unpleasant surprises: no ports are installed

2008-02-19 Thread paul beard
Something has come undone in my efforts to get the MAMP stack re-installed. [/opt/local/var/macports/receipts]# port installed | more Error: port installed failed: Registry error: php5 @ 5.2.5_1+apache2+darwin_8+macosx+mysql5 not registered as installed. No ports are installed. This looks worse

Re: {Disarmed} unpleasant surprises: no ports are installed

2008-02-19 Thread paul beard
On Feb 19, 2008 9:32 AM, Jay Chandler [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: The FreeBSD ports tree has a tool to address such things-- pkgdb -F tends to sort 'em out quickly. Is there a MacPorts equivalent to this? yes, i have used that many times. it might be a worthwhile RFE for the next release of

Re: ImageMagick checksun error

2008-02-19 Thread Jay Chandler
William Davis wrote: On Feb 19, 2008, at 10:29 AM, Peter O'Gorman wrote: I just downloaded ImageMagick-6.3.8-9 from ftp.imagemagick.org http://ftp.imagemagick.org and get these sums: MD5 edf2bd8e8ebd0fae567bf2bc7f232bbe SHA1 5fce4c7b70fa2348f536f01178bd9372bbf5af91 RIPEMD160

building pidgin with silc functionality

2008-02-19 Thread Artie Ziff
Hi, Does there exist a means to affect configure type changes (like asking pidgin to build with silc libs) from the port command line? Or is the only way to do this is edit the Port file directly? Cheers, AZ ___ macports-users mailing list

Re: ImageMagick checksun error

2008-02-19 Thread Ryan Schmidt
On Feb 18, 2008, at 20:23, William Davis wrote: --- Verifying checksum(s) for ImageMagick DEBUG: Executing org.macports.checksum (ImageMagick) --- Checksumming ImageMagick-6.3.8-9.tar.bz2 Error: Checksum (md5) mismatch for ImageMagick-6.3.8-9.tar.bz2 Portfile checksum:

Re: building pidgin with silc functionality

2008-02-19 Thread Ryan Schmidt
On Feb 19, 2008, at 15:58, Artie Ziff wrote: Does there exist a means to affect configure type changes (like asking pidgin to build with silc libs) from the port command line? Or is the only way to do this is edit the Port file directly? File an enhancement request with the port maintainer

Re: nedit: cannot open files under Leopard

2008-02-19 Thread Ryan Schmidt
On Feb 18, 2008, at 17:55, Hummingbird wrote: Although I read many complaints about nedit on OSX on the web I still thought I'll give it a try since I love this little editor so much I compiled nedit under Leopard but I get the following problem: Whenever I open a file through the

Port looks for make in /usr/bin now?

2008-02-19 Thread [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Hey guys, thanks for any help! I'm running Leopard 10.5.2 and the latest installation of macports. I did a fresh install of leopard and used Migration Assistant to copy over my user. So besides config files in my user folder everything is basically like a clean install. Today I tried to update

Re: Port looks for make in /usr/bin now?

2008-02-19 Thread Adam Mercer
On Feb 19, 2008 10:43 PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hey guys, thanks for any help! I'm running Leopard 10.5.2 and the latest installation of macports. I did a fresh install of leopard and used Migration Assistant to copy over my user. So besides config files in my user folder

Re: Port looks for make in /usr/bin now?

2008-02-19 Thread [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Argh. That did it. Thanks Adam! RC Adam Mercer wrote: On Feb 19, 2008 10:43 PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hey guys, thanks for any help! I'm running Leopard 10.5.2 and the latest installation of macports. I did a fresh install of leopard and used Migration Assistant to copy

emacs-app dependencies

2008-02-19 Thread Garth Corral
Okay, I must be missing something. Since the carbon emacs port is seemingly broken on leopard, I decided to check out emacs-app. While this does build on leopard, I was somewhat dismayed to see the dependencies in the Portfile. It's not a huge issue but the one thing that concerned me