Re: [GSoC] Call for Mentors GSoC 2017

Hi Jackson, On Tue, Feb 07, 2017 at 09:22:03AM +0530, Jackson Isaac wrote: > I have already started the application process by coordinating with > Rainer. If we have sufficient mentors and a admin and backup admin(s), > we can move ahead with the application process. Thanks for making the

Re: 2.4.0 upgrade issue

Hi, On Sat, Jan 28, 2017 at 11:01:06AM +1100, Joshua Root wrote: > I guess we could modify this as part of the upgrade process? Or > transparently map the old setting to the new like we do with > portdbformat? Yeah, I guess we should. The old URLs should really go away and we should eventually

Re: Removal of llvm-3.5 and llvm-3.6

On Fri, Jan 27, 2017 at 04:14:27PM -0800, Jeremy Huddleston Sequoia wrote: > With the release of 2.4.0, base no longer uses clang 3.5 and 3.6 in > their fallbacks, and these two compilers don't really serve a purpose > any more. 3.5 has i386 codegen issues, and 3.7 works everywhere that > 3.6

Re: Resolving pull request conflicts

ou added a merge commit, which might possibly have been preserved by the rebase merge method and would have ended up in the master history. HTH, -- Clemens Lang

Re: build progress bar

On Mon, Feb 20, 2017 at 10:17:05PM +0100, René J.V. Bertin wrote: > I don't think I was the one who wrote that :) Hence the double quotation markers as opposed to single ones where I was quoting you. > Speaking of "quite a few people" who provide line number info: how do > you consider handling

Re: [macports-base] branch master updated: Fix version check for Git autostashing

Hi, On Mon, Nov 07, 2016 at 09:25:40PM +0100, Lawrence Velázquez wrote: > src/macports1.0/macports.tcl | 3 ++- > 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) > > diff --git a/src/macports1.0/macports.tcl b/src/macports1.0/macports.tcl > index 14d628f..6aafa73 100644 > ---

Re: Fwd: Build Failure: (from, 10.6, OS, This, X, builds, configure.compiler=macports-gcc-4.7, newer, on, only, and 6 more

On Sun, Dec 11, 2016 at 02:28:14PM +0100, René J.V. Bertin wrote: > > A Portfile should not should not print anything in response to it > > simply being opened. (Think about it, does a user really want to see > > this message whenever they run 'port info' > > Yes they are supposed to! Cf. #52981

Re: Some Homebrew commands send data to Google Analytics vs. port mpstats

On Fri, Dec 16, 2016 at 04:00:37AM +1100, Joshua Root wrote: > The installer isn't really conducive to this. We could definitely > advertise it better though, both in the documentation and with a > message inviting users to install the port if they haven't. I'm > thinking the latter should use the

Re: Fwd: Build Failure: (from, 10.6, OS, This, X, builds, configure.compiler=macports-gcc-4.7, newer, on, only, and 6 more

On Sun, Dec 11, 2016 at 03:38:14PM +0100, René J.V. Bertin wrote: > > Because it runs 'port -q info --line --subports' and parses the > > result. The flags to info guarantee that only the list of subports > > is printed. > > Portindex? I'm pretty sure I've had a ui_msg for a while in one of my >

Re: Fwd: Build Failure: (from, 10.6, OS, This, X, builds, configure.compiler=macports-gcc-4.7, newer, on, only, and 6 more

On Sun, Dec 11, 2016 at 08:14:13PM +0100, René J.V. Bertin wrote: > > > Just as machine readable as this line. > > > > Wrong, since 'port -q info --line --$fieldname' by definition only > > contains information on $fieldname, whereas your message contains > > natural language. > > Clutching at

Re: `git describe`

he past, we often just checked for new features by testing whether > the corresponding option or proc exists. That didn't work in this particular case: https://github.com/macports/macports-ports/blob/master/archivers/deco-archive/Portfile#L23 -- Clemens Lang

Re: dblatex @0.3.7 update to 0.3.9

Hi, On Tue, Jan 03, 2017 at 09:48:34AM +0100, Joël Brogniart via macports-dev wrote: > An happy new year for all. > > Could someone take a loot at ticket #53081? Done, will push in a couple of minutes. -- Clemens

Re: rsync server out of date?

Hi, On Fri, Dec 30, 2016 at 11:13:21PM -0700, Marcus Calhoun-Lopez wrote: > I just ran `port sync`, but the ports are several days behind the > GitHub repository. I have never encountered this before and am at a > bit of a loss as to how to proceed. Is anyone else having this > problem? Can

Re: tuning the behaviour of the -u option?

Hi, On Fri, Dec 23, 2016 at 11:11:57AM +0100, René J.V. Bertin wrote: > It's probably overkill to support a universal filter that could > theoretically catch all possible selections of inactive versions to > prune and not to prune. There is however one useful case that might > not be so hard:

Re: manpages is mdoc(7)

Hey, On Thu, Mar 30, 2017 at 07:08:44PM +0200, Jan Stary wrote: > Currently, the port-* manpages are written using the legacy man(7) > language which uses low-level roff constructs to described > presentational details. > > I propose to rewrite them into the _semantic_ markup of mdoc(7) >

Re: GSoC'17: Add migrate action to port command Project

Hey everybody, On Tue, Mar 28, 2017 at 01:37:55PM -0700, Bradley Giesbrecht wrote: > > On Mar 28, 2017, at 11:55 AM, Umesh Singla wrote: > > Does the migrate and snapshot actions help you divide the work? The > snapshot action is basically an inventory of what is

Re: build progress bar

On Thu, Mar 09, 2017 at 09:45:44AM +0100, René J.V. Bertin wrote: > I don't disagree, but how would we determine from there that a build > is going to be done (or destroot, I'd add that step too)? Or would we > simply support progress logging for everything invoked through > Pextlib's system call

Re: [macports-ports] branch master updated: mosh: 1.3.0, switch to CommonCrypto

Hi, On Sat, Apr 01, 2017 at 12:48:08PM -0500, Ryan Schmidt wrote: > Mountain Lion works with CommonCrypto, but Lion and earlier now fails > with: > > configure: error: Apple Common Crypto header not found > > The previous version of the port was still building successfully on > Leopard and

Re: [macports-ports] branch master updated: nginx: Add headers_more module support

point where I sometimes have to disable them for nginx updates because they are incompatible), so we may be stuck with the variants for a while. -- Clemens Lang

Re: python port - use pypi or github

most of the boilerplate and is better tested, since most python ports use PyPI. HTH, -- Clemens Lang

Re: GSoC Proposal

Hi, On Thu, Apr 13, 2017 at 12:37:55AM +0200, Mojca Miklavec wrote: > I was talking to someone from the HB community. Apparently they tried > very hard to make Travis CI work. One of the major problems they had > other than the time limit (the builder is relatively slow and jobs get > killed

Re: build progress bar

Hi, On Wed, Feb 22, 2017 at 03:47:32PM +0100, René J.V. Bertin wrote: > > Yes. Probably still not a good idea to put progress guessing into > > the implementation of ui_info, though. > > proc ui_message is where I've put it because that's the function that > gets called from Pextlib. That

Re: Build base archives for CI in a separate repository

Hi, - On 28 Jul, 2017, at 04:06, Zero King l...@macports.org wrote: > On Thu, Jul 27, 2017 at 07:56:27PM +0200, Clemens Lang wrote: > > What's your use case for re-tagging on the same commit? I.e. what change > > do you expect from rebuilding without changing something in the

Re: Petulant buildbots

Hi, On Sun, Jul 16, 2017 at 10:30:13AM -0400, Craig Treleaven wrote: > I’ve updated mkvtoolnix to 13.0.0. On my main system (OS X 10.10, > Xcode 7.2.1) it builds and runs without issue. Building in trace mode > did not work Why did the build in trace mode not work? > checking whether xsltproc

Announcing paste.macports.org

Hello MacPorts developers! For l2dy's Google Summer of Code project of providing us with a continuous integration system, we noticed a limitation of 4 MiB of logs per build running on Travis CI (which we could easily happen with dependencies and multiple subports) and decided to work around this

Re: [GSoC 2017] Second Evaluation

Hi Jackson, On Mon, Jul 24, 2017 at 09:40:24PM +0530, Jackson Isaac wrote: > Phase 2 evaluations has begun. Deadline for filling the evaluations is > July 28, 2017 16:00 UTC. The procedure remains the same as previous. > Also please summarize the work done until now, challenges faced and > how

Re: Build base archives for CI in a separate repository

hand, you could try to inject a > system "/bin/ls -laeO@ ${target_dir}" > right before the 'file delete' to find out if there is anything like an > immutable flag on this file or directory. This might also happen if our builds are run under a sandbox, which could denies deleting files in this location. -- Clemens Lang

Re: rsync server out of date?

Hi, On Sat, Jul 22, 2017 at 07:48:59AM -0700, Marcus Calhoun-Lopez wrote: > I just ran `port sync`, but the ports are several days behind the > GitHub repository. Is anyone else having this problem? We're aware of the problem and are in contact with GitHub support to resolve the issue. If you

Re: man.macports.org

Hi, On Wed, Jun 28, 2017 at 10:27:31AM +0200, Rainer Müller wrote: > On 2017-06-28 00:28, Clemens Lang wrote: > > How are those updated? Are we using the master manpages? > > I created a buildbot deploy job for that [1]. However, as we still > lack a builder to run job

Re: Buildbot now fails to build wine dependencies

Hi, On Tue, Jul 04, 2017 at 04:23:13PM +0200, Rainer Müller wrote: > I still don't understand why we pass *default* variants to > dependencies at all. As I see it, the problem would go away if we > would not request default variants explicitly... > > @Clemens, > as you originally added this to

Re: Buildbot now fails to build wine dependencies

re you going to commit this change? -- Clemens Lang

Re: man.macports.org

Hi, On Tue, Jun 27, 2017 at 01:37:12AM +0200, Rainer Müller wrote: > Hello, > > I created a preliminary version of a linkable web version of our man pages: > > https://man.macports.org/port.1.html Love it! > If anyone would be willing to contribute a better CSS, that would be > highly

Re: Congratulations to all the selected GSOC students and projects

Hey, On Tue, May 09, 2017 at 12:47:15PM +1000, Joshua Root wrote: > On 2017-5-9 12:11 , Zero King wrote: > > Does anyone have a list of packages to install on Ubuntu Trusty to > > run MacPorts? This would save some test builds for Travis. > > The "Other Platforms" section of

Re: GitHub getopt repository

Hi Ryan, On Mon, Jun 19, 2017 at 08:35:46PM -0500, Ryan Schmidt wrote: > On Jun 19, 2017, at 20:34, Zero King wrote: > > > On Mon, Jun 19, 2017 at 08:31:16PM -0500, Ryan Schmidt wrote: > >> > >> I understand why I got the email. I don't understand why we have a > >> repository for getopt when

Re: [GSoC 2017] Community Bonding

Hi, On Tue, May 23, 2017 at 12:52:55AM +0530, Umesh Singla wrote: > I have written two introductory posts on my blog [0] on Blogger. I > thought I shared the link to it in the proposal but no, I didn't. The > one is just when the results got announced and other about my take on > the

Re: finding dependents of a shared library

Hi, On Wed, May 24, 2017 at 04:23:15PM +0200, René J.V. Bertin wrote: > AFAIK the way rev-upgrade works is > - rev-upgrade scans a list of all supposed-to-be-present binary files Correct. > - for each file on that list it determines the list of dependencies > (or list of deps provided by

Re: [GSoC 2017] Community Bonding

Hi, On Fri, May 26, 2017 at 12:57:11AM +0530, Umesh Singla wrote: > Since we are planning on 3 different actions which can also be used > independently like snapshot and migrate, having 2 scripts in the > macports1.0 directory directly or keeping these 2 commands in a single > script doesn't seem

Re: Congratulations to all the selected GSOC students and projects

Hi Umesh and Zero, and welcome to MacPorts! You have been accepted into Google Summer of Code 2017 and will work for MacPorts over the summer. Congratulations, we are happy to have you! First of all let me welcome you to our organization. I am looking forward to a good summer with an interesting

Re: Port hanging (unresponsive to Ctrl+C, need SIGKILL)

Hi, On Wed, May 24, 2017 at 09:50:31PM +0200, Leonardo Brondani Schenkel wrote: > I have been working on an update to the Free42 port, which I just > opened a PR for: > https://github.com/macports/macports-ports/pull/486 > > However I am experiencing something I never encountered before, which >

Re: ignore "portfile changed" ?

the statefile and remove the destroot line from it, otherwise macports will assume destroot was already successfully completed. Hi, -- Clemens Lang

Re: Appropriateness for inclusion in MacPorts

Hi, On Tue, Sep 12, 2017 at 12:28:07PM +, Rainer Müller wrote: > As Java applications are mostly self-contained without external > dependencies (no dynamically linked libraries), I guess the approach > to just extract the .zip will work. > > However, I do not know what kind of compatibility

Re: Why does macports require a migration across major version bumps?

Hi, On Tue, Aug 29, 2017 at 06:01:36PM -0700, Eitan Adler wrote: > What is the underlying reason to require a reinstall across major > versions? I did something silly/stupid/smart and removed the check > from libexec/macports/lib/macports1.0/macports.tcl and just did 'sudo > port upgrade

Re: [GSoC] Progress Report

Hi, On Fri, Aug 18, 2017 at 04:16:25AM +, Zero King wrote: > In the next week, I'll automate deployment of base binaries used by > the CI bot and work on graceful shutdown of the PR bot. I'll also > write a blog post in Markdown that describes the work I've done and > upload it to

Re: Bugfixes to backport to MacPorts 2.4.x

also cherry-pick: sandbox: Allow file-write-data for /var/db/mds https://github.com/macports/macports-base/commit/1f7658abba0d8383071b059daff726a8c9f6 Close the portfiles after reading https://github.com/macports/macports-base/commit/c2df3cc958635f7ac6d0983288723c6ea097b221 -- Clemens Lang

Re: [macports-guide] branch master updated: Convert from docbook 4.5 -> 5.0

Hi, On Sat, Dec 16, 2017 at 05:30:26PM -0800, Eitan Adler wrote: > P.S. Any thoughts on adding travisCI testing to www/ to avoid 'make > validate' errors? I don't mind setting this up, though it would > require an admin to click a button in the web UI. Sure, that would be nice, especially since

Re: trace mode fails with sh: /usr/bin/tar: No such file or directory

Hi, On Mon, Dec 18, 2017 at 08:05:17AM +1100, Joshua Root wrote: > On 2017-12-18 07:54 , Ken Cunningham wrote: > >> On Dec 17, 2017, at 12:52 PM, Joshua Root wrote: > >> On 2017-12-18 07:18 , Ken Cunningham wrote: > >>> I haven’t been able to use trace mode to test port

Re: New project member: lbschenkel

I'm late to the party, but anyway: On Sun, Oct 22, 2017 at 04:23:33PM +, Rainer Müller wrote: > Please join us in welcoming the following new MacPorts project member: > > - Leonardo Brondani Schenkel (lbschenkel) Welcome aboard! Glad to have you! -- Clemens

Re: Gsoc 18 Project | Collect build statistics

Hi, On Mon, May 07, 2018 at 10:31:09AM +0200, Mojca Miklavec wrote: > On 6 May 2018 at 20:52, Bradley Giesbrecht wrote: > > macports-webapp? > > Let's go with that one then. Created. -- Clemens

Re: macports_version

should be documented. [1] https://github.com/macports/macports-base/blob/master/src/macports1.0/macports.tcl#L87-L98 -- Clemens Lang

Re: is "port reclaim" not documented?

ybe it's not in your release yet? Hi, -- Clemens Lang

Re: macports_version

thing unsupported. IMHO, using a proc for read-only variables is much cleaner than using a write trace, which feels like a hack to me. Why would you need it to be a variable? Could you not just call the proc instead? -- Clemens Lang

Re: Online Meeting 2018-05-26

Hi, On Fri, May 25, 2018 at 04:50:48PM +0200, Rainer Müller wrote: > in our last meeting, we scheduled the next meeting to be tomorrow, > 2018-05-26 13:00 UTC. However, this seems to have fallen off the > radar, because we have not set any agenda yet... > > One point would be the website-related

Re: Trac not sending messages?

Hi, On Sun, Jun 24, 2018 at 08:23:36PM +0200, Mihai Moldovan wrote: > Have you also noticed Trac not sending out email notifications for the > past 36 hours or the like? Well, the messages on the mailing list still arrive, and I also haven't noticed any missing notifications. Do you have more

Re: Trac ticket graph?

Hi, On Sun, Apr 29, 2018 at 04:44:44PM -0400, Perry E. Metzger wrote: > On Sun, 29 Apr 2018 16:29:34 -0400 "Perry E. Metzger" > wrote: > > I don't know much about Trac. Is it possible to do a query against > > it to get raw data on open tickets over time, which could be

Re: Why didn't this PR get labeled?

Hi Zero, On Mon, Apr 30, 2018 at 09:49:10AM -0400, Perry E. Metzger wrote: > Sometimes, I've noticed, PRs in the queue don't get automatically > labeled as expected. See this one, for example: > > https://github.com/macports/macports-ports/pull/1687 > > Anyone know why? Can you take a look?

Re: Strange behaviour of trace mode in MacPorts 2.4.3 / 10.13

is also signed (which our copy is not). This usually means that the binary will not run under trace mode, i.e. your svn fetch was run without trace mode. In consequence, this means that your fetch failure could not have been related to trace mode. -- Clemens Lang

Re: Python 2.7 – allow another db version beside 4.8

Hi, On Sat, Dec 23, 2017 at 12:39:34PM +0100, Vincent Habchi wrote: > I’ve a made a private change to my python27 Portfile to allow it to > use DB60 instead of the default DB48, which was installed only for its > needs. I think allowing people (through a variant) to build a Python > 2.7 version

Re: why does standard configure uses -Os?

Hi, On Mon, Dec 25, 2017 at 08:32:00AM +, Chris Jones wrote: > > Ports are free to override configure.optflags if desired. > > That’s not the same as simply letting the underlying package decide, > via its configure script or similar. That’s the point at which > upstream gets to say what

Re: poppler, security updates in general...

be that could be used here? -- Clemens Lang

Re: GSOC 2018 org application period has begun

Hi, On Wed, Jan 10, 2018 at 08:36:39AM +0530, Jackson Isaac wrote: > That's great :) I'll help you out. Probably its time for me to become > a Mentor now ;) > > > Let me know what you think and also, if any other criteria MacPorts > > has. I'd be happy to volunteer. Could use someone as backup

Re: poppler, security updates in general...

Hi, On Wed, Jan 10, 2018 at 04:39:05PM +0100, Rainer Müller wrote: > > I think you’re referring to Repology: > > > > https://repology.org > > > > No CVE linkages that I can see there. That would be a valuable > > resource though. That's the one, thanks. > I do not think Repology would offer

Re: Allowing PortGroups to bump port revision

Hi, On Sun, Jan 14, 2018 at 12:01:34AM +1100, Joshua Root wrote: > portindex isn't slow, mportopen is. You have to evaluate the changed > Portfiles before you can extract their info. I haven't measures this, but I assume the majority of time in mportopen is spent by the sub-interpreter loading

Re: Allowing PortGroups to bump port revision

Hi, On Fri, Jan 12, 2018 at 03:30:50PM -0800, Jeremy Huddleston Sequoia wrote: > In https://trac.macports.org/ticket/54744, we've been pondering adding > a PortGroup to allow concurrent installation of multiple providers of > the OpenSSL API (eg: openssl, libressl, libressl-devel) and allow >

Re: system -notty what is it for?

Hi, On Thu, Feb 08, 2018 at 11:18:33AM -0800, Ken Cunningham wrote: > I noted here > > https://github.com/macports/macports-base/blob/master/src/pextlib1.0/system.c > > > an option for system called “-notty” > >

Re: Any spare mac hardware (for MacPorts meeting) lying around?

Hi, On Mon, Feb 19, 2018 at 11:32:50PM +0100, Mojca Miklavec wrote: > From 10th to 14th March we'll be meeting at the 2nd MacPorts Meeting > in Slovenia. > > https://trac.macports.org/wiki/Meetings/MacPortsMeeting2018 > > During the last meeting we borrowed two older Mac Pros (box format, >

Re: Java port maintainers: What should be installed on the buildbot workers?

On Fri, Feb 23, 2018 at 06:43:27PM -0600, Ryan Schmidt wrote: > I think I should probably install Oracle's latest Java 8 on the Lion > and later buildbot workers. Does that seem reasonable? I don't know if > our java portgroup is compatible with that. The java portgroup uses

Re: Suggestions for hacking sessions & discussions for the MacPorts meeting in March

Hi, On Wed, Feb 21, 2018 at 05:33:53PM +0100, Mojca Miklavec wrote: > I have a few ideas, but I would like to gather more input about what > you consider the most burning issues that might need some discussions > or hacking sessions during the MacPorts meeting. We'll try to fit > those on the

Re: Suggestions for hacking sessions & discussions for the MacPorts meeting in March

Hi, On Wed, Feb 21, 2018 at 05:33:53PM +0100, Mojca Miklavec wrote: > I have a few ideas, but I would like to gather more input about what > you consider the most burning issues that might need some discussions > or hacking sessions during the MacPorts meeting. We'll try to fit > those on the

Re: GSoC 2018: Interested in Improving startup item code

This could probably be done together with rule adaptions for trace mode to hide Xcode if a dependency was not declared, so port maintainers had a simple way to test whether their port uses Xcode. -- Clemens Lang

Re: squash and merge, license documentation, "size" documentation

Hi Perry, On Fri, Aug 17, 2018 at 09:44:47AM -0400, Perry E. Metzger wrote: > As many of you are aware, I merge a significant fraction of the pull > requests these days. Thanks! > 1. We have squash and merge disabled. This means that I often have to > coach people through doing the squash on

Re: Upgrading Pandoc

Hi, On Sun, Mar 04, 2018 at 02:18:24PM -0500, Mark Anderson wrote: > So I started trying to move pandoc from some older version to 2.1.1 > but then I realized I needed to upgrade the Haskell compiler and > libraries to do that. I got started, but wow, this is something else. > Does anyone have

Re: Changing default cxx_stdlib to libc++

Hi, On Mon, Mar 12, 2018 at 04:45:39PM -0500, Ryan Schmidt wrote: > You'll see each PR title has a red "X" or a green "√" next to it. > That's the indicator of whether Travis built the PR successfully or > not. You can click them for more information. > > A failed Travis CI build does not

Action Required: Clone Your MacPorts User Repository on GitHub

Hello, If you find yourself in the To list of this email, you still have a user repository in the MacPorts GitHub organization at https://github.com/macports/macports-user- We have created this repository from the users/ subfolder of the MacPorts Subversion repository when we moved to GitHub.

Re: [macports-ports] branch master updated: libcaer: new port

Hi, On Sat, Mar 03, 2018 at 06:50:35AM +, Zero King wrote: > Let's discuss this during the meeting, I also have to check why it > failed to upload logs to the pastebin. From > https://travis-ci.org/macports/macports-ports/jobs/348478666#L316, it > seems to be a permission problem. Do we keep

Re: problem with font DejaVuSansMono

IO. Try running $> sudo opensnoop -n fc-cache in a separate terminal to see whether it is in fact hanging or just taking a long time. -- Clemens Lang

Re: [macports-ports] branch master updated: jack: Fix upgrade path from jack1

Hi, On Sat, Apr 07, 2018 at 07:16:37AM -0500, Ryan Schmidt wrote: > I still think jack should not handle this differently from other > ports. If we want automatic upgrades for ports that have build > conflicts with themselves, then we want that for all such ports, not > just for jack. Sure, but

Re: [macports-ports] 01/04: aften: An A/52 audio encoder

- On 6 Apr, 2018, at 08:03, Ryan Schmidt ryandes...@macports.org wrote: > jack conflicts with jack? Thanks, remnant from my attempts to package jack and jack2 in separate ports. Fixed in 678e0100a4c07d55750e6dc667492dc26cdab208. > On Apr 5, 2018, at 18:18, Clemens Lang

Re: Buiid/install stages documentation?

and possibly steal > pieces of? You can take a look at the haskell portgroup, which uses cabal to build and destroot things. The rust portgroup that uses cargo might also be an interesting example. -- Clemens Lang

Re: Can't use Expect in a portfile

is looks safe to commit to me. Hi, -- Clemens Lang

Re: Regarding acl2 Port

there any easy way to do so (maybe run a build > bot job ?). There's no easy way to test variant combinations. With acl2's 5 variants, testing each combination would already mean starting 32 builds. This is computationally not feasible. I usually test each variant separately, and sometimes all variants together. -- Clemens Lang

Re: CI system for PR builds

Hi, On Mon, Apr 02, 2018 at 08:43:52PM +0200, db wrote: > GitLab 10.6 released with CI/CD for GitHub > > https://about.gitlab.com/2018/03/22/gitlab-10-6-released/#open-source-projects Interesting, but I couldn't find any indication that this would support builds on macOS. Do you have more info?

Re: Resetting pre-/post- hooks?

Hi, On Mon, Mar 26, 2018 at 04:25:20PM +0200, René J.V. Bertin wrote: > Is it possible to reset/remove pre- and post- hooks, e.g. a > post-destroot? No.

Re: make SHELL='sh -x'

Hi, On Mon, Mar 26, 2018 at 02:29:52PM +0200, macpo...@parvis.nl wrote: > I use the trick "make SHELL='sh -x' " to see where the make > process errors, but I cannot find a way to set it (temporary). > > build.env SHELL='sh -x' doesn't work. build.args-append SHELL="sh -x" should work.

Re: [macports-base] 12/18: fetch: Always use port:git for fetch.type git

1.8.3.4 (Apple Git-47). Unfortunately that version of git has a bug in its 'git archive' that was later fixed. However, this bug causes the output to change, which breaks the entire approach of having checksums for the archives generated by this branch. Remember that checksums for files downloaded from GitHub would suddenly change? If we don't want to end up in the same situation, we'll need this dependency. -- Clemens Lang

Re: How do I check what is autobuilding successfully?

Hi, On Wed, Apr 25, 2018 at 02:58:13PM -0400, Perry E. Metzger wrote: > There's a port I suspect hasn't built in a long while. How can I check > on what is and isn't building on the buildbots? Recently, we added build status reporting to commits in macports-ports. If a port has been updated

Re: Online meeting next Saturday?

Hi, On Sun, Oct 14, 2018 at 07:29:04PM +0200, Mojca Miklavec wrote: > What do you think about another MacPorts online meeting next Saturday > (20th) at 13:00 UTC? > > If you are interested in joining: > - Do you have time? > - Or do you propose another weekend which would be more suitable? > -

Re: Online meeting next Saturday?

Hi, On Fri, Oct 26, 2018 at 10:11:55PM +0200, Mojca Miklavec wrote: > So: any interest for a meeting tomorrow, or a better suggestion for > the date? I have an appointment tomorrow so I won't be able to join. Don't let that stop you from doing the meeting anyway, though. Better to meet more

Re: Speed up trace mode (GSoC Project)

On Sun, Mar 31, 2019 at 10:06:12PM +0530, Mihir Luthra wrote: > I need help understanding *static* *int* TracelibRunCmd(Tcl_Interp > *in), it has blown my mind, I am totally new with these kevents. > > I have been trying to understand that from a while now. Till what I > understand, the thread

Re: Speed up trace mode (GSoC Project)

Hi Mihir, On Thu, Apr 04, 2019 at 06:25:00PM +0530, Mihir Luthra wrote: > I have made the memory expansion idea precise and filtered out bugs > from the one I sent previously. > Please check the pdf in the attachment. I see you're getting the hang of the difficulties of the project now :) You

Re: Speed up trace mode (GSoC Project)

Hi Mihir, On Thu, Mar 28, 2019 at 12:07:20AM +0530, Mihir Luthra wrote: > On Wed, Mar 27, 2019 at 10:22 PM Mojca Miklavec wrote: > > What I miss a bit is some clear definition of deliverables, what > > pieces of code would be suitable enough for merging them into base > > and when. > > > >

Re: macports-dev Digest, Vol 152, Issue 1

Hi Mihir, On Mon, Apr 01, 2019 at 09:13:42PM +0530, Mihir Luthra wrote: > Actually my question is what is the purpose of the call (1), because > till what I understood, kevent(2) only lets the program proceed > further when it will return and it only returns when it detects an > event. Call (1)

Re: Regarding GSoC

Hi, On Fri, Mar 22, 2019 at 05:06:08PM +0100, Mojca Miklavec wrote: > Our tickets are accessible from > https://trac.macports.org/wiki/Tickets > and the most relevant for you would live in "Base Bugs" and "Base > Enhancements". Or > https://trac.macports.org/roadmap > However I'm not sure

Re: Speed up trace mode Project GSoC

ode that deals with the cache data structure needs to be aware of that. > On Wed, Mar 20, 2019 at 3:04 AM Clemens Lang wrote: > > > Hi, > > > > On Sun, Mar 17, 2019 at 01:03:00PM +0530, Mihir Luthra wrote: > > > I wanted to contact you regarding the “Speed Up tr

Re: Speed up trace mode (GSoC Project)

Hi, On Sun, Mar 24, 2019 at 08:40:30PM +0530, Mihir Luthra wrote: > I had a few questions regarding Darwin trace library. > > Darwintrace library being injected, most I/O operations get > reimplemented. If a “single” process is working on files, it more or > less should call most of these

Server outage

Hi everybody, as you may have noticed, the services hosted by braeburn (trac, website, mailing lists, the GitHub bot, the pastebin service) have been offline since 22:41 UTC yesterday. This happened because the machine did not come back up after a routine reboot due to a kernel upgrade. Rainer

Re: Auto-Detection of Build Dependencies, Gsoc 2019

Hi, On Sun, Mar 10, 2019 at 09:46:32AM -0700, Marcus Calhoun-Lopez wrote: > I am responding to this message on the developer mailing list in case > anyone else has more insight than I. > > A minor point: you may want to avoid the word “trace” in this context > since trace has another meaning in

Re: Speed up trace mode (GSoC Project)

Hi, On Sat, Apr 06, 2019 at 01:05:08AM +0530, Mihir Luthra wrote: > > You have the right ideas to solve the problem. Do keep in mind > > though that CAS will only work up to a word size or a double word > > size at most, i.e. swapping more than 64 bit with CAS atomically is > > probably not going

Re: Speed up trace mode (GSoC Project)

Hi, On Sun, Apr 07, 2019 at 01:03:12AM +0530, Mihir Luthra wrote: > > Can you pastebin a main.log of a build that fails like this? > > https://pastebin.com/FVdp4WTw The problematic lines are :debug:archivefetch failed verification with key /opt/local/share/macports/macports-pubkey.pem

Re: GSoC 2019 proposal - Feedback request

Hi AmirAli, On Sat, Apr 06, 2019 at 06:17:25PM +, AmirAli Mashayekhi via macports-dev wrote: > I have uploaded my proposal draft on GSoC webpage. > > Unfortunately we at EPITA(mon École) got informed late about this > years GSoC opportunity. But this doesn’t affect my true excitement > about

Re: GSoC 2019 [Phase out dependency on Xcode]

Hi Satryaji, On Mon, Apr 08, 2019 at 10:44:43AM +0700, Satryaji Aulia wrote: > Hi Clemens, I'd also like your feedback on my proposal, particularly > about Xcode dependency. What do you think? I've left a couple of comments in your Google Doc, but overall yours is a solid proposal. Sorry for

  1   2   >