Do you use on 10.6?
I
Is someone in touch with Git upstream? It should be pretty trivial to retain
the working code, they are perhaps simply assuming that nobody uses it. Which
is not the case, obviously.
On Apr 21, 2024 at 02:41 +0800, Kirill A. Korinsky , wrote:
> On Sat, 20 Apr 2024 18:19:30 +0200,
> Saagar Jha
On Sat, 20 Apr 2024 20:45:36 +0200,
Sergio Had wrote:
>
> Is someone in touch with Git upstream? It should be pretty trivial to
> retain the working code, they are perhaps simply assuming that nobody uses
> it. Which is not the case, obviously.
I really doubt that anyone care about of macOS 10.6
