On 2009-04-04 02:49, Ryan Schmidt wrote:
Do we really feel this is an appropriate use of a milestone?
That's exactly what #14909 is about :-)
I was on
the fence about it so I didn't say anything, hoping someone else
would chime in. It seems to me that any software issues like mpab and
On Sat, Apr 04, 2009 at 09:19:50AM +0200, Rainer Müller said:
On 2009-04-04 02:49, Ryan Schmidt wrote:
[...]
I was on
the fence about it so I didn't say anything, hoping someone else
would chime in. It seems to me that any software issues like mpab and
any base modifications would go
Bryan Blackburn wrote:
On Sat, Apr 04, 2009 at 09:19:50AM +0200, Rainer Müller said:
On 2009-04-04 02:49, Ryan Schmidt wrote:
[...]
I was on
the fence about it so I didn't say anything, hoping someone else
would chime in. It seems to me that any software issues like mpab and
any base
On Apr 2, 2009, at 18:30, Rainer Müller wrote:
On 2009-03-30 22:07, Darren Weber wrote:
How about a new milestone for trac: binary distributions? I guess
most
of this would focus on mpab and adaptations to port to enable binary
installations.
Nobody objected, so I created the new
On 2009-03-30 22:07, Darren Weber wrote:
How about a new milestone for trac: binary distributions? I guess most
of this would focus on mpab and adaptations to port to enable binary
installations.
Nobody objected, so I created the new milestone.
Rainer
PS:
Should really look into getting
How about a new milestone for trac: binary distributions? I guess most of
this would focus on mpab and adaptations to port to enable binary
installations.
Take care, Darren
___
macports-users mailing list
macports-users@lists.macosforge.org
