-Original Message-
From: Brandon Allbery
Date: 2 February 2016 at 16:06:18
> On Tue, Feb 2, 2016 at 9:57 AM, Harald Hanche-Olsen
> wrote:
>
> > Well, you did not say in the bug report that you were using sudo, so no
> > wonder it got closed.
>
> ? sudo is the
Well, you did not say in the bug report that you were using sudo, so no wonder
it got closed.
My own systems are too heavily modified at the moment for me to be sure, but I
have a file /etc/paths.d/45-macports containing the two lines
/opt/local/bin
/opt/local/sbin
These should be enough to
On Tue, Feb 2, 2016 at 10:22 AM, Harald Hanche-Olsen
wrote:
> Okay, now I am curious. How does the macports installation manipulate the
> path? As far as I know, the above method is standard, even though it may
> not be what macports does. (If I installed that file there, I
-Original Message-
From: Harald Hanche-Olsen
Date: 2 February 2016 at 15:57:39
> […] You can check by running “sudo printenv PATH”. […]
Uh, sorry, I missed the fact that you did show the result of running that, and
that /opt/local/bin is missing from the output.
On Tue, Feb 2, 2016 at 7:22 AM, Harald Hanche-Olsen
wrote:
> -Original Message-
> From: Brandon Allbery
> Date: 2 February 2016 at 16:06:18
>
> > On Tue, Feb 2, 2016 at 9:57 AM, Harald Hanche-Olsen
> > wrote:
> >
> > > Well, you did not say in
On Tue, Feb 2, 2016 at 9:57 AM, Harald Hanche-Olsen
wrote:
> Well, you did not say in the bug report that you were using sudo, so no
> wonder it got closed.
>
? sudo is the recommended way to do this.
> My own systems are too heavily modified at the moment for me to be
-Original Message-
From: Phil Oertel
Date: 2 February 2016 at 16:31:12
> Entirely possible. I didn't make any such modification personally, but it's
> a work laptop, so I don't know what they've done to the image prior to
> giving it to me. Maybe I'll get them to
On Tue, Feb 2, 2016 at 10:33 AM, Harald Hanche-Olsen
wrote:
> An alternative would have been to modify /etc/paths instead? Or is that
> too global, or something?
Same problem, IIRC.
--
brandon s allbery kf8nh sine nomine associates
-Original Message-
From: Phil Oertel
Date: 2 February 2016 at 17:13:59
> Yes, it has both env_reset and a secure_path. And some comments at the top
> indicating that the file is periodically overwritten by Puppet.
Ah, then we have a definite diagnosis! Good. Then
-Original Message-
From: Brandon Allbery
Date: 2 February 2016 at 16:28:50
> The problem with paths.d is that it adds path entries *after* the standard
> ones, whereas users tend to expect that e.g. /opt/local/bin/python
> "overrides" Apple's /usr/bin/python. So
On Tue, Feb 2, 2016 at 7:40 AM, Harald Hanche-Olsen
wrote:
> -Original Message-
> From: Phil Oertel
> Date: 2 February 2016 at 16:31:12
>
> > Entirely possible. I didn't make any such modification personally, but
> it's
> > a work laptop, so I
On Tue, Feb 2, 2016 at 12:35 AM, Ryan Schmidt
wrote:
> I see a CoreSimulator crash in that log. See
> https://trac.macports.org/wiki/ProblemHotlist#xcode7.2
>
You are right. Thank you Ryan. Already fixed.
--
Eneko Gotzon Ares
enekogot...@gmail.com
> Am 02.02.2016 um 06:33 schrieb Phil Oertel :
>
> I'm unable to sudo run any port commands after installing macports (version
> 2.3.4, system is El Capitan 10.11.3). I installed via the package installer.
> After running the installer and opening a new shell, my login
13 matches
Mail list logo