Re: Problem with gcc4.7 and call_once

2013-08-09 Thread Jeremy Huddleston Sequoia
On Aug 8, 2013, at 20:22, Brian D. McGrew br...@visionpro.com wrote: Major updateŠ Is ok, I can reinstall if I hosed it all :) Download gcc-4.8.1.tar.bz2 from gnu and untar into ~/toolchain (no ports patches added to source). Configure as follows (shown below). Make check, make

Re: homebrew and macports together?

2013-08-09 Thread Chris Jones
Create a homebrew port of awesome. That way, not only will you get what you wanted, but everyone will benefit from the fruits of your labor. ... or take the more enlightened route and switch to using exclusively MacPorts ;) Is there anything Homebrew has than MP doesn't ?

Re: Problem with gcc4.7 and call_once

2013-08-09 Thread Brian D. McGrew
Well I could be going in the wrong direction, I'm not the foremost expert on ports yet, but what I do know is this: If I port edit gcc48 and add --enable-libstdcxx-threads and then port install -s gcc48, when I run gcc -v I do see the option that I just added. No question, the option IS there.

Re: homebrew and macports together?

2013-08-09 Thread Mark Anderson
:) Not much, if any. But the reverse is constantly true. LaTeX is the one that got me to convert people in the CS department. —Mark ___ Mark E. Anderson e...@emer.net On Fri, Aug 9, 2013 at 7:08 AM, Chris Jones jon...@hep.phy.cam.ac.ukwrote: Create a homebrew port of

Re: homebrew and macports together?

2013-08-09 Thread Bradley Giesbrecht
Please enlighten, convert people to what and why? Regards, Bradley Giesbrecht (pixilla) On Aug 9, 2013, at 6:32 AM, Mark Anderson wrote: :) Not much, if any. But the reverse is constantly true. LaTeX is the one that got me to convert people in the CS department. —Mark

Re: Problem with gcc4.7 and call_once

2013-08-09 Thread Jeremy Huddleston Sequoia
On Aug 9, 2013, at 6:27, Brian D. McGrew br...@visionpro.com wrote: Well I could be going in the wrong direction, I'm not the foremost expert on ports yet, but what I do know is this: If I port edit gcc48 and add --enable-libstdcxx-threads and then port install -s gcc48, when I run gcc -v

Re: Problem with gcc4.7 and call_once

2013-08-09 Thread Brian D. McGrew
Appreciate the help! In the meantime, I'Ll keep my original /opt/local tarred up and saved and use my hand cranked gcc, as it seems to work just fine. It's just an out-of-tree build as you said. -b On 8/9/13 8:17 AM, Jeremy Huddleston Sequoia jerem...@macports.org wrote: On Aug 9, 2013, at

Re: Problem with gcc4.7 and call_once

2013-08-09 Thread Brian D. McGrew
One more questionŠ you know a lot more about port than I so I have a no reason to doubt when you say it's on by default. But in the port installed versions when I do a gcc-mp -v, I do not see --enable-libstdcxx-threads in the configured line. When I do the same on my hand cranked version, I do

Re: Problem with gcc4.7 and call_once

2013-08-09 Thread Jeremy Huddleston Sequoia
On Aug 9, 2013, at 8:23, Brian D. McGrew br...@visionpro.com wrote: One more questionŠ you know a lot more about port than I so I have a no reason to doubt when you say it's on by default. But in the port installed versions when I do a gcc-mp -v, I do not see --enable-libstdcxx-threads in

Re: Problem with gcc4.7 and call_once

2013-08-09 Thread David Barto
So why does building the code from scratch with the --enable-libstdcxx-threads flag work, and not when using the port or when the port file configuration adds that option? Jeremy has shown that the MP version does not work for std::call_once, and gcc.org has results showing that it works fine

Re: homebrew and macports together?

2013-08-09 Thread Jeremy Lavergne
He converted people to MacPorts because we have what Homebrew does not (that, and, you know, being a package manager). Please enlighten, convert people to what and why? :) Not much, if any. But the reverse is constantly true. LaTeX is the one that got me to convert people in the CS

python bindings for gconf?

2013-08-09 Thread Sterling Smith
List, I am looking for a port that provides python bindings for gconf (i.e. import gconf). Does it exist? Thanks, Sterling ___ macports-users mailing list macports-users@lists.macosforge.org

Re: python bindings for gconf?

2013-08-09 Thread Ryan Schmidt
On Aug 9, 2013, at 14:00, Sterling Smith wrote: I am looking for a port that provides python bindings for gconf (i.e. import gconf). Does it exist? Based on what I see when I port search gconf, I don't think so. But if python bindings exist for gconf, then you could create a port for it.

Re: python bindings for gconf?

2013-08-09 Thread Sterling Smith
On Aug 9, 2013, at 12:08PM, Ryan Schmidt wrote: On Aug 9, 2013, at 14:00, Sterling Smith wrote: I am looking for a port that provides python bindings for gconf (i.e. import gconf). Does it exist? Based on what I see when I port search gconf, I don't think so. But if python

Re: Problem with gcc4.7 and call_once

2013-08-09 Thread Brian D. McGrew
In case anyone is interested, you the following to build gcc-4.8.1 from source using gcc-mp-48: CC=/opt/local/bin/gcc-mp-4.8 CXX=/opt/local/bin/g++-mp-4.8 ../configure --prefix=/opt/local --build=x86_64-apple-darwin12 --enable-languages=c,c++,objc,obj-c++,lot,fortran,java

Re: Problem with gcc4.7 and call_once

2013-08-09 Thread Ryan Schmidt
On Aug 9, 2013, at 14:36, Brian D. McGrew br...@visionpro.com wrote: In case anyone is interested, you the following to build gcc-4.8.1 from source using gcc-mp-48: CC=/opt/local/bin/gcc-mp-4.8 CXX=/opt/local/bin/g++-mp-4.8 ../configure --prefix=/opt/local --build=x86_64-apple-darwin12

Re: Problem with gcc4.7 and call_once

2013-08-09 Thread Brian D. McGrew
Well I had to port install gcc48 to build gcc-4.8.1 from source. Using /usrŠgcc didn't get me there. So installing port gcc48, building gcc-4.8.1 from source in ~ and installing over the top of port installed gcc worked (backing up /opt/local of course). Circular for sure, but effective. I did

Re: Problem with gcc4.7 and call_once

2013-08-09 Thread Ryan Schmidt
On Aug 9, 2013, at 15:06, Brian D. McGrew br...@visionpro.com wrote: Well I had to port install gcc48 to build gcc-4.8.1 from source. Using /usrŠgcc didn't get me there. So installing port gcc48, building gcc-4.8.1 from source in ~ and installing over the top of port installed gcc worked

Re: Problem with gcc4.7 and call_once

2013-08-09 Thread Daniel J. Luke
On Aug 9, 2013, at 4:12 PM, Ryan Schmidt ryandes...@macports.org wrote: On Aug 9, 2013, at 15:06, Brian D. McGrew br...@visionpro.com wrote: Well I had to port install gcc48 to build gcc-4.8.1 from source. Using /usrŠgcc didn't get me there. So installing port gcc48, building gcc-4.8.1 from

Re: Problem with gcc4.7 and call_once

2013-08-09 Thread Jeremy Huddleston Sequoia
We don't really need to continue this thread. I have reproduced the issue and think I have a workaround. Feel free to file a ticket and assign it to me if you want to continue this thread in a more appropriate venue (mailing list chatter gets lost more easily than bug reports). Thanks,

Re: Problem with gcc4.7 and call_once

2013-08-09 Thread David Barto
Can I get Brian and me on the open bug ticket as cc members? David On Aug 9, 2013, at 1:24 PM, Jeremy Huddleston Sequoia jerem...@macports.org wrote: We don't really need to continue this thread. I have reproduced the issue and think I have a workaround. Feel free to file a ticket

Re: Problem with gcc4.7 and call_once

2013-08-09 Thread Watson Ladd
Would mp-gcc-4.7 work as the start rather than 4.8? On Fri, Aug 9, 2013 at 4:30 PM, David Barto dba...@visionpro.com wrote: Can I get Brian and me on the open bug ticket as cc members? David On Aug 9, 2013, at 1:24 PM, Jeremy Huddleston Sequoia jerem...@macports.org wrote:

Re: Problem with gcc4.7 and call_once

2013-08-09 Thread Ryan Schmidt
On Aug 9, 2013, at 15:47, Watson Ladd wrote: Would mp-gcc-4.7 work as the start rather than 4.8? Given the subject of this thread, I thought gcc47 was also affected. ___ macports-users mailing list macports-users@lists.macosforge.org

Re: Problem with gcc4.7 and call_once

2013-08-09 Thread Jeremy Huddleston Sequoia
Your use of gcc-4.8 in the working case is a red haring. That is unrelated. --Jeremy On Aug 9, 2013, at 13:47, Watson Ladd watsonbl...@gmail.com wrote: Would mp-gcc-4.7 work as the start rather than 4.8? On Fri, Aug 9, 2013 at 4:30 PM, David Barto dba...@visionpro.com wrote: Can I get

Re: Problem with gcc4.7 and call_once

2013-08-09 Thread Jeremy Huddleston Sequoia
On Aug 9, 2013, at 13:17, Daniel J. Luke dl...@geeklair.net wrote: On Aug 9, 2013, at 4:12 PM, Ryan Schmidt ryandes...@macports.org wrote: On Aug 9, 2013, at 15:06, Brian D. McGrew br...@visionpro.com wrote: Well I had to port install gcc48 to build gcc-4.8.1 from source. Using /usrŠgcc