Re: webkit2-gtk +quartz fails

To report a bug, follow the instructions in the guide: http://guide.macports.org/#project.tickets Error: Processing of port json-glib failed Andreas-Mac-mini:~ webreflection$ On Mon, May 9, 2016 at 9:37 PM, Andrea Giammarchi < andrea.giammar...@gmail.com> wrote: > Hi David. I think I need

Re: webkit2-gtk +quartz fails

webkit2-gtk failed Andreas-Mac-mini:~ webreflection$ Best Regards On Mon, May 9, 2016 at 3:51 PM, David Evans <dev...@macports.org> wrote: > On 5/9/16 1:28 AM, Andrea Giammarchi wrote: > > Apologies to bump this thread but it looks like now the build fails > after json-glib so w

Re: webkit2-gtk +quartz fails

Apologies to bump this thread but it looks like now the build fails after json-glib so webkit2-gtk +quartz still fails to build. Best Regards On Sun, May 8, 2016 at 10:10 AM, Andrea Giammarchi < andrea.giammar...@gmail.com> wrote: > It works just using quartz indeed, dunno where I

Re: WebKit2-GTK: quartz VS XQuartz

May 9, 2016 at 9:00 AM, Mojca Miklavec <mo...@macports.org> wrote: > On 8 May 2016 at 11:19, Andrea Giammarchi wrote: > > Like I've said, telling users they need to wait at least one hour to > > install and build gtk3 +quartz and webkit2-gtk +quartz due lack of pre > built &g

Re: WebKit2-GTK: quartz VS XQuartz

-GTK +quartz that on old Mac takes just about forever to build. On May 8, 2016 1:11 AM, "David Evans" <dev...@macports.org> wrote: > On 5/7/16 4:29 PM, Andrea Giammarchi wrote: > > I understand the combinatory logic of your answer, hence I'm saying > quartz variant sh

Re: webkit2-gtk +quartz fails

It works just using quartz indeed, dunno where I've found those variants. Thanks On May 8, 2016 1:19 AM, "David Evans" <dev...@macports.org> wrote: > On 5/6/16 8:09 AM, David Evans wrote: > > On 5/6/16 5:55 AM, Andrea Giammarchi wrote: > >> Hi there, > >&g

Re: WebKit2-GTK: quartz VS XQuartz

it ¯\_(ツ)_/¯ On May 7, 2016 6:20 PM, "Ryan Schmidt" <ryandes...@macports.org> wrote: > > On May 7, 2016, at 4:51 AM, Andrea Giammarchi wrote: > > > > I am not sure why there are no pre-built gtk3 +quartz and webkit2-gtk + > quartz ports available so, beside which wou

Re: WebKit2-GTK: quartz VS XQuartz

to not seeing much development on Darwin. Please consider this change, thanks. On May 7, 2016 2:50 PM, "Bachsau" <w...@bachsau.name> wrote: > Andrea Giammarchi wrote on 07.05.2016 11:51: > >> >> Thanks in advance for considering it, as a user it would be awesome

Re: WebKit2-GTK: quartz VS XQuartz

Dear all, sorry to bump this thread but I've finally managed to compare both webkit2gtk-gtk +quartz and default webkit2gtk-gtk +x11 just to understand what is the fuss about Quartz VS XQuartz and I've realized the former is definitively a better default but for some reason x11 is instead the

Re: webkit2-gtk +quartz fails

dev...@macports.org> wrote: > On 5/6/16 5:55 AM, Andrea Giammarchi wrote: > > Hi there, > > without adding any variant, I've tried to install the following: gtk3 > is OK, webkit2 is not. > > > > ```sh > > sudo port install gtk3 +quartz

webkit2-gtk +quartz fails

Hi there, without adding any variant, I've tried to install the following: gtk3 is OK, webkit2 is not. ```sh sudo port install gtk3 +quartz sudo port install webkit2-gtk +quartz ``` The unfortunate failure happens on `gstreamer1-gst-plugins-good`, which is built after `webkit2-gtk` is actually

Re: WebKit2-GTK: quartz VS XQuartz

Brandon if you're asking me I've no idea, I've done nothing more than `sudo port install ...`, and it's a fresh install. Indeed, as you can see, the instant after I've installed zlib writing exact same command but no dependencies and zero problems Andreas-Mac-mini:~ webreflection$ sudo port

Re: WebKit2-GTK: quartz VS XQuartz

Hi Ryan On Wed, Apr 6, 2016 at 5:46 AM, Ryan Schmidt <ryandes...@macports.org> wrote: > > On Apr 5, 2016, at 12:42 PM, Andrea Giammarchi wrote: > > > every single module was erroring when it was trying to fetch it. > > > You should be more specific

Re: WebKit2-GTK: quartz VS XQuartz

whole list of dependencies for epiphany. Best Regards On Tue, Apr 5, 2016 at 6:38 PM, Brandon Allbery <allber...@gmail.com> wrote: > On Tue, Apr 5, 2016 at 1:31 PM, Andrea Giammarchi < > andrea.giammar...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> `sudo port install epiphany` doesn't actually wo

Re: WebKit2-GTK: quartz VS XQuartz

What a convolute journey I had here ... will describe after replying: On Tue, Apr 5, 2016 at 12:10 AM, David Evans wrote: > > > Have you tried epiphany as your browser? I haven't tried it for the > examples that you mention but it uses WebKit2 via > X11 as well (but not

Re: About mozjs24 being built

clean installation of OSX El Captain ) Best Regards On Tue, Apr 5, 2016 at 5:49 AM, Ryan Schmidt <ryandes...@macports.org> wrote: > > On Apr 3, 2016, at 10:22 AM, Andrea Giammarchi wrote: > > > It looks like installing `xorg-server` and `xinit` won't solve the > problem;

Re: WebKit2-GTK: quartz VS XQuartz

:10 AM, David Evans <dev...@macports.org> wrote: > On 4/4/16 1:21 AM, Andrea Giammarchi wrote: > > Some sort of followup from mozjs24 thread, strictly related to WebKit2 > GTK3. > > > > The default, XQuartz based version, seems to have some issue with SSL / >

Re: WebKit2-GTK: quartz VS XQuartz

PM, Brandon Allbery <allber...@gmail.com> wrote: > On Mon, Apr 4, 2016 at 4:21 AM, Andrea Giammarchi < > andrea.giammar...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> wouldn't be better if MacPorts GTK3 was using by default quartz > > > Wouldn't it be better if gtk3 actually worked cor

WebKit2-GTK: quartz VS XQuartz

Some sort of followup from mozjs24 thread, strictly related to WebKit2 GTK3. The default, XQuartz based version, seems to have some issue with SSL / HTTPS sites. If you use this file as example: https://github.com/WebReflection/jsgtk/blob/master/examples/browser.gjs you'll notice a `broken

Re: About mozjs24 being built

On Sun, Apr 3, 2016 at 3:53 PM, Brandon Allbery <allber...@gmail.com> wrote: > On Sun, Apr 3, 2016 at 10:49 AM, Andrea Giammarchi < > andrea.giammar...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> I've also noticed, after successfully installing `gjs`, that it doesn't >>

Re: About mozjs24 being built

to test gjs via macports? Am I missing something? Thanks! On Sun, Apr 3, 2016 at 3:05 PM, Clemens Lang <c...@macports.org> wrote: > Hi, > > On Sun, Apr 03, 2016 at 02:24:28PM +0100, Andrea Giammarchi wrote: > > Installing `gjs` brings in a lot of modules

About mozjs24 being built

Hi everyone! Installing `gjs` brings in a lot of modules and `mozjs24` is one of these. There are pre-built binaries via homebrew and `mozjs24` has been around for very long time so it surprises me it needs to be built via macports. It's also actually the only one that needs this step,