On Mar 11, 2014, at 15:44, Nicolas Pavillon wrote:
> Several PIM applications of KDE rely on the akonadi server which must be
> running, but I am not sure about KMail. You can refer to “port notes akonadi”
> about this.
I've run through all kcmshell4 modules, adjusting things here and there
On Mar 11, 2014, at 15:44, Nicolas Pavillon wrote:
> Hello,
>
>> I've been making some progress, using gcc-4.2 and tweaking Portfiles where
>> required. Lots of apps appear to be nicely functional, even, including Kate
>> and Konsole. (I had an issue with KWrite, but since I hardly ever used
Hello,
> I've been making some progress, using gcc-4.2 and tweaking Portfiles where
> required. Lots of apps appear to be nicely functional, even, including Kate
> and Konsole. (I had an issue with KWrite, but since I hardly ever used it I
> dropped it). I should say that I built Kate, Konsole
I've been making some progress, using gcc-4.2 and tweaking Portfiles where
required. Lots of apps appear to be nicely functional, even, including Kate and
Konsole. (I had an issue with KWrite, but since I hardly ever used it I dropped
it). I should say that I built Kate, Konsole and a number of
On 04/03/2014, at 12:35 PM, James Linder wrote:
> On 4 Mar 2014, at 4:00 am, macports-users-requ...@lists.macosforge.org wrote:
>> It is trivial to make Linux boot on a Mac - I have a number of Mac Pros
>> booting into Ubuntu at work. Either single, double or triple (or more) boot.
>> Same hard d
On 4 Mar 2014, at 4:00 am, macports-users-requ...@lists.macosforge.org wrote:
>> I think that is pretty much out of the question, unless you run a virtual
>> machine. I am not sure where Linux is up to with dual-booting on Mac.
>> When I last looked, about two years ago, it was possible with Win
On 03/03/2014, at 10:22 PM, René J.V. Bertin wrote:
> On Monday March 03 2014 13:25:20 Ian Wadham wrote:
>
>> Yes, but I don't know what they all are. I have tried to find out … :-(
>> They
>> are portable, in a language and library sense, but not in a design sense.
>> KDE/Linux is one desktop/
On Monday March 03 2014 13:25:20 Ian Wadham wrote:
> Yes, but I don't know what they all are. I have tried to find out … :-( They
> are portable, in a language and library sense, but not in a design sense.
> KDE/Linux is one desktop/OS and OS X is another. It's a difference in
> infrastructure.
On 03/03/2014, at 1:19 PM, Frank Schima wrote:
> On Mar 2, 2014, at 3:02 PM, Ian Wadham wrote:
>> I think that is pretty much out of the question, unless you run a virtual
>> machine. I am not sure where Linux is up to with dual-booting on Mac.
>> When I last looked, about two years ago, it was p
On 03/03/2014, at 11:34 AM, René J.V. Bertin wrote:
> On Mar 02, 2014, at 23:02, Ian Wadham wrote:
>> A lot of the portability of the libraries stems from the underlying Qt 4
>> library (see 'port info qt4-mac'), which is a very good fit on OS X and
>
> That's what I'd hope, indeed! Pity that the
On Mar 2, 2014, at 3:02 PM, Ian Wadham wrote:
> I think that is pretty much out of the question, unless you run a virtual
> machine. I am not sure where Linux is up to with dual-booting on Mac.
> When I last looked, about two years ago, it was possible with Windows
> (using Apple's Boot Camp) b
On Mar 02, 2014, at 23:02, Ian Wadham wrote:
> A lot of the portability of the libraries stems from the underlying Qt 4
> library (see 'port info qt4-mac'), which is a very good fit on OS X and
That's what I'd hope, indeed! Pity that the same portability hasn't been
assured in the non-graphics d
On 03/03/2014, at 2:31 AM, René J.V. Bertin wrote:
> BTW, how complete is support for KDE4 on OS X? Is it more a proof of concept,
Support from the KDE group for KDE 4 on OS X? Almost non-existent:
I think very few of them have Macs … :-) If you can nail down a problem
in a KDE library or build,
Hello,
On Mar 02, 2014, at 11:02, Nicolas Pavillon wrote:
> I came up similar errors in some cases (but not this particular one), where
> symbols are not recognised for some weird reason. A workaround can be to
> statically link these symbols by including the object file directly in the
> execu
Hello,
Kde4-baseapps should build fine in standard configuration, also in the case of
Snow Leopard. However, your build log is partial, so that it is not easy to be
precise. One thing is that you are not using the standard compiler (gcc-mp-4.7)
so that you may encounter other errors, but I don
I'd be interested to run certain KDE apps on my MBP, so I'm trying to install
KDE. Apart from some doubts as to whether the services which I'm told to launch
via launchctl will actually work (I'm used to seeing errors concerning dbus not
being available) the install has gone without hickups unti
16 matches
Mail list logo
