Re: XCode 3.0? Safe for old school Tiger users?

2007-10-30 Thread David Corking
On 10/29/07, Instruct ICC wrote: I posted a bug report about Xcode Find (in a file versus in a project) and the developers said it should be fixed in Xcode 3.0. I think you will find the IDE portion of Xcode is closed source. If the bug is in the IDE, and Apple don't backport it themselves,

Re: XCode 3.0? Safe for old school Tiger users?

2007-10-30 Thread Anders F Björklund
David Corking wrote: I posted a bug report about Xcode Find (in a file versus in a project) and the developers said it should be fixed in Xcode 3.0. I think you will find the IDE portion of Xcode is closed source. If the bug is in the IDE, and Apple don't backport it themselves, you are out

off topic? Re: XCode 3.0? Safe for old school Tiger users?

2007-10-30 Thread David Corking
On 10/30/07, Anders F Björklund wrote: Xcode 2.5 will soon be available, as the end-of-the-road for Tiger... But it probably doesn't have all the features and fixes of Xcode 3.0. Good news. Only the command line GNU tools in Xcode are open source, such as gcc itself. Not all tools are

Re: off topic? Re: XCode 3.0? Safe for old school Tiger users?

2007-10-30 Thread David Corking
Anders F Björklund wrote: Objective-C++ eventually got included, so Objective-C 2.0 probably will. Someone needs to write a new runtime, though, such as the GNUstep one ? I think everything will be in Apple's public CVS - but in this mail, Apple point to deeper dependencies on Leopard.:

Re: XCode 3.0? Safe for old school Tiger users?

2007-10-29 Thread Ryan Schmidt
On Oct 27, 2007, at 17:12, David Corking wrote: On 10/27/07, Adam Mercer wrote: I see it's out, and I have downloaded it. But is there any benefit to installing it or any risk of screwing things up if I do? Xcode 3 will only work on Leopard, from the release notes: Does it come with a

RE: XCode 3.0? Safe for old school Tiger users?

2007-10-29 Thread Instruct ICC
I'm sure the MacPorts project would not be interested in supporting a tweaked version of Xcode. Why not? I'm thinking tweaked for Tiger, but maybe someone else will say tweaked for OS 9. Quite. MacPorts already has 8 versions of gcc - there is no room for any more. I have no personal

Re: XCode 3.0? Safe for old school Tiger users?

2007-10-29 Thread Ryan Schmidt
On Oct 29, 2007, at 16:55, Instruct ICC wrote: I'm sure the MacPorts project would not be interested in supporting a tweaked version of Xcode. Why not? We have enough trouble keeping this working with the current set of Apple-supported tools. I for one have zero interested in trying

Re: XCode 3.0? Safe for old school Tiger users?

2007-10-27 Thread Adam Mercer
On 27/10/2007, paul beard [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I see it's out, and I have downloaded it. But is there any benefit to installing it or any risk of screwing things up if I do? Xcode 3 will only work on Leopard, from the release notes: Supported configurations Xcode 3.0 will run on Mac OS

Re: XCode 3.0? Safe for old school Tiger users?

2007-10-27 Thread David Corking
On 10/27/07, Adam Mercer wrote: I see it's out, and I have downloaded it. But is there any benefit to installing it or any risk of screwing things up if I do? Xcode 3 will only work on Leopard, from the release notes: Does it come with a gcc tarball - including the new objective-c