Re: cxx11 portgroup: C++11, C++14, C++17

2018-02-04 Thread Ryan Schmidt
On Feb 4, 2018, at 21:51, Ken Cunningham wrote: > > On Feb 4, 2018, at 9:36 PM, Ryan Schmidt wrote: > >> We should think about how this will work if and when it is integrated into >> MacPorts base and not a portgroup. I think starting with configure.cc_std >> and configure.cxx_std might work

Re: cxx11 portgroup: C++11, C++14, C++17

2018-02-04 Thread Ken Cunningham
> On Feb 4, 2018, at 9:36 PM, Ryan Schmidt wrote: > > We should think about how this will work if and when it is integrated into > MacPorts base and not a portgroup. I think starting with configure.cc_std and > configure.cxx_std might work well. > I’m trying to

Re: cxx11 portgroup: C++11, C++14, C++17

2018-02-04 Thread Ryan Schmidt
On Feb 4, 2018, at 20:21, Eitan Adler wrote: > On 4 February 2018 at 16:09, Ken Cunningham wrote: >> Please not more portgroups, tho. > > Why not? They would be rather similar to one another. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Don%27t_repeat_yourself We should think about how this will work if

Re: cxx11 portgroup: C++11, C++14, C++17

2018-02-04 Thread Eitan Adler
On 4 February 2018 at 16:09, Ken Cunningham wrote: > Please not more portgroups, tho. Why not? > How about we just move up that clang floor as time goes by? I'd actually be in favor of more explicit dependency usage. Either creating a new portgroup or a single

Re: cxx11 portgroup: C++11, C++14, C++17

2018-02-04 Thread Ken Cunningham
Somewhere in the tickets Marcus has this at least 1/2 done... K Sent from my iPhone > On Feb 4, 2018, at 7:14 PM, Ryan Schmidt wrote: > > >> On Feb 4, 2018, at 18:09, Ken Cunningham wrote: >> >>> On Feb 4, 2018, at 7:03 PM, Ryan Schmidt wrote: >>> On Feb 4,

Re: cxx11 portgroup: C++11, C++14, C++17

2018-02-04 Thread Ryan Schmidt
On Feb 4, 2018, at 18:09, Ken Cunningham wrote: > On Feb 4, 2018, at 7:03 PM, Ryan Schmidt wrote: > >> On Feb 4, 2018, at 18:01, Ken Cunningham wrote: >> >>> On Feb 4, 2018, at 6:56 PM, Ryan Schmidt wrote: The cxx11 portgroup is fine for C++11, but what do we want to do about

Re: cxx11 portgroup: C++11, C++14, C++17

2018-02-04 Thread Ken Cunningham
Please not more portgroups, tho. How about we just move up that clang floor as time goes by? K Sent from my iPhone > On Feb 4, 2018, at 7:03 PM, Ryan Schmidt wrote: > >> On Feb 4, 2018, at 18:01, Ken Cunningham wrote: >> >>> On Feb 4, 2018, at 6:56 PM, Ryan

Re: cxx11 portgroup: C++11, C++14, C++17

2018-02-04 Thread Ken Cunningham
By providing a current clang, like 5.0, all these are covered I believe. The PG is really misnamedshould be "modern compiler" PG or similar. K Sent from my iPhone > On Feb 4, 2018, at 6:56 PM, Ryan Schmidt wrote: > > The cxx11 portgroup is fine for C++11, but