Re: Default linker changed when installing GCC 5.3.0 on Tiger

2016-04-26 Thread César
El miércoles, 27 de abril de 2016, Ryan Schmidt <ryandes...@macports.org> escribió: > > On Apr 26, 2016, at 5:11 PM, César wrote: > > > El martes, 26 de abril de 2016, Ryan Schmidt escribió: > > > >> On Apr 26, 2016, at 4:31 PM, César wrote: > >>

Re: Default linker changed when installing GCC 5.3.0 on Tiger

2016-04-26 Thread César
El martes, 26 de abril de 2016, Ryan Schmidt <ryandes...@macports.org> escribió: > > On Apr 26, 2016, at 4:31 PM, César wrote: > > > After installing GCC 5.3.0 in Tiger, I realized that if I invoke ld from > the command line, I'm actually invoking /opt/local/bin/ld. I real

Default linker changed when installing GCC 5.3.0 on Tiger

2016-04-26 Thread César
/opt/local/bin/ld. Is there any way I can select /usr/bin/ld as the default linker when I'm not using GCC 5.3.0? Thanks! César ___ macports-users mailing list macports-users@lists.macosforge.org https://lists.macosforge.org/mailman/listinfo/macports

Anybody with 10.6.8 and Macports-built GCC 5.3.0 willing to upload its binaries?

2016-04-20 Thread César
on hard deadlines at the moment and it would be of great help. Thanks a lot in advance César ___ macports-users mailing list macports-users@lists.macosforge.org https://lists.macosforge.org/mailman/listinfo/macports-users

Re: Is any clang version known to work in PPC/Tiger?

2016-04-05 Thread César
On 3 April 2016, Mojca Miklavec <mo...@macports.org> wrote: > On 3 April 2016 at 22:13, César wrote: > > I've read that clang/llvm have been improving their PPC support over the > > years. But, is any version known to build? > > [...] > > See also: > http

Re: Is any clang version known to work in PPC/Tiger?

2016-04-05 Thread César
On Apr5, 2016, Ryan Schmidt <ryandes...@macports.org> wrote: > > On Apr 3, 2016, at 5:44 PM, César wrote: > > > Can't executables be built statically without such requirement? > > Unless you're talking about a static library you created for use only in > your progr

Re: Is any clang version known to work in PPC/Tiger?

2016-04-03 Thread César
On 3 de April 2016, Mojca Miklavec <mo...@macports.org> wrote: > On 3 April 2016 at 22:13, César wrote: > > I've read that clang/llvm have been improving their PPC support over the > > years. But, is any version known to build? > > I have clang-3.4 installed on 10.5

Is any clang version known to work in PPC/Tiger?

2016-04-03 Thread César
I've read that clang/llvm have been improving their PPC support over the years. But, is any version known to build? And, can it be used in production, or there's the risk of getting corrupted/nonworking binaries? Thanks! César ___ macports-users