/ Craig Treleaven wrote on Wed 7.Nov'12 at 9:37:41 -0400 /
At 2:11 PM + 11/7/12, Federico Calboli wrote:
On 7 Nov 2012, at 14:06, Jeremy Lavergne jer...@lavergne.gotdns.org wrote:
Which packages if I can ask? because they might be packages
that I do not want nor need.
I grepped
On Nov 08, 2012, at 01:29 PM, "William H. Magill" mag...@icloud.com wrote:On Nov 07, 2012, at 08:47 AM, Federico Calboli f.calb...@gmail.com wrote:After having a go with homebrew I decided that macport's use of /opt/local is significantly less likely to screw up my system, so I am now quite firmly
On 8 Nov 2012, at 18:29, William H. Magill mag...@icloud.com wrote:
On Nov 07, 2012, at 08:47 AM, Federico Calboli f.calb...@gmail.com wrote:
After having a go with homebrew I decided that macport's use of /opt/local
is significantly less likely to screw up my system, so I am now quite
On Nov 8, 2012, at 02:12, Jamie Paul Griffin wrote:
I haven't looked for ages but is the OpenDarwin project still going? I had
thoughts once upon-a-time that this project might get going well enough to
provide an entire Open Source platform that macports would be a great
candidate for
After having a go with homebrew I decided that macport's use of /opt/local is
significantly less likely to screw up my system, so I am now quite firmly on
the macport side of the camp. One good thing homebrew has though is the fact
it only requires the command line tools, not the whole
On 7 Nov 2012, at 13:49, Jeremy Lavergne jer...@lavergne.gotdns.org wrote:
After having a go with homebrew I decided that macport's use of /opt/local
is significantly less likely to screw up my system, so I am now quite firmly
on the macport side of the camp. One good thing homebrew has
Which packages if I can ask? because they might be packages that I do not
want nor need.
I grepped to find 148 packages using our xcode includes explicitly
(xcode.*1\.0). There may be more that were manually built without using our
PortGroup files.
How so? I would have imagined it's the
On 7 Nov 2012, at 14:06, Jeremy Lavergne jer...@lavergne.gotdns.org wrote:
Which packages if I can ask? because they might be packages that I do not
want nor need.
I grepped to find 148 packages using our xcode includes explicitly
(xcode.*1\.0). There may be more that were manually
At 2:11 PM + 11/7/12, Federico Calboli wrote:
On 7 Nov 2012, at 14:06, Jeremy Lavergne jer...@lavergne.gotdns.org wrote:
Which packages if I can ask? because they might be packages that
I do not want nor need.
I grepped to find 148 packages using our xcode includes explicitly
On 11/7/12 3:06 PM, Jeremy Lavergne wrote:
I grepped to find 148 packages using our xcode includes explicitly
(xcode.*1\.0). There may be more that were manually built without using our
PortGroup files.
please print the list
___
macports-users
(base)newmbp:ports mateo$ (grep -lR 'PortGroup.*xcode.*1\.0' .|xargs -n 1
dirname )|tee /dev/tty|wc
./_resources/port1.0/group
./aqua/AppHack
./aqua/AppKiDo
./aqua/AquaLess
./aqua/aquaterm
./aqua/ArpSpyX
./aqua/arrsync
./aqua/AssignmentTrackerX
./aqua/BGHUDAppKit
./aqua/BiggerSQL
11 matches
Mail list logo
