On Nov 26, 2011, at 09:29, Roger Pack wrote:
> I've noticed that the default reply recipient for messages generated
> from the MacPorts Users mailing list is "just" the person that
> actually sent the message. This causes grief when you hit reply,
> thinking it will go to the ML, but end up just
On Sat, Nov 26, 2011 at 9:46 AM, Phillip Koebbe
wrote:
> I was incorrect. Apparently Google Groups just replaces the Reply-To and
> leaves the From intact. I agree with both of you about being able to see who
> the knowledgable ones are and that it's nice to pick them out quickly (I do
> this a
On Nov 26, 2011, at 09:30, Roger Pack wrote:
> Another thing (while we're on the subject) that I noticed is that,
> given the following deps:
>
> $ port deps mplayer-edl
> Full Name: mplayer-edl @34269_1
> Fetch Dependencies: subversion, git-core
> Build Dependencies: pkgconfig, yasm
> Libra
On Nov 26, 2011, at 10:22, Tim Johnson wrote:
> I've made several attempts to install abiword, both with macports
> and have also tried a couple of binaries that I downloaded.
> All (including the macports build) are for PowerPC.
> Is there a variant that will allow me to build abiwork for my in
On Nov 26, 2011, at 11:04 AM, Phil Dobbin wrote:
> On 26/11/11 16:53, "Harald Hanche-Olsen" wrote:
>
>> I would find it extremely annoying myself. After being on a mailing list for
>> a
>> while, you begin to learn the names of those most likely to write useful
>> posts. Being able to pick the
On 26/11/11 16:53, "Harald Hanche-Olsen" wrote:
> I would find it extremely annoying myself. After being on a mailing list for a
> while, you begin to learn the names of those most likely to write useful
> posts. Being able to pick them out at a glance without going into each message
> is quite u
[Phillip Koebbe (2011-11-26 16:37:22 UTC)]
> Or to use the mailing list's address as the from? I believe that's what
> Google Groups does: You get the message from the same address you send one
> to. In my experience, that seems to work out well. And there is the added
> benefit that we are no
On Nov 26, 2011, at 10:19 AM, Lawrence Velázquez wrote:
> Could Mailman be configured to set the Reply-To header to the mailing list
> address? Theoretically.
>
Or to use the mailing list's address as the from? I believe that's what Google
Groups does: You get the message from the same addres
I've made several attempts to install abiword, both with macports
and have also tried a couple of binaries that I downloaded.
All (including the macports build) are for PowerPC.
Is there a variant that will allow me to build abiwork for my intel
mac? (2011 Mac Mini, Lion)
thanks
--
Tim
tim at t
[Roger Pack (2011-11-26 15:48:43 UTC)]
> > This can usually be set as default by any decent MUA.
>
> I'm sure it can. Wouldn't you agree that it would be more convenient,
> perhaps, for it not to have to be set by each new participant?
You seem to be asking for the mailing list to set the Repl
Could Mailman be configured to set the Reply-To header to the mailing list
address? Theoretically.
vq
On Nov 26, 2011, at 10:55 AM, Phil Dobbin wrote:
> On 26/11/11 15:48, "Roger Pack" wrote:
>
>> I'm sure it can. Wouldn't you agree that it would be more convenient,
>> perhaps, for it not t
[Brandon Allbery (2011-11-26 15:46:34 UTC)]
> On Sat, Nov 26, 2011 at 08:42, Harald Hanche-Olsen wrote:
>
> > syscall::connect*:entry
> > syscall::connect*:return
> >
>
> I wonder if there's a better way to do that, in particular avoiding the
> wildcards; I would suspect it ends up waking up on
On 26/11/11 15:48, "Roger Pack" wrote:
> I'm sure it can. Wouldn't you agree that it would be more convenient,
> perhaps, for it not to have to be set by each new participant?
Depends on how you configure your MUA.
I'm sure there's probably a RFC floating about somewhere that deals with
this s
On 26/11/11 15:48, "Roger Pack" wrote:
> Oops accidentally responded to individual only. (no, really I did).
I can vouch for that ;-)...
Cheers,
Phil...
--
Nothing to see here... move along, move along
___
macports-users mailing list
macports-
Oops accidentally responded to individual only. (no, really I did).
-- Forwarded message --
> This can usually be set as default by any decent MUA.
I'm sure it can. Wouldn't you agree that it would be more convenient,
perhaps, for it not to have to be set by each new participant?
On Sat, Nov 26, 2011 at 08:42, Harald Hanche-Olsen wrote:
> syscall::connect*:entry
> syscall::connect*:return
>
I wonder if there's a better way to do that, in particular avoiding the
wildcards; I would suspect it ends up waking up on *every* syscall to do
the glob, which on a system-wide basis
On 26/11/11 15:29, "Roger Pack" wrote:
> Hello all.
> I've noticed that the default reply recipient for messages generated
> from the MacPorts Users mailing list is "just" the person that
> actually sent the message. This causes grief when you hit reply,
> thinking it will go to the ML, but end
On Sat, Nov 26, 2011 at 05:10, Kraus Philipp wrote:
> Am 26.11.2011 um 00:38 schrieb Brandon Allbery:
>
> Do you by any chance have a ~/.MacOSX/environment.plist file? If so, is
> it trying to set $PATH?
>
>
> Yes, I have changed the PATH, but I have tested with and without the
> environment.plis
On Sat, Nov 26, 2011 at 05:53, Harald Hanche-Olsen wrote:
> Trying that now, it didn't make any difference. Where could I found
> out about options such as build.njobs, BTW? I looked around to verify
> that you did RC, but to no avail.
>
http://guide.macports.org/#reference
(Which could use eith
Forwarding to the ML since I accidentally hit send to just the sender...
-- Forwarded message --
From: Roger Pack
Date: Sat, Nov 26, 2011 at 8:26 AM
Subject: Re: port pkg doesn't include dependencies?
> In case you didn't see Ryan's response:
>
> port mpkg PORTNAME
Ok thank you
Hello all.
I've noticed that the default reply recipient for messages generated
from the MacPorts Users mailing list is "just" the person that
actually sent the message. This causes grief when you hit reply,
thinking it will go to the ML, but end up just sending a personal
reply on accident.
I'm s
I found out what has been biting me. I had been running a dtrace
script in the background to record all tcp connections in a file.
After I removed that, updating ports is so much snappier I can't
believe it.
According to the hype, dtrace is not supposed to affect system
performance, or at lea
[Jeremy Lavergne (2011-11-25 20:25:46 UTC)]
> > MacBook Pro, 2.66 GHz Intel Core 2 Duo, 8 GB RAM
>
> Looks like build.macports.org is a quad core Xeon Xserve running 2.0, 2.66 or
> 3.0 GHz. If you have some ports that cannot be built in parallel, it should
> give you a reasonable comparison.
>
[Brandon Allbery (2011-11-25 20:50:21 UTC)]
> On Fri, Nov 25, 2011 at 15:08, Harald Hanche-Olsen wrote:
>
> > I have no idea what mach_kernel`chud is or does, but it disappears from
> > the list when the compilation is stopped. (So do the dtrace functions,
> > BTW.) The script runs for ten secon
Am 26.11.2011 um 00:38 schrieb Brandon Allbery:
> On Fri, Nov 25, 2011 at 18:26, Kraus Philipp
> wrote:
> I have run the pkg with the installer tool on a terminal the call does not
> create any error. If I run the package via double click the error
> "sed / uname not found" is shown.
>
> Do y
On Nov 26, 2011, at 01:30, Peter wrote:
> Here is the error from atk/main.log:
>
> :info:build In file included from ../atk/atkobject.h:28,
> :info:build from atkaction.h:27,
> :info:build from atkaction.c:20:
> :info:build ../atk/atkstate.h:173: error: syntax e
Hmmm... I installed Spyder via Macports and it installed pretty well everything
I want. So why did I bother with Enthought, you ask. Good question :-)
The only benefit is that the Enthought distro installs very quickly.
Spyder from the command line runs the system python (or python), not the
27 matches
Mail list logo
