Script to automate offline retrieval of distfiles etc, for internet challenged machines

2010-03-21 Thread Dixon, Stephen
Hi everyone, first post... I've been trying for a while to get the IT department at work to open up port 873 so that macports could work there, but to no avail. Then I saw a post on the mailing list that explained how to collect the distfiles and other stuff needed to run macports without an in

Re: Encountering error in upgrade of subversion

2010-03-21 Thread Kok-Yong Tan
On Mar 21, 2010, at 22:59, Daniel J. Luke wrote: On Mar 21, 2010, at 3:33 PM, Kok-Yong Tan wrote: No, what I meant is that I had to "manually" install ruby by doing "port -v install ruby" before doing "port -v install subversion" and that "port -v install subversion" didn't seem to automati

Re: Encountering error in upgrade of subversion

2010-03-21 Thread Daniel J. Luke
On Mar 21, 2010, at 3:33 PM, Kok-Yong Tan wrote: > No, what I meant is that I had to "manually" install ruby by doing "port -v > install ruby" before doing "port -v install subversion" and that "port -v > install subversion" didn't seem to automatically chain to an installation of > ruby. If I

Re: is there a macport for xvidcap?

2010-03-21 Thread Frank Schima
On Mar 21, 2010, at 4:58 PM, Norman Khine wrote: > hello, is there a macport for xvidcap? > thanks "port search xvidcap" returns nothing. So no. You can file a trac ticket requesting it [1], but unless you actually submit a portfile, don't expect much to happen. Even the submissions queue [2]

RE: Re: New user, port selfupdate error

2010-03-21 Thread t...@qx.net
Hello, I wasn't sure whether I was suppose wait for something to be done that was suppose to be done, or install the patch, so I decided to install the batch, and, the following happened after downloading what I thought to be the proper patch: ---

Re: Warning: Skipping upgrade

2010-03-21 Thread Brandon Allbery
On Mar 21, 2010, at 19:14 , Mark Hattam wrote: I don't understand which port was skipped in the upgrading ... all four items that were outdated now appear to be "active". If I run a subsequent "port outdated" nothing needs doing. (...) Warning: Skipping upgrade since libtool 2.2.6b_1 >= libto

Warning: Skipping upgrade

2010-03-21 Thread Mark Hattam
I don't understand which port was skipped in the upgrading ... all four items that were outdated now appear to be "active". If I run a subsequent "port outdated" nothing needs doing. iMac:~ mark$ sudo port outdated The following installed ports are outdated: bash 4.0.3

is there a macport for xvidcap?

2010-03-21 Thread Norman Khine
hello, is there a macport for xvidcap? thanks -- %>>> "".join( [ {'*':'@','^':'.'}.get(c,None) or chr(97+(ord(c)-83)%26) for c in ",adym,*)&uzq^zqf" ] ) ___ macports-users mailing list macports-users@lists.macosforge.org http://lists.macosforge.org/mailm

Re: Encountering error in upgrade of subversion

2010-03-21 Thread Kok-Yong Tan
On Mar 21, 2010, at 13:13, Ryan Schmidt wrote: On Mar 21, 2010, at 00:52, Kok-Yong Tan wrote: On Mar 20, 2010, at 16:22, Rainer Müller wrote: sudo port deactivate cyrus-sasl2 sudo port clean cyrus-sasl2 sudo port upgrade cyrus-sasl2 Many thanks for the reply. I did as you recommended

Re: Encountering error in upgrade of subversion

2010-03-21 Thread Kok-Yong Tan
On Mar 21, 2010, at 11:22, Daniel J. Luke wrote: On Mar 21, 2010, at 1:52 AM, Kok-Yong Tan wrote: I noticed that despite it also making the same complaint about ruby being too outdated for subversion 1.6.5 to use, the build had continued until it crapped out about an hour later instead of

g95 netcdf / mac architectures

2010-03-21 Thread Felipe Pimenta
Dear users, I've installed g95 and netcdf in two macs. The first is a MacBook Pro (Intel 2.53 GHz) with Mac OS X 10.6.2. After installation I obtain: $port installed g95 @0.91_2+darwin_10+gcc42 (active) netcdf @4.1_1+g95 (active) The second mac is PowerPC G5, 2.5 GHz with Mac OS X 10.5.8. The

Re: Encountering error in upgrade of subversion

2010-03-21 Thread Ryan Schmidt
On Mar 21, 2010, at 00:52, Kok-Yong Tan wrote: > On Mar 20, 2010, at 16:22, Rainer Müller wrote: > >> sudo port deactivate cyrus-sasl2 >> sudo port clean cyrus-sasl2 >> sudo port upgrade cyrus-sasl2 > > Many thanks for the reply. I did as you recommended and that got me over > that obstacle

Re: Encountering error in upgrade of subversion

2010-03-21 Thread Daniel J. Luke
On Mar 21, 2010, at 1:52 AM, Kok-Yong Tan wrote: > I noticed that despite it also making the same complaint about ruby being > too outdated for subversion 1.6.5 to use, the build had continued until it > crapped out about an hour later instead of acknowledging the critical > dependency on ruby

Re: qt4-mac 4.6.2_1 fails to build on G4 PPC

2010-03-21 Thread Ryan Schmidt
On Mar 20, 2010, at 22:20, Kastus Shchuka wrote: > On Mar 20, 2010, at 6:32 PM, Ryan Schmidt wrote: > >> On Mar 20, 2010, at 14:03, Kastus Shchuka wrote: >> >>> I forgot to mention that despite libevent mentioned in conflicts lint in >>> the qt4-mac port file, port command did not produce any e

Re: curl: pass --with-random=/dev/urandom to configure - manually

2010-03-21 Thread Ryan Schmidt
On Mar 21, 2010, at 03:50, Wolf Drechsel wrote: > I failed to build curl, cc'ed that ticket: > > http://trac.macports.org/ticket/24059 > > As a workaround it is suggested to pass --with-random=/dev/urandom manually > to configure. As on my machine /dev/urandom exists, I dont have to carry out

curl: pass --with-random=/dev/urandom to configure - manually

2010-03-21 Thread Wolf Drechsel
Hi, I failed to build curl, cc'ed that ticket: http://trac.macports.org/ticket/24059 As a workaround it is suggested to pass --with-random=/dev/urandom manually to configure. As on my machine /dev/urandom exists, I dont have to carry out that test. I did fetch, checksum, extract patch ma

Re: 3-way universal support?

2010-03-21 Thread Joshua Root
On 2010-3-21 09:49 , Michael_google gmail_Gersten wrote: > Will macports ever support a three-way universal, for the following systems: > > 1. PPC/10.5.8 > 2. i386/10.5.8 > 3. x64/10.6.2 > > Obviously, 10.5.8 systems cannot compile for case #3, but a 10.6.2 > system should (in theory) be able to