Re: spe for Python 2.7?

2012-03-23 Thread Dave Curtis
On Mar 22, 2012, at 6:05 PM, Lawrence Velázquez wrote: On Mar 22, 2012, at 7:41 p.m., Ryan Schmidt wrote: On Mar 22, 2012, at 18:34, Dave Curtis wrote: OK. Agreement all around. Yay! So... does that mean there *should* be py26-spe and py27-spe, etc, ports? No. Spe is not a python

Re: port install wxwidgets on mnt lion fails

2012-03-23 Thread Jyrki Wahlstedt
Hi, as you certainly know, ML is not a released product, hence it will not be discussed in public, and also, unfortunately I don't have such a system available in order to give any support in private! br, ! ! Jyrki On 23.3.2012, at 4.45, Wes James compte...@gmail.com wrote: I'm trying to

xorg-libxcb update pegging CPU running dot processes ?

2012-03-23 Thread Chris Jones
Hi, The latest update to xorg-libxcb has been going on for well over an hour now on my MBPro, and it appears to be due to dot processes. Is this normal ? Chris smime.p7s Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature ___ macports-users mailing list

Re: xorg-libxcb update pegging CPU running dot processes ?

2012-03-23 Thread Chris Jones
Hi, In the end I killed the build, as I got bored waiting. It appears the problem was a doxygen documentation build…. Wouldn't it make sense to have this as an option, disabled by default ? Personally really have no need for any documentation for this port … Chris On 23 Mar 2012, at 12:22pm,

Re: xorg-libxcb update pegging CPU running dot processes ?

2012-03-23 Thread Lawrence Velázquez
On Mar 23, 2012, at 9:04 a.m., Chris Jones wrote: It appears the problem was a doxygen documentation build…. Wouldn't it make sense to have this as an option, disabled by default ? Personally really have no need for any documentation for this port … That's odd. Upgrade xorg-libxcb built

Re: xorg-libxcb update pegging CPU running dot processes ?

2012-03-23 Thread Jeremy Lavergne
That's odd. Upgrade xorg-libxcb built in less than 2 minutes for me, and there is no doc build because I don't have doxygen installed. Sounds like a missing dependency on doxygen. File a ticket and cc the maintainer so they can control the doc building. smime.p7s Description: S/MIME

Re: xorg-libxcb update pegging CPU running dot processes ?

2012-03-23 Thread Chris Jones
Hi, Yes, I do have MacPort's doxygen installed. Sounds to me though adding a dependency on doxygen would only currently make things worse, as everyone would then have this issue…. I would say installed the doc build should be optional, and disabled by default…. I'll file a ticket. cheers

Re: xorg-libxcb update pegging CPU running dot processes ?

2012-03-23 Thread Chris Jones
Hi, https://trac.macports.org/ticket/33737 Indeed, uninstalling doxygen then running the update fixed the problem. Chris On 23 Mar 2012, at 1:34pm, Chris Jones wrote: Hi, Yes, I do have MacPort's doxygen installed. Sounds to me though adding a dependency on doxygen would only currently

Re: spe for Python 2.7?

2012-03-23 Thread Dave Curtis
On Mar 22, 2012, at 11:46 PM, Dave Curtis wrote: On Mar 22, 2012, at 6:05 PM, Lawrence Velázquez wrote: On Mar 22, 2012, at 7:41 p.m., Ryan Schmidt wrote: On Mar 22, 2012, at 18:34, Dave Curtis wrote: OK. Agreement all around. Yay! So... does that mean there *should* be

Re: spe for Python 2.7?

2012-03-23 Thread Dave Curtis
On Mar 23, 2012, at 11:10 AM, Dave Curtis wrote: spe needs to run 32 bit, since it uses wx. There is no reason it should force the code under development to run 32 bit, unless the user has a good reason to make that happen. I'm thinking that for both idle and spe, the sub-shelled

Re: FOSS cross-platform data drive encryption

2012-03-23 Thread Gary Little
My first thought is to go buy an FDE (full disk encryption) hard disk. Both Seagate and Hitachi have them. That is probably the most reliable means of transporting encrypted data across platforms. But that is outside a MacPorts solution. Gary Little H (952) 223-1349 C (952) 454-4629

Re: FOSS cross-platform data drive encryption

2012-03-23 Thread Sam Kuper
On 23 March 2012 19:17, Gary Little gglit...@comcast.net wrote: My first thought is to go buy an FDE (full disk encryption) hard disk. Both Seagate and Hitachi have them. That is probably the most reliable means of transporting encrypted data across platforms. Interesting. Do any of these

Re: FOSS cross-platform data drive encryption

2012-03-23 Thread Sam Kuper
On 23 March 2012 19:24, Sam Kuper sam.ku...@uclmail.net wrote: On 23 March 2012 19:17, Gary Little gglit...@comcast.net wrote: My first thought is to go buy an FDE (full disk encryption) hard disk. Both Seagate and Hitachi have them. That is probably the most reliable means of transporting

Re: FOSS cross-platform data drive encryption

2012-03-23 Thread Gary Little
They are hard drives. Plug them into any SAS or SATA controller and they will be look like any hard drive, work like any hard drive, and will be recognized by any BIOS or EFI that I know of, until you configure them to enable FDE, which is supported by both T10 and T13 committees. Even as a

Re: FOSS cross-platform data drive encryption

2012-03-23 Thread Daniel J. Luke
On Mar 23, 2012, at 3:35 PM, Sam Kuper wrote: Hm, it's not just the firmware that's in question. To use the Seagate FDE drives on a Mac, one has to use Seagate Secure software, too, which is proprietary: http://knowledge.seagate.com/articles/en_US/FAQ/206011en#4 I haven't yet been able to

Re: port install wxwidgets on mnt lion fails

2012-03-23 Thread Ryan Schmidt
On Mar 22, 2012, at 21:45, Wes James wrote: I'm trying to install wxwidgets on mtn lion. It fails Not surprising at all, since we've had problems building wxWidgets since Snow Leopard already: https://trac.macports.org/ticket/20952 with this at the end of the log: :info:build In file

Re: Problem with build 32bit apache+php52+mysql ports.

2012-03-23 Thread Ryan Schmidt
On Mar 22, 2012, at 20:52, Weichun Qian wrote: I was forced to build 32 bit apache+php52+mysql as I am being evaluating a ZendOptimized php software. ZendOptimizer has only 32bit, you know, and it can work with php52. I have successfully built them, but I cannot get out where the

Re: spe for Python 2.7?

2012-03-23 Thread Ryan Schmidt
On Mar 23, 2012, at 01:46, Dave Curtis wrote: 2. added supported_arches i386 because of wx dependency 4. tweaked call to python to use arch -i386, which was conveniently already being patched in the portfile. This was moved to a post-patch to get out of the way of a new patchfile. These

Re: FOSS cross-platform data drive encryption

2012-03-23 Thread Sam Kuper
On 23 March 2012 19:43, Gary Little gglit...@comcast.net wrote: They are hard drives. Plug them into any SAS or SATA controller and they will be look like any hard drive, work like any hard drive, and will be recognized by any BIOS or EFI that I know of, until you configure them to enable

Re: FOSS cross-platform data drive encryption

2012-03-23 Thread Sam Kuper
On 23 March 2012 19:44, Daniel J. Luke dl...@geeklair.net wrote: On Mar 23, 2012, at 3:35 PM, Sam Kuper wrote: Hm, it's not just the firmware that's in question. To use the Seagate FDE drives on a Mac, one has to use Seagate Secure software, too, which is proprietary:

Re: FOSS cross-platform data drive encryption

2012-03-23 Thread Adam Dershowitz
On Mar 23, 2012, at 11:03 AM, Sam Kuper wrote: Forgive the cross-posting. I've already asked this question on superuser.com, but I figure that the sets of MacPorts-Users mailing list subscribers and superuser.com users might not overlap very far. The question is: Is there any dependable

Re: FOSS cross-platform data drive encryption

2012-03-23 Thread Sam Kuper
On 23 March 2012 20:35, Adam Dershowitz de...@alum.mit.edu wrote: Will truecrypt (http://www.truecrypt.org/)  do what you need? TrueCrypt isn't FOSS. Sam ___ macports-users mailing list macports-users@lists.macosforge.org

Re: spe for Python 2.7?

2012-03-23 Thread Dave Curtis
On Mar 23, 2012, at 1:00 PM, Ryan Schmidt wrote: On Mar 23, 2012, at 01:46, Dave Curtis wrote: 2. added supported_arches i386 because of wx dependency 4. tweaked call to python to use arch -i386, which was conveniently already being patched in the portfile. This was moved to a

Re: FOSS cross-platform data drive encryption

2012-03-23 Thread Gary Little
Ok … then things have changed since I was working on the initial trusted and FDE drives 8 years ago. My apologies if I misdirected things. Gary Little H (952) 223-1349 C (952) 454-4629 gglit...@comcast.net On Mar 23, 2012, at 3:30 PM, Sam Kuper wrote: On 23 March 2012 19:43, Gary Little

Re: FOSS cross-platform data drive encryption

2012-03-23 Thread Adam Dershowitz
On Mar 23, 2012, at 1:41 PM, Sam Kuper wrote: On 23 March 2012 20:35, Adam Dershowitz de...@alum.mit.edu wrote: Will truecrypt (http://www.truecrypt.org/) do what you need? TrueCrypt isn't FOSS. They claim it is on their web site. I see that the sourcecode is there, although I

Re: port install wxwidgets on mnt lion fails

2012-03-23 Thread Wes James
On Fri, Mar 23, 2012 at 1:48 PM, Ryan Schmidt ryandes...@macports.org wrote: On Mar 22, 2012, at 21:45, Wes James wrote: I'm trying to install wxwidgets on mtn lion.  It fails Not surprising at all, since we've had problems building wxWidgets since Snow Leopard already:

Re: spe for Python 2.7?

2012-03-23 Thread Ryan Schmidt
On Mar 23, 2012, at 15:42, Dave Curtis wrote: On Mar 23, 2012, at 1:00 PM, Ryan Schmidt wrote: On Mar 23, 2012, at 01:46, Dave Curtis wrote: 2. added supported_arches i386 because of wx dependency 4. tweaked call to python to use arch -i386, which was conveniently already being

Re: port install wxwidgets on mnt lion fails

2012-03-23 Thread Ryan Schmidt
On Mar 23, 2012, at 16:31, Wes James wrote: What I ended up doing is with a two partition disk (one for snow leo, one for mtn lion). I coped the /opt/local from one disk to the other Please don't; a MacPorts install is designed to be used on a single OS version only. When moving to a

AfterStep sound does now work

2012-03-23 Thread Richard Miles
I am on a slow leopard imac intel system. I have tried to get AfterStep window managers sound events to work without success. Please help Thanks Richard Miles r.godzi...@comcast.net ___ macports-users mailing list macports-users@lists.macosforge.org

Re: port install wxwidgets on mnt lion fails

2012-03-23 Thread Wes James
On Fri, Mar 23, 2012 at 3:41 PM, Ryan Schmidt ryandes...@macports.org wrote: On Mar 23, 2012, at 16:31, Wes James wrote: What I ended up doing is with a two partition disk (one for snow leo, one for mtn lion).  I coped the /opt/local from one disk to the other Please don't; a MacPorts

Re: spe for Python 2.7?

2012-03-23 Thread Dave Curtis
On Mar 23, 2012, at 2:40 PM, Ryan Schmidt wrote For #4, would it be correct to choose the patch conditioned on the build arch? Basically, leave off the 'arch -i386' part of the patch for ppc? If we're getting into the business of patching in arch commands to run programs under a

Does MacPort come with an alternative GCC for compiling Ruby 1.8.7 with RVM

2012-03-23 Thread Behrang Saeedzadeh
Hi all, As you know Ruby1.8.7 cannot be compiled with XCode 4.2 unless it is an upgrade from an earlier version. Some users are using https://github.com/kennethreitz/osx-gcc-installer in order to be able to compile Ruby 1.8.7. Is there something similar in MacPorts that can help with this

Re: Does MacPort come with an alternative GCC for compiling Ruby 1.8.7 with RVM

2012-03-23 Thread Lawrence Velázquez
On Mar 23, 2012, at 10:44 p.m., Behrang Saeedzadeh wrote: As you know Ruby1.8.7 cannot be compiled with XCode 4.2 unless it is an upgrade from an earlier version. I actually did not know this. Is there something similar in MacPorts that can help with this situation? Yes. If you try to

Re: Does MacPort come with an alternative GCC for compiling Ruby 1.8.7 with RVM

2012-03-23 Thread Jeff Singleton
You can use configure.cc /usr/bin/gcc-4.2 that's what I had to do. http://guide.macports.org/index.html#reference.phases.configure On Fri, Mar 23, 2012 at 9:44 PM, Behrang Saeedzadeh behran...@gmail.comwrote: Hi all, As you know Ruby1.8.7 cannot be compiled with XCode 4.2 unless it is an

Re: Does MacPort come with an alternative GCC for compiling Ruby 1.8.7 with RVM

2012-03-23 Thread Behrang Saeedzadeh
Hi all, Thanks for the replies. So to be more precise, Ruby 1.8.7 cannot be compiled with Clang. Does MacPorts install a non-Clang GCC then that I can use to compile Ruby 1.8.7? Cheers, Behrang Saeedzadeh http://www.behrang.org On Sat, Mar 24, 2012 at 2:08 PM, Lawrence Velázquez

Re: Does MacPort come with an alternative GCC for compiling Ruby 1.8.7 with RVM

2012-03-23 Thread Behrang Saeedzadeh
Hi Lawrence, Yes, I want to compile Ruby myself. Or to be more precise, I want RVM to compile Rubies for me. RVM allows you to specify which compiler to use as well. Also looks like the non-Apple versions of GCC are not compilable on Lion anymore: sudo port install gcc42 Password: --- Fetching

Re: Does MacPort come with an alternative GCC for compiling Ruby 1.8.7 with RVM

2012-03-23 Thread Ryan Schmidt
On Mar 24, 2012, at 00:27, Behrang Saeedzadeh wrote: Also looks like the non-Apple versions of GCC are not compilable on Lion anymore: sudo port install gcc42 Password: --- Fetching archive for gcc42 --- Attempting to fetch gcc42-4.2.4_2.darwin_11.x86_64.tbz2 from