Re: Xcode 4.6 update in Mac App Store - safe for macports, or better to wait?

2013-01-29 Thread Ryan Schmidt
On Jan 29, 2013, at 01:47, Richard L. Hamilton wrote: > Xcode 4.6 is in the App Store. Should it work ok with macports, or is it > best to wait...for what first? I updated to Xcode 4.6 on Mountain Lion earlier today, but the command line tools update, which is much more significant for MacPor

Xcode 4.6 update in Mac App Store - safe for macports, or better to wait?

2013-01-28 Thread Richard L. Hamilton
Xcode 4.6 is in the App Store. Should it work ok with macports, or is it best to wait...for what first? ___ macports-users mailing list macports-users@lists.macosforge.org https://lists.macosforge.org/mailman/listinfo/macports-users

Re: Mac App Store

2010-10-31 Thread Ryan Schmidt
On Oct 31, 2010, at 05:49, David Nicholls wrote: > On 31/10/10 12:38 PM, Ryan Schmidt wrote: >> >> On Oct 30, 2010, at 20:26, David Nicholls wrote: >> >>> Now, when I run either version it crashes, every time, with the >>> ignore/relaunch/report window. Any suggestions? >> >> Is your pallet up

Re: Mac App Store

2010-10-30 Thread David Nicholls
On 31/10/10 1:50 AM, Ryan Schmidt wrote: We already have a neat application for running Macports in a more user-friendly way; it's called Pallet. See: http://trac.macports.org/wiki/MacPortsGUI Anyway you seem to be asking about whether MacPorts itself could appear in the App Store, while thi

Re: Mac App Store

2010-10-30 Thread Ryan Schmidt
On Oct 30, 2010, at 08:16, Haravikk wrote: > While there are certainly plenty of clauses that could allow Apple to deny > Macports access to their app store, I think it's still something worth > attempting, as a nice Mac app for running macports would certainly be more > user friendly anyway, s

Re: Mac App Store

2010-10-30 Thread Haravikk
While there are certainly plenty of clauses that could allow Apple to deny Macports access to their app store, I think it's still something worth attempting, as a nice Mac app for running macports would certainly be more user friendly anyway, so even if Apple did then reject it it's not like it'

Re: Mac App Store

2010-10-30 Thread Rainer Müller
On 2010-10-30 08:24 , Martin Krischik wrote: > Have you not read the rules? There are some many rules which end with > »may/will be rejected«. I don't think we can - without checking I think > we MacPorts in violation in 2 or 3 of those: > > 1) Downloading additional components. > 2) Using non pre

Re: Mac App Store

2010-10-30 Thread Erwan David
Le Fri 29/10/2010, Anthony Michael Agelastos disait > Hello, > > Out of curiosity, are there any plans for MacPorts to be on the upcoming Mac > App Store? If not, does anyone think there's merit for MacPorts to utilize > such infrastructure? I am not sure how the store wi

Re: Mac App Store

2010-10-29 Thread Martin Krischik
Am 30.10.10 04:47, schrieb Anthony Michael Agelastos: > Out of curiosity, are there any plans for MacPorts to be on the > upcoming Mac App Store? Have you not read the rules? There are some many rules which end with »may/will be rejected«. I don't think we can - without checking

Re: Mac App Store

2010-10-29 Thread Ryan Schmidt
On Oct 29, 2010, at 21:47, Anthony Michael Agelastos wrote: > Out of curiosity, are there any plans for MacPorts to be on the upcoming Mac > App Store? If not, does anyone think there's merit for MacPorts to utilize > such infrastructure? I am not sure how the store will wor

Mac App Store

2010-10-29 Thread Anthony Michael Agelastos
Hello, Out of curiosity, are there any plans for MacPorts to be on the upcoming Mac App Store? If not, does anyone think there's merit for MacPorts to utilize such infrastructure? I am not sure how the store will work, but I would assume that it would give MacPorts the ability to in