On Sat, Mar 21, 2009 at 11:58:33PM -0500, Ryan Schmidt said:
[...]
There are valid reasons for wanting to rebuild a port that's already
installed. But it's probably reasonable to require the use of the -f flag
in those situations. And I believe that's what is supposed to be
implemented.
On Mar 22, 2009, at 02:34, Bryan Blackburn wrote:
On Sat, Mar 21, 2009 at 11:58:33PM -0500, Ryan Schmidt said:
[...]
There are valid reasons for wanting to rebuild a port that's already
installed. But it's probably reasonable to require the use of the -
f flag
in those situations. And I
Ryan Schmidt wrote:
* I was under the impression Mac Ports was sort of to replace
Fink, is that not the case? What are the pros and cons,
differences? Is Fink still active?
Fink and MacPorts are both package management systems for Mac OS X.
I myself switched from Fink to what is now
Ryan Schmidt wrote:
I think port not only pays attention to epoch/version/revision but
also the
timestamp of Portfile; when Portfile is newer than the install,
even when
the versioning says it's already installed, it'll run again.
I would not have expected that.
If a rebuild is
Darren Weber wrote:
What is up with port? It just ran for about 15 mins to build a package
that is already installed. If I were to work on the same damn thing,
repeating it all day, day after day, I would get the sack pretty
quickly. Just think of the useless load on the network and the
Ryan
I saw your post on the ticket. Does it mean that I am SOL or are you
looking at it still?
Thanks,
Pito
On Mar 21, 2009, at 6:43 PM, Ryan Schmidt wrote:
On Mar 21, 2009, at 14:38, R. Pito Salas wrote:
I am trying to get an application running which is in Python, and
in turn
On Mar 21, 2009, at 8:10 PM, Darren Weber wrote:
What is up with port? It just ran for about 15 mins to build a
package that is already installed. If I were to work on the same
damn thing, repeating it all day, day after day, I would get the
sack pretty quickly. Just think of the
Darren Weber wrote:
What is up with port? It just ran for about 15 mins to build a package that
is already installed. If I were to work on the same damn thing, repeating
it all day, day after day, I would get the sack pretty quickly. Just think
of the useless load on the network and the
Hello,
Wouldn't it be better and faster to do the check at request time
rather than wait until everything has been done and then request if
an update is wanted rather than an install?
Frank
On Mar 22, 2009, at 6:56 AM, Rainer Müller wrote:
Darren Weber wrote:
What is up with port? It
2009/3/22 Frank J. R. Hanstick tro...@comcast.net
Hello,
Wouldn't it be better and faster to do the check at request time rather
than wait until everything has been done and then request if an update is
wanted rather than an install?
Frank
Yes, sounds reasonable.
Also, my apologies!
Is it possible to use the sourceforge compile farm to provide binary distros
for macports?
Perhaps cdash or something like it could be used? FYI:
http://www.cdash.org/
Take care, Darren
PS, I assume GNU savanna is not available for anything that depends on OSX
(but does it also exclude BSD -
On Mar 22, 2009, at 9:34 AM, Rainer Müller wrote:
Ryan Schmidt wrote:
I think port not only pays attention to epoch/version/revision but
also the
timestamp of Portfile; when Portfile is newer than the install,
even when
the versioning says it's already installed, it'll run again.
I would not
On Mar 22, 2009, at 4:16 PM, Daniel J. Luke wrote:
On Mar 22, 2009, at 9:34 AM, Rainer Müller wrote:
Ryan Schmidt wrote:
I think port not only pays attention to epoch/version/revision but
also the
timestamp of Portfile; when Portfile is newer than the install,
even when
the versioning says
On Sun, Mar 22, 2009 at 11:19:35AM -0700, Darren Weber said:
[...]
On balance, I'm both impressed and disappointed with the complexity of the
macports system to date. For example, dependency resolution needs a lot of
work during upgrades,
What do you mean, performance-wise? If so, that's
Daniel J. Luke wrote:
If nobody can think of a valid use for this check we should just
drop it.
It is somewhat useful when one is developing a new port (since you
don't have to remember to clean before you rebuild after changing the
Portfile), and there's the -o flag one can use to
Darren Weber wrote:
Is it possible to use the sourceforge compile farm to provide binary
distros for macports?
The sourceforge compile farm does not exist any more for at least two
years now.
Rainer
___
macports-users mailing list
Can we talk more about this? I have the ability to host such a build
farm. Now, I could not host one machine, of every architecture, of
every OS, I just do not have the room in colocation.
I do have quite a bit of room if we go 1U though. So 2 1U machines, a
PPC and a Intel, and I would
Darren Weber wrote:
I've noticed problems during port upgrades.
What is the general consensus on having a TAG for each port to indicate
it's success status within the system?
Is it possible to have a meta-port monitor that automatically tracks the
status of each package install and
Daniel J. Luke wrote:
On Mar 22, 2009, at 9:34 AM, Rainer Müller wrote:
Ryan Schmidt wrote:
I think port not only pays attention to epoch/version/revision but
also the
timestamp of Portfile; when Portfile is newer than the install,
even when
the versioning says it's already installed, it'll
Scott Haneda wrote:
Can we talk more about this? I have the ability to host such a build
farm. Now, I could not host one machine, of every architecture, of
every OS, I just do not have the room in colocation.
I do have quite a bit of room if we go 1U though. So 2 1U machines, a
PPC and a
Hi all,
I just installed MacPorts 1.7.0 and my machine cannot access the rsync
URL
rsync.macports.org when I use the port -d selfupdate command.
Strangely enough, the url that ping looks up (alpha.osforge.org)
works in a browser,
so this indicates Port 80 is open. Is it possible that
Paul Sijpkes wrote:
Hi all,
I just installed MacPorts 1.7.0 and my machine cannot access the rsync URL
rsync.macports.org when I use the port -d selfupdate command.
Strangely enough, the url that ping looks up (alpha.osforge.org) works
in a browser,
so this indicates Port 80 is open. Is
I am hoping the maintainer of the tcl and tk ports can explain the
odd behavior I am seeing.
On Mar 22, 2009, at 09:15, R. Pito Salas wrote:
Ryan
I saw your post on the ticket. Does it mean that I am SOL or are
you looking at it still?
Thanks,
Pito
On Mar 21, 2009, at 6:43 PM, Ryan
Just a minute...
it says connection refused, not that it was not found...
This is my selfupdate output... any ideas anyone?
sudo port -dv selfupdate
Password:
DEBUG: Synchronizing ports tree(s)
Synchronizing local ports tree from rsync://rsync.macports.org/release/
ports/
DEBUG:
Paul Sijpkes wrote:
Thanks for your help Joshua,
Tried telneting, but still no luck... must be an ISP issue.
Am I missing something?
telnet rsync.macports.org 873
Trying 17.254.17.246...
telnet: connect to address 17.254.17.246: Connection refused
telnet: Unable to connect to remote
Okay, there was ticket opened on this about 18 months ago, number
#12684.
Says that if you are running PeerGuardian then it blocks incoming
connections from that socket.
I've killed peerguardian, but it's still happening...
Is there any other process that could do this?
On 23/03/2009, at
Paul Sijpkes wrote:
Okay, there was ticket opened on this about 18 months ago, number #12684.
Says that if you are running PeerGuardian then it blocks incoming
connections from that socket.
I've killed peerguardian, but it's still happening...
Is there any other process that could do this?
How do I do that? Sorry I'm very new to Macs, moved from Linux.
What's the process called?
On 23/03/2009, at 12:54 PM, Joshua Root wrote:
Paul Sijpkes wrote:
Okay, there was ticket opened on this about 18 months ago, number
#12684.
Says that if you are running PeerGuardian then it blocks
I've solved the problem...
sudo kextunload -b xxx.qnation.PeerGuardian
unloads PG.
Maybe this problem should be included in the FAQs?
Thanks for the help Joshua!
On 23/03/2009, at 1:06 PM, Paul Sijpkes wrote:
Okay, I've killed all PG processes, but it's still happening. I'm
assuming
On Mar 22, 2009, at 21:36, Paul Sijpkes wrote:
I've solved the problem...
sudo kextunload -b xxx.qnation.PeerGuardian
unloads PG.
Maybe this problem should be included in the FAQs?
It is in the FAQ:
http://trac.macports.org/wiki/
Find out the port and telnet to it. If you can, its an issue with
ports or your config.
If you can not, it is an issue with your network or settings.
--
Scott
Iphone says hello.
On Mar 22, 2009, at 6:02 PM, Paul Sijpkes paul.sijp...@gmail.com
wrote:
Hi all,
I just installed MacPorts
Is it possible to create a distributed build system that uses Xgrid, to
allow all macport users the option of adding their machine to a distributed
macports build system? In effect, every time anybody on this grid has to
build a package from source, some kind of meta-package monitor can detect
32 matches
Mail list logo
