ok. my 2 cents after quick reading this long thread
- clearly, submission should be asked on install of macports, either opt-in
or opt-out. I'm pretty sure It's a legal constraint in some places (like
european union). w opt-in, there is a risk to have little people but it's
probably cleaner.
It wo
Hi,
> It would probably make sense to discuss and collect different ideas
> somewhere (it could be Trac, but it's probably suboptimal at this
> early stage of brainstorming where lots and lots of ideas could be
> discussed, prioritized, written down, ...).
I think we can keep discussing things on
On Tue, Mar 25, 2014 at 8:44 AM, Nicolas Pavillon <
pavillon.nico...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > How come Linux distributions can provide binary packages for kdepim?
> I am not sure about that. The thing is that most of openssl use from KDE
> is swept under the carpet by avoiding any standard linking (o
Hello,
> How come Linux distributions can provide binary packages for kdepim?
I am not sure about that. The thing is that most of openssl use from KDE is
swept under the carpet by avoiding any standard linking (only linking at
runtime is used), and most project are moving to Qt SSL module inste
Hello,
> How come Linux distributions can provide binary packages for kdepim?
I am not sure about that. The thing is that most of openssl use from KDE is
swept under the carpet by avoiding any standard linking (only linking at
runtime is used), and most project are moving to Qt SSL module inste
On Mar 25, 2014, at 10:03, Ryan Schmidt wrote:
>
> The distcc port has no maintainer; nobody is looking after its interests. If
> we need to make a change to the port, please file a ticket to let us know,
> ideally supplying a unified diff of the needed changes. The port currently
> doesn’t se
On Mar 25, 2014, at 10:03, Ryan Schmidt wrote:
> The distcc port has no maintainer; nobody is looking after its interests. If
> we need to make a change to the port, please file a ticket to let us know,
> ideally supplying a unified diff of the needed changes. The port currently
> doesn’t seem
On Mar 25, 2014, at 03:16, René J.V. Bertin wrote:
> Since I discovered that clang can act as a cross-compiler (generating
> "foreign" object, .o , files), I have a renewed interest in distcc. I'm doing
> rather large builds on a Linux box, and the distcc I have on there is capable
> of a so-
Hello,
Since I discovered that clang can act as a cross-compiler (generating "foreign"
object, .o , files), I have a renewed interest in distcc. I'm doing rather
large builds on a Linux box, and the distcc I have on there is capable of a
so-called pump mode in which the precompile step is also
