Re: Error installing xorg-server

2012-05-23 Thread thedaniel

Okay, here is the tail end of the log file. Hope it helps:

:info:build Command failed:  cd /opt/local/var/macports/build/ 
_opt_local_var_macports_sources_rsync.macports.org_release_ports_x11_xor 
g-server/xorg-server/work/xorg-server-1.12.1.901  /usr/bin/make - 
j2 -w all V=1

:info:build Exit code: 2
:error:build org.macports.build for port xorg-server returned:  
command execution failed

:debug:build Error code: CHILDSTATUS 7297 2
:debug:build Backtrace: command execution failed
while executing
system -nice 0 $fullcmdstring
(eval body line 1)
invoked from within
eval system $notty $nice \$fullcmdstring
invoked from within
command_exec build
(procedure portbuild::build_main line 8)
invoked from within
$procedure $targetname
:info:build Warning: targets not executed for xorg-server:  
org.macports.activate org.macports.build org.macports.destroot  
org.macports.install

:notice:build Please see the log file for port xorg-server for details:
/opt/local/var/macports/logs/ 
_opt_local_var_macports_sources_rsync.macports.org_release_ports_x11_xor 
g-server/xorg-server/main.log


main.log is 5.8MB - too big for me to email. If you want the whole  
log file, I can post it online for you to download. LMK


Thanks for your help,
-Daniel

On 22/05/2012, at 2:58 PM, Ryan Schmidt wrote:



On May 22, 2012, at 09:18, thedan...@nifty-neat.com wrote:



On 21/05/2012, at 10:19 PM, Ryan Schmidt wrote:



On May 21, 2012, at 20:06, theDaniel wrote:


Hi Folks,

New Macports user Question:

An error is given when I try to install xorg-server 1.8.1_1:

DEBUG: Searching for dependency: p5.12-locale-gettext
DEBUG: Didn't find receipt, going to depspec regex for: p5.12- 
locale-gettext

Error: Dependency 'p5.12-locale-gettext' not found.
To report a bug, follow the instructions in the guide:
   http://guide.macports.org/#project.tickets
Error: Processing of port xorg-server failed



Run sudo port selfupdate to resync your ports and rebuild the  
port index. The port p5.12-locale-gettext definitely exists, and  
has for a long time.




I did as you suggested, but I had to run sudo port selfupdate  
twice, to get rid that error. Now I get Error: Processing of port  
xorg-server failed.


I also tried installing quartz-wm. It also failed to install with  
the same: Error: Processing of port quartz-wm failed. Is this  
error related to Xcode? I have the latest I know of for Tiger.


This should have nothing to do with the version of Xcode or the  
version of OS X. And you're right, Xcode 2.5 is the latest for  
Tiger. It should work fine; I run that on two machines for testing  
purposes.


Could you run port version just to verify that you are really  
running MacPorts 2.1.1?


And can you run your port installs with the debug switch and see if  
it shows any more information?


sudo port -d install xorg-server





___
macports-users mailing list
macports-users@lists.macosforge.org
http://lists.macosforge.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/macports-users


Re: mysql55 up and running on production

2012-05-23 Thread Bjarne D Mathiesen
Some recent changes that pixilla made to the port file breaks a normal
install :
https://trac.macports.org/ticket/34552
https://trac.macports.org/changeset/93312

To make it work, you have two options :

1) If this is a new install :
port install mysql55 +system_readline

2) If you've already installed mysql55:
port clean --work mysql55
port -n upgrade --force --enforce-variants mysql55
 +system_readline

-- 
Bjarne D Mathiesen
København N ; Danmark ; Europa
--
denne besked er skrevet i et totalt M$-frit miljø
MacOS X 10.7.3 Lion ; 2.8GHz Intel Core i7 ; 16GB 1067MHz DDR3
___
macports-users mailing list
macports-users@lists.macosforge.org
http://lists.macosforge.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/macports-users


Re: mysql55 up and running on production

2012-05-23 Thread Watch Dog
On Wed, May 23, 2012 at 7:35 AM, Bjarne D Mathiesen
macint...@mathiesen.info wrote:
 Some recent changes that pixilla made to the port file breaks a normal
 install :
 https://trac.macports.org/ticket/34552
 https://trac.macports.org/changeset/93312

Ah, yes, pixilla.  Commit w/o testing, again.  Maybe time to
reconsider commit privileges?

-WD
___
macports-users mailing list
macports-users@lists.macosforge.org
http://lists.macosforge.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/macports-users


confusion

2012-05-23 Thread Emden R. Gansner
I appear to have gotten my tree into a strange state. I did a port selfupdate, and then started 
doing port upgrade. I am now coming across the following. What is the best

way to get the tree back into a coherent state? Thanks.

Emden



s) sudo port upgrade autoconf
---  Scanning binaries for linking errors: 100.0%
---  Found 69 broken file(s), matching files to ports
---  Found 2 broken port(s), determining rebuild order
---  Rebuilding in order
 gtk2 @2.24.10 +universal+x11
 libglade2 @2.6.4 +universal
---  Computing dependencies for gtk2
---  Dependencies to be installed: pango
---  Configuring pango
Error: To install pango without the quartz variant, cairo must be installed 
without the quartz variant.
Error: org.macports.configure for port pango returned: incompatible cairo 
installation
Error: Failed to install pango
Please see the log file for port pango for details:

/opt/local/var/macports/logs/_opt_local_var_macports_sources_rsync.macports.org_release_tarballs_ports_x11_pango/pango/main.log

Error: The following dependencies were not installed: pango
---  Computing dependencies for libglade2
---  Cleaning libglade2
---  Scanning binaries for linking errors: 100.0%
---  Found 69 broken file(s), matching files to ports
---  Found 2 broken port(s), determining rebuild order
---  Rebuilding in order
 gtk2 @2.24.10 +universal+x11
 libglade2 @2.6.4 +universal
---  Computing dependencies for gtk2
---  Dependencies to be installed: pango
---  Configuring pango
Error: To install pango without the quartz variant, cairo must be installed 
without the quartz variant.
Error: org.macports.configure for port pango returned: incompatible cairo 
installation
Error: Failed to install pango
Please see the log file for port pango for details:

/opt/local/var/macports/logs/_opt_local_var_macports_sources_rsync.macports.org_release_tarballs_ports_x11_pango/pango/main.log

Error: The following dependencies were not installed: pango
Error: Unable to upgrade port: 1
Error rebuilding gtk2
while executing
error Error rebuilding $portname
(procedure revupgrade_scanandrebuild line 370)
invoked from within
revupgrade_scanandrebuild broken_port_counts $opts
(procedure macports::revupgrade line 5)
invoked from within
macports::revupgrade $opts
(procedure action_revupgrade line 2)
invoked from within
action_revupgrade $action $portlist $opts
(procedure action_upgrade line 24)
invoked from within
$action_proc $action $portlist [array get global_options]
(procedure process_cmd line 95)
invoked from within
process_cmd $remaining_args
invoked from within
if { [llength $remaining_args]  0 } {

# If there are remaining arguments, process those as a command
set exit_status [process_cmd $remaining...
(file /opt/local/bin/port line 4784)
s)
___
macports-users mailing list
macports-users@lists.macosforge.org
http://lists.macosforge.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/macports-users


Re: apache2 httpd 2.4.2

2012-05-23 Thread Bjarne D Mathiesen
Bjarne D Mathiesen wrote:
 OK - I'm trying to update the apache2 portfile from 2.2.22 to 2.4.2

pixilla  I have been working on this for some time now.

The state is presently as follows:

apache2 @2.4.2  www/apache2
php5 @5.3.13_0+apache2+pear+suhosin (active)
php5-mysql  @5.3.13 php/php5-mysql
- works on test server for the last month
- works on production server for the last month

mod_antispam@1.0www/mod_antispam
- seems to be abandoned by creator
- doesn't install
- serious work needs to be done
- no response from maintainer
- anybody using this ... then yell _loudly_

mod_authn_otp   @1.1.1  www/mod_authn_otp
- no problems detected when installing
- no response from maintainer

mod_cband   @0.9.7.5www/mod_cband
- works with simple search/replace pathc
- no response from maintainer

mod_chroot  @0.5www/mod_chroot
- no problems detected when installing
- no response from maintainer

mod_dnssd   @0.6www/mod_dnssd
- no problems detected when installing
- no response from maintainer

mod_dosevasive  @1.8www/mod_dosevasive
- replaced by mod_evasive

mod_evasive @1.10.1 www/mod_evasive
- works with simple search/replace pathc
- no response from maintainer
- works on my production server

mod_fastcgi @2.4.6  www/mod_fastcgi
- doesn't install
- should be replaced by mod_fcgid
- anybody using this ... then yell _loudly_

mod_fcgid   @2.3.7  www/mod_fcgid
- no problems detected when installing

mod_gnutls  @0.5.10 www/mod_gnutls
- works with simple search/replace pathc
- no response from maintainer

mod_jk  @1.2.27 www/mod_jk
mod_jk2 @5.5.4  www/mod_jk2
- not relevant for apache httpd 2.4.2
- ought to retired completely

mod_mono@2.10   www/mod_mono
- works with simple search/replace pathc
- no maintainer at present

mod_perl@1.30   www/mod_perl
- not relevant for apache httpd 2.4.2
- ought to retired completely

mod_perl2   @2.0.6  www/mod_perl2
- works with patches made by pixilla
- works with perl5.14

mod_proxy_html  @3.0.1  www/mod_proxy_html
- not relevant for apache httpd 2.4.2
- module already included by apache
- ought to retired completely

mod_python  @3.3.1  www/mod_python
mod_python25@3.3.1  www/mod_python25
mod_python26@3.3.1  www/mod_python26
mod_wsgi@3.3www/mod_wsgi
mod_ruby@1.3.0  www/mod_ruby
- no work has been done on these
- maintainers haven't responded
- ought to be considered abandoned by maintainers
- anybody using these ... then yell _loudly_ !!!

mod_security@1.8.6  www/mod_security
- ought to replaced by mod_security2

mod_security2   @2.6.5  www/mod_security2
- no problems detected when installing
- works on my production server

mod_ssi_func@1.0www/mod_ssi_func
- not relevant for apache httpd 2.4.2
- ought to retired completely

++

So ... where do we go from here ???
We've got patches etc for the above and I've got it running completely
without any problems on both my test system as well as in production.

Ryan is of the opnion that we transition _hard_ from 2.2.x to 2.4.x and
don't look back at all.

Are there any outstanding stuff / ports that will have problems with the
transition from 2.2.x to 2.4.2 before we do so ???

:-)
-- 
Bjarne D Mathiesen
København N ; Danmark ; Europa
--
denne besked er skrevet i et totalt M$-frit miljø
MacOS X 10.7.3 Lion ; 2.8GHz Intel Core i7 ; 16GB 1067MHz DDR3
___
macports-users mailing list
macports-users@lists.macosforge.org
http://lists.macosforge.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/macports-users


Re: confusion

2012-05-23 Thread Jeremy Lavergne
I'd recommend cleaning deactivate and trying again:
 sudo port clean cairo pango
 sudo port -f deactivate cairo pango
 sudo port install cairo pango



smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature
___
macports-users mailing list
macports-users@lists.macosforge.org
http://lists.macosforge.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/macports-users


Re: apache2 httpd 2.4.2

2012-05-23 Thread Daniel J. Luke
On May 23, 2012, at 2:49 PM, Bjarne D Mathiesen wrote:
 mod_fastcgi   @2.4.6  www/mod_fastcgi
 - doesn't install
 - should be replaced by mod_fcgid
 - anybody using this ... then yell _loudly_

Note that mod_fcgid doesn't support FastCGIExternalServer it may be possible 
(for some uses) to use mod_proxy (with or without mod_proxy_fcgi) instead.

I would be surprised if there isn't an upstream patch for apache2.4 support 
(and/or a patch in some other packager's system that we can use).

--
Daniel J. Luke  
 
++  
  
| * dl...@geeklair.net * |  

| *-- http://www.geeklair.net -* |  

++  
  
|   Opinions expressed are mine and do not necessarily   |  

|  reflect the opinions of my employer.  |  

++



___
macports-users mailing list
macports-users@lists.macosforge.org
http://lists.macosforge.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/macports-users


Re: [enhancement] proposal - make all ports independent of which version of Perl is installed or the major one

2012-05-23 Thread Bjarne D Mathiesen
http://lists.macosforge.org/pipermail/macports-dev/2012-May/019336.html
http://lists.macosforge.org/pipermail/macports-dev/2012-May/019338.html

It's now been almost a week with no activity in this thread
and no resolution in sight as to what we do as a group.

Presently, Perl 5.16.0 has just been released, and the maintainer of the
main perl ports hasn't reacted at all in this thread.

I've done the preliminary work in bringing Perl 5.16 into MacPorts in
https://trac.macports.org/ticket/34570
Presently, I can't get my perl5.16 port to generate the sub-ports ... I
simply don't know enough to see what's wrong with my approach, but my
present assumption is that it's because I'm copying my modified
_resources/port1.0/group/perl5-1.0.tcl file into place instead of
getting it from a repo.

Now, we do have 96 ports that have perl5.12 hardcoded into them.
That means, that they are presently 2 (two) years behind schedule as I
see it.

If we don't come to a resolution as a group, I'll just implement my own
solution and post my procedure here on the lists for other interested
parties should they be interested.

:-)
-- 
Bjarne D Mathiesen
København N ; Danmark ; Europa
--
denne besked er skrevet i et totalt M$-frit miljø
MacOS X 10.7.3 Lion ; 2.8GHz Intel Core i7 ; 16GB 1067MHz DDR3
___
macports-users mailing list
macports-users@lists.macosforge.org
http://lists.macosforge.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/macports-users


Re: apache2 httpd 2.4.2

2012-05-23 Thread Bjarne D Mathiesen
Daniel J. Luke wrote:
 On May 23, 2012, at 2:49 PM, Bjarne D Mathiesen wrote:
 mod_fastcgi  @2.4.6  www/mod_fastcgi
 - doesn't install
 - should be replaced by mod_fcgid
 - anybody using this ... then yell _loudly_
 
 Note that mod_fcgid doesn't support FastCGIExternalServer it may be possible 
 (for some uses) to use mod_proxy (with or without mod_proxy_fcgi) instead.
 
 I would be surprised if there isn't an upstream patch for apache2.4 support 
 (and/or a patch in some other packager's system that we can use).
 
 --
 Daniel J. Luke


I can't find anything -
neither on the main page of the developers, nor anywhere else

http://www.fastcgi.com/drupal/node/19
Current version of mod_fastcgi is 2.4.6.
Last updated November 13th, 2007.

Neither does this problem seem to have been discussed on the maillist
for the developers ...
http://mailman.fastcgi.com/pipermail/fastcgi-developers/

Daniel, are you actively using this module ???

:-)
-- 
Bjarne D Mathiesen
København N ; Danmark ; Europa
--
denne besked er skrevet i et totalt M$-frit miljø
MacOS X 10.7.3 Lion ; 2.8GHz Intel Core i7 ; 16GB 1067MHz DDR3
___
macports-users mailing list
macports-users@lists.macosforge.org
http://lists.macosforge.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/macports-users


Re: confusion

2012-05-23 Thread Emden R. Gansner

On 5/23/12 2:49 PM, Jeremy Lavergne wrote:

I'd recommend cleaning deactivate and trying again:
  sudo port clean cairo pango
  sudo port -f deactivate cairo pango
  sudo port install cairo pango

Thank you. That worked.

Emden

___
macports-users mailing list
macports-users@lists.macosforge.org
http://lists.macosforge.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/macports-users


Re: apache2 httpd 2.4.2

2012-05-23 Thread Daniel J. Luke
On May 23, 2012, at 3:19 PM, Bjarne D Mathiesen wrote:
 I can't find anything -
 neither on the main page of the developers, nor anywhere else

That's fairly normal for the upstream developers... IIRC it required patching 
for a considerable amount of time to build/work with apache2.2 before there was 
a release with support in it.

I did find a patch here (I didn't review it for quality or functionality):

https://github.com/ByteInternet/libapache-mod-fastcgi

 http://www.fastcgi.com/drupal/node/19
 Current version of mod_fastcgi is 2.4.6.
 Last updated November 13th, 2007.

The latest SNAP release (snapshot of the upstream revision control) is from 
2009, I don't know if their revision control system is publicly available or 
not.

 Neither does this problem seem to have been discussed on the maillist
 for the developers ...
 http://mailman.fastcgi.com/pipermail/fastcgi-developers/
 
 Daniel, are you actively using this module ???


We use it some at $WORK, and I've used it in the past on a personal machine. I 
was the previous maintainer of the port, but gave it up when I stopped actively 
using the module.

If someone has the time, it would probably be worthwhile to post to their 
mailing list asking about it (and possibly that person would also want to 
maintain the port in macports :) ).

--
Daniel J. Luke  
 
++  
  
| * dl...@geeklair.net * |  

| *-- http://www.geeklair.net -* |  

++  
  
|   Opinions expressed are mine and do not necessarily   |  

|  reflect the opinions of my employer.  |  

++



___
macports-users mailing list
macports-users@lists.macosforge.org
http://lists.macosforge.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/macports-users


gcc44 installs correctly but default gcc is still used

2012-05-23 Thread Josie Reinhardt
 This is probably a very unix newby question so I'm sorry to ask it, but I
 can't find a good solution in the current tickets, guide or via
 googling...

 I followed this guide (http://jswails.wikidot.com/mac-os-x) to install
 macports, and use it to update to v 4.4 of the gcc compiler.  Note that I
 am not doing this for the purpose of using the program that the guide-
 maker is trying to install (amber).  I need gcc4.4 for another reason
 entirely.

 Everything appears to be installed properly based on the output when I run
 install and select again.  However, when I run gcc, it's clear that
 gcc 4.2 (the default for me) is still being used  (see below).

 How do I get my computer to actually use the ported version (gcc4.4)?

 

 $ sudo port install gcc44 gcc_select
 Password:
 ---  Computing dependencies for gcc44
 ---  Cleaning gcc44
 ---  Cleaning gcc_select
 ---  Scanning binaries for linking errors: 100.0%
 ---  No broken files found.
 $ sudo port select gcc mp-gcc44
 Selecting 'mp-gcc44' for 'gcc' succeeded. 'mp-gcc44' is now active.
 $ gcc
 i686-apple-darwin10-gcc-4.2.1: no input files
___
macports-users mailing list
macports-users@lists.macosforge.org
http://lists.macosforge.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/macports-users


Re: gcc44 installs correctly but default gcc is still used

2012-05-23 Thread Frank Schima

On May 23, 2012, at 2:08 PM, Josie Reinhardt wrote:

 This is probably a very unix newby question so I'm sorry to ask it, but I
 can't find a good solution in the current tickets, guide or via
 googling...
 
 I followed this guide (http://jswails.wikidot.com/mac-os-x) to install
 macports, and use it to update to v 4.4 of the gcc compiler.  Note that I
 am not doing this for the purpose of using the program that the guide-
 maker is trying to install (amber).  I need gcc4.4 for another reason
 entirely.
 
 Everything appears to be installed properly based on the output when I run
 install and select again.  However, when I run gcc, it's clear that
 gcc 4.2 (the default for me) is still being used  (see below).
 
 How do I get my computer to actually use the ported version (gcc4.4)?
 
 
 
 $ sudo port install gcc44 gcc_select
 Password:
 ---  Computing dependencies for gcc44
 ---  Cleaning gcc44
 ---  Cleaning gcc_select
 ---  Scanning binaries for linking errors: 100.0%
 ---  No broken files found.
 $ sudo port select gcc mp-gcc44
 Selecting 'mp-gcc44' for 'gcc' succeeded. 'mp-gcc44' is now active.
 $ gcc
 i686-apple-darwin10-gcc-4.2.1: no input files
 ___
 macports-users mailing list
 macports-users@lists.macosforge.org
 http://lists.macosforge.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/macports-users


Did you try in a new Terminal window?

Looks like you have a path problem. What is the output of the following 3 
statements - one at a time?

which gcc
echo $PATH
ls -l /opt/local/bin/gcc


Cheers!
Frank

___
macports-users mailing list
macports-users@lists.macosforge.org
http://lists.macosforge.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/macports-users


Re: gcc44 installs correctly but default gcc is still used

2012-05-23 Thread Josie Reinhardt
Thanks for your reply,

$ which gcc
/usr/bin/gcc

$ echo $PATH
/usr/bin:/bin:/usr/sbin:/sbin:/usr/local/bin:/usr/X11/bin:/sw/bin/:/sw/sbin/:/usr/local/bin/:/usr/local/sbin/:/bin/:/sbin:/usr/bin/:/usr/sbin/:/opt/local/bin/:/opt/local/sbin:/usr/local/mysql/bin/:/sw/bin/:(various
application specific paths)

$ ls -l /opt/local/bin/gcc/
-rwxr-xr-x  3 root  admin  342200 Apr 17 00:32 /opt/local/bin/gcc/

Josie


On Wed, May 23, 2012 at 4:25 PM, Frank Schima
macsforever2...@macports.org wrote:

 On May 23, 2012, at 2:08 PM, Josie Reinhardt wrote:

 This is probably a very unix newby question so I'm sorry to ask it, but I
 can't find a good solution in the current tickets, guide or via
 googling...

 I followed this guide (http://jswails.wikidot.com/mac-os-x) to install
 macports, and use it to update to v 4.4 of the gcc compiler.  Note that I
 am not doing this for the purpose of using the program that the guide-
 maker is trying to install (amber).  I need gcc4.4 for another reason
 entirely.

 Everything appears to be installed properly based on the output when I run
 install and select again.  However, when I run gcc, it's clear that
 gcc 4.2 (the default for me) is still being used  (see below).

 How do I get my computer to actually use the ported version (gcc4.4)?

 

 $ sudo port install gcc44 gcc_select
 Password:
 ---  Computing dependencies for gcc44
 ---  Cleaning gcc44
 ---  Cleaning gcc_select
 ---  Scanning binaries for linking errors: 100.0%
 ---  No broken files found.
 $ sudo port select gcc mp-gcc44
 Selecting 'mp-gcc44' for 'gcc' succeeded. 'mp-gcc44' is now active.
 $ gcc
 i686-apple-darwin10-gcc-4.2.1: no input files
 ___
 macports-users mailing list
 macports-users@lists.macosforge.org
 http://lists.macosforge.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/macports-users


 Did you try in a new Terminal window?

 Looks like you have a path problem. What is the output of the following 3 
 statements - one at a time?

 which gcc
 echo $PATH
 ls -l /opt/local/bin/gcc


 Cheers!
 Frank

___
macports-users mailing list
macports-users@lists.macosforge.org
http://lists.macosforge.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/macports-users


Re: gcc44 installs correctly but default gcc is still used

2012-05-23 Thread Jeremy Lavergne
 $ echo $PATH
 /usr/bin:/bin:/usr/sbin:/sbin:/usr/local/bin:/usr/X11/bin:/sw/bin/:/sw/sbin/:/usr/local/bin/:/usr/local/sbin/:/bin/:/sbin:/usr/bin/:/usr/sbin/:/opt/local/bin/:/opt/local/sbin:/usr/local/mysql/bin/:/sw/bin/:(various
 application specific paths)

That's a mess... 

Your issue is /opt/local/bin needs to come before /usr/bin; once the MacPorts 
gcc symlink is used then using `port select...` will switch it to point to the 
gcc you ask it to select.



smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature
___
macports-users mailing list
macports-users@lists.macosforge.org
http://lists.macosforge.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/macports-users


Re: gcc44 installs correctly but default gcc is still used

2012-05-23 Thread Josie Reinhardt
I changed ~/.profile to:

PATH=$PATH:/opt/local/bin/:/opt/local/sbin/
export PATH

but something keeps adding /usr/bin, etc back in before /opt/local/bin/

$ echo $PATH
/usr/bin:/bin:/usr/sbin:/sbin:/usr/local/bin:/usr/X11/bin:/opt/local/bin/:/opt/local/sbin/

I've tried to find another .profile .bash_profile or .bashrc file that
could be overriding but I can't find it?

On Wed, May 23, 2012 at 4:40 PM, Jeremy Lavergne
jer...@lavergne.gotdns.org wrote:
 $ echo $PATH
 /usr/bin:/bin:/usr/sbin:/sbin:/usr/local/bin:/usr/X11/bin:/sw/bin/:/sw/sbin/:/usr/local/bin/:/usr/local/sbin/:/bin/:/sbin:/usr/bin/:/usr/sbin/:/opt/local/bin/:/opt/local/sbin:/usr/local/mysql/bin/:/sw/bin/:(various
 application specific paths)

 That's a mess...

 Your issue is /opt/local/bin needs to come before /usr/bin; once the MacPorts 
 gcc symlink is used then using `port select...` will switch it to point to 
 the gcc you ask it to select.

___
macports-users mailing list
macports-users@lists.macosforge.org
http://lists.macosforge.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/macports-users


Re: mysql55 up and running on production

2012-05-23 Thread Ryan Schmidt

On May 23, 2012, at 10:06, Watch Dog wrote:

 On Wed, May 23, 2012 at 7:35 AM, Bjarne D Mathiesen wrote:
 Some recent changes that pixilla made to the port file breaks a normal
 install :
 https://trac.macports.org/ticket/34552
 https://trac.macports.org/changeset/93312
 
 Ah, yes, pixilla.  Commit w/o testing, again.  Maybe time to
 reconsider commit privileges?

We're all entitled to make a mistake every once in awhile. Bradley's commit 
privileges are not getting revoked anytime soon. I'm very grateful to Bradley 
for volunteering to take over the MySQL ports from me, for his work on the 
almost 700 other ports he maintains, and for everything else he does for 
MacPorts. Remember that we're volunteers here, and all we ask in return for our 
work on MacPorts is a little patience and occasional appreciation. Cooperation 
is great too: If you know how to fix #34552, by all means attach a patch to 
that ticket.




___
macports-users mailing list
macports-users@lists.macosforge.org
http://lists.macosforge.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/macports-users


Re: Error installing xorg-server

2012-05-23 Thread Ryan Schmidt

On May 23, 2012, at 08:33, thedan...@nifty-neat.com wrote:

 Okay, here is the tail end of the log file. Hope it helps:

Unfortunately none of that was the actual error message we need to see.

 main.log is 5.8MB - too big for me to email. If you want the whole log file, 
 I can post it online for you to download. LMK

I suggest you file a ticket in the issue tracker, compress the log, and attach 
it there.


___
macports-users mailing list
macports-users@lists.macosforge.org
http://lists.macosforge.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/macports-users


Re: gcc44 installs correctly but default gcc is still used

2012-05-23 Thread Frank Schima

On May 23, 2012, at 2:57 PM, Josie Reinhardt wrote:

 I changed ~/.profile to:
 
 PATH=$PATH:/opt/local/bin/:/opt/local/sbin/
 export PATH
 
 but something keeps adding /usr/bin, etc back in before /opt/local/bin/
 
 $ echo $PATH
 /usr/bin:/bin:/usr/sbin:/sbin:/usr/local/bin:/usr/X11/bin:/opt/local/bin/:/opt/local/sbin/
 
 I've tried to find another .profile .bash_profile or .bashrc file that
 could be overriding but I can't find it?

Indeed it is exactly what you set. The suggested path to use according to the 
guide [1] is as follows:

export PATH=/opt/local/bin:/opt/local/sbin:$PATH


Cheers!
Frank

[1] https://trac.macports.org/wiki/InstallingMacPorts


___
macports-users mailing list
macports-users@lists.macosforge.org
http://lists.macosforge.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/macports-users


Re: gcc44 installs correctly but default gcc is still used

2012-05-23 Thread Josie Reinhardt
export PATH=/opt/local/bin:/opt/local/sbin:$PATH


On Wed, May 23, 2012 at 5:04 PM, Frank Schima
macsforever2...@macports.org wrote:

 On May 23, 2012, at 2:57 PM, Josie Reinhardt wrote:

 I changed ~/.profile to:

 PATH=$PATH:/opt/local/bin/:/opt/local/sbin/
 export PATH

 but something keeps adding /usr/bin, etc back in before /opt/local/bin/

 $ echo $PATH
 /usr/bin:/bin:/usr/sbin:/sbin:/usr/local/bin:/usr/X11/bin:/opt/local/bin/:/opt/local/sbin/

 I've tried to find another .profile .bash_profile or .bashrc file that
 could be overriding but I can't find it?

 Indeed it is exactly what you set. The suggested path to use according to the 
 guide [1] is as follows:

 export PATH=/opt/local/bin:/opt/local/sbin:$PATH


 Cheers!
 Frank

 [1] https://trac.macports.org/wiki/InstallingMacPorts



Frank and Jeremy, thanks for so cheerfully dealing with newby me.  I
think it's working now:

$ which gcc
/opt/local/bin/gcc

But for whatever reason the PATH I'm getting back is _not_ what I set
in ~/.profile:

Here's the entirety of .profile (now that I've cleaned it up):
export PATH=/opt/local/bin:/opt/local/sbin:$PATH

But when I open a new terminal and echo path I get
$ echo $PATH
/opt/local/bin:/opt/local/sbin:/usr/bin:/bin:/usr/sbin:/sbin:/usr/local/bin:/usr/X11/bin

Still at least now /opt/local/bin are in front...  but where did the
other stuff come from???

Josie
___
macports-users mailing list
macports-users@lists.macosforge.org
http://lists.macosforge.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/macports-users


Re: gcc44 installs correctly but default gcc is still used

2012-05-23 Thread Dominik Reichardt
The other stuff is what PATH is normally set to.

When you do that export in .profile
 export PATH=/opt/local/bin:/opt/local/sbin:$PATH

you are using the old PATH variable with the $PATH part. That's where it comes 
from ;)
But if you wonder where the system sets this default path... then I can't help 
you ;)

Dom

Am 23.05.2012 um 23:19 schrieb Josie Reinhardt josiezieg...@gmail.com:

 export PATH=/opt/local/bin:/opt/local/sbin:$PATH
 
 
 On Wed, May 23, 2012 at 5:04 PM, Frank Schima
 macsforever2...@macports.org wrote:
 
 On May 23, 2012, at 2:57 PM, Josie Reinhardt wrote:
 
 I changed ~/.profile to:
 
 PATH=$PATH:/opt/local/bin/:/opt/local/sbin/
 export PATH
 
 but something keeps adding /usr/bin, etc back in before /opt/local/bin/
 
 $ echo $PATH
 /usr/bin:/bin:/usr/sbin:/sbin:/usr/local/bin:/usr/X11/bin:/opt/local/bin/:/opt/local/sbin/
 
 I've tried to find another .profile .bash_profile or .bashrc file that
 could be overriding but I can't find it?
 
 Indeed it is exactly what you set. The suggested path to use according to 
 the guide [1] is as follows:
 
 export PATH=/opt/local/bin:/opt/local/sbin:$PATH
 
 
 Cheers!
 Frank
 
 [1] https://trac.macports.org/wiki/InstallingMacPorts
 
 
 
 Frank and Jeremy, thanks for so cheerfully dealing with newby me.  I
 think it's working now:
 
 $ which gcc
 /opt/local/bin/gcc
 
 But for whatever reason the PATH I'm getting back is _not_ what I set
 in ~/.profile:
 
 Here's the entirety of .profile (now that I've cleaned it up):
 export PATH=/opt/local/bin:/opt/local/sbin:$PATH
 
 But when I open a new terminal and echo path I get
 $ echo $PATH
 /opt/local/bin:/opt/local/sbin:/usr/bin:/bin:/usr/sbin:/sbin:/usr/local/bin:/usr/X11/bin
 
 Still at least now /opt/local/bin are in front...  but where did the
 other stuff come from???
 
 Josie
 ___
 macports-users mailing list
 macports-users@lists.macosforge.org
 http://lists.macosforge.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/macports-users
___
macports-users mailing list
macports-users@lists.macosforge.org
http://lists.macosforge.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/macports-users


Re: gcc44 installs correctly but default gcc is still used

2012-05-23 Thread Lawrence Velázquez
On May 23, 2012, at 5:19 p.m., Josie Reinhardt wrote:

 Still at least now /opt/local/bin are in front...  but where did the
 other stuff come from???


The system-level shell startup files (/etc/{profile,zshenv,csh.login}) execute 
the /usr/libexec/path_helper utility, which sets the initial ${PATH}.

When constructing ${PATH}, path_helper consults the file /etc/paths and the 
contents of /etc/paths.d/.

Try man path_helper for more.

vq

___
macports-users mailing list
macports-users@lists.macosforge.org
http://lists.macosforge.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/macports-users


Re: mysql55 up and running on production

2012-05-23 Thread Watch Dog
On Wed, May 23, 2012 at 2:58 PM, Ryan Schmidt ryandes...@macports.org wrote:

 On May 23, 2012, at 10:06, Watch Dog wrote:

 On Wed, May 23, 2012 at 7:35 AM, Bjarne D Mathiesen wrote:
 Some recent changes that pixilla made to the port file breaks a normal
 install :
 https://trac.macports.org/ticket/34552
 https://trac.macports.org/changeset/93312

 Ah, yes, pixilla.  Commit w/o testing, again.  Maybe time to
 reconsider commit privileges?

 We're all entitled to make a mistake every once in awhile. Bradley's commit 
 privileges are not getting revoked anytime soon. I'm very grateful to Bradley 
 for volunteering to take over the MySQL ports from me, for his work on the 
 almost 700 other ports he maintains, and for everything else he does for 
 MacPorts. Remember that we're volunteers here, and all we ask in return for 
 our work on MacPorts is a little patience and occasional appreciation. 
 Cooperation is great too: If you know how to fix #34552, by all means attach 
 a patch to that ticket.

Mistakes are one thing.  But this was a change to a working port and
the change broke a normal install of the port.  So it seems a safe
bet that the change was not tested adequately (maybe not at all).

Being a volunteer should not be equated with being unaccountable.

How to fix: revert until a proper fix is available.  Putting such an
important port in a broken state is not nice.

WD
___
macports-users mailing list
macports-users@lists.macosforge.org
http://lists.macosforge.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/macports-users


Re: mysql55 up and running on production

2012-05-23 Thread Jeremy Lavergne
 Being a volunteer should not be equated with being unaccountable.

MacPorts is actually provided as-is, and its contributors cannot be held liable 
for anything.



smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature
___
macports-users mailing list
macports-users@lists.macosforge.org
http://lists.macosforge.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/macports-users


Re: mysql55 up and running on production

2012-05-23 Thread Bjarne D Mathiesen
Watch Dog wrote:
 On Wed, May 23, 2012 at 2:58 PM, Ryan Schmidt ryandes...@macports.org wrote:

 On May 23, 2012, at 10:06, Watch Dog wrote:

 On Wed, May 23, 2012 at 7:35 AM, Bjarne D Mathiesen wrote:
 Some recent changes that pixilla made to the port file breaks a normal
 install :
 https://trac.macports.org/ticket/34552
 https://trac.macports.org/changeset/93312

 Ah, yes, pixilla.  Commit w/o testing, again.  Maybe time to
 reconsider commit privileges?

 We're all entitled to make a mistake every once in awhile. Bradley's commit 
 privileges are not getting revoked anytime soon. I'm very grateful to 
 Bradley for volunteering to take over the MySQL ports from me, for his work 
 on the almost 700 other ports he maintains, and for everything else he does 
 for MacPorts. Remember that we're volunteers here, and all we ask in return 
 for our work on MacPorts is a little patience and occasional appreciation. 
 Cooperation is great too: If you know how to fix #34552, by all means attach 
 a patch to that ticket.
 
 Mistakes are one thing.  But this was a change to a working port and
 the change broke a normal install of the port.  So it seems a safe
 bet that the change was not tested adequately (maybe not at all).
 
 Being a volunteer should not be equated with being unaccountable.
 
 How to fix: revert until a proper fix is available.  Putting such an
 important port in a broken state is not nice.
 
 WD

I fully support Ryan in this.

I do know that many people consider anonymity on the net important - and
I do see the value in certain cases - but I can't take a person in this
case critizising pixilla and being anonymous seriously.

WD :: Use your real name - or loose your standing !!!

-- 
Bjarne D Mathiesen
København N ; Danmark ; Europa
--
denne besked er skrevet i et totalt M$-frit miljø
MacOS X 10.7.3 Lion ; 2.8GHz Intel Core i7 ; 16GB 1067MHz DDR3
___
macports-users mailing list
macports-users@lists.macosforge.org
http://lists.macosforge.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/macports-users


Re: mysql55 up and running on production

2012-05-23 Thread Lawrence Velázquez
On May 23, 2012, at 7:39 p.m., Watch Dog wrote:

 Mistakes are one thing.  But this was a change to a working port and
 the change broke a normal install of the port.  So it seems a safe
 bet that the change was not tested adequately (maybe not at all).


According to his comment[1] on the ticket, Bradley did do some local testing; 
it also successfully builds on the buildbot. It's not unreasonable that he 
thought it was ready to commit.

[1] https://trac.macports.org/ticket/34552#comment:3

vq

___
macports-users mailing list
macports-users@lists.macosforge.org
http://lists.macosforge.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/macports-users


Re: mysql55 up and running on production

2012-05-23 Thread Ryan Schmidt

On May 23, 2012, at 18:39, Watch Dog wrote:

 On Wed, May 23, 2012 at 2:58 PM, Ryan Schmidt ryandes...@macports.org wrote:
 
 On May 23, 2012, at 10:06, Watch Dog wrote:
 
 On Wed, May 23, 2012 at 7:35 AM, Bjarne D Mathiesen wrote:
 Some recent changes that pixilla made to the port file breaks a normal
 install :
 https://trac.macports.org/ticket/34552
 https://trac.macports.org/changeset/93312
 
 Ah, yes, pixilla.  Commit w/o testing, again.  Maybe time to
 reconsider commit privileges?
 
 We're all entitled to make a mistake every once in awhile. Bradley's commit 
 privileges are not getting revoked anytime soon. I'm very grateful to 
 Bradley for volunteering to take over the MySQL ports from me, for his work 
 on the almost 700 other ports he maintains, and for everything else he does 
 for MacPorts. Remember that we're volunteers here, and all we ask in return 
 for our work on MacPorts is a little patience and occasional appreciation. 
 Cooperation is great too: If you know how to fix #34552, by all means attach 
 a patch to that ticket.
 
 Mistakes are one thing.  But this was a change to a working port and
 the change broke a normal install of the port.  So it seems a safe
 bet that the change was not tested adequately (maybe not at all).
 
 Being a volunteer should not be equated with being unaccountable.
 
 How to fix: revert until a proper fix is available.  Putting such an
 important port in a broken state is not nice.

It should be noted that mysql55 is a new port. It did not exist until two 
months ago. So I do not consider breakage in this port to be a catastrophe at 
this point. If the build fails for you, then you can simply continue using the 
previous version that you built. We are still in a transition period, from the 
old mysql5 port to the new mysql51 / mysql55 ports. Most users are expected to 
still be using the old mysql5 port, since that's what most of the other ports 
that require MySQL are still depending on. Bradley is in the process of 
preparing updates to all of those ports so that they can depend on either 
mysql51 or mysql55. Once that's done, the old mysql5 port will be deprecated 
and a proper migration path (via the replaced_by mechanism) will be available. 
Until then, users use mysql55 at their own risk. Of course, as Jeremy pointed 
out, users always use all of MacPorts at their own risk.

This particular change Bradley made was of course made with the best 
intentions, that of getting the mysql55 port to be distributable—meaning that 
it and all of its dependencies are in license harmony and we are thus legally 
permitted to distribute a binary of it, thus making installation very quick, 
instead of having to wait for things to compile. Bradley explained in the 
ticket that this result was successfully achieved on his own system and by the 
buildbot. Meanwhile it failed to build on my system, on yours, and for some 
other users. Bradley is currently trying to isolate what's different between 
these systems to see how to fix it. Just as any of us would try to investigate 
why any other problem occurs.



___
macports-users mailing list
macports-users@lists.macosforge.org
http://lists.macosforge.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/macports-users


Re: mysql55 up and running on production

2012-05-23 Thread Watch Dog
On Wed, May 23, 2012 at 6:23 PM, Ryan Schmidt ryandes...@macports.org wrote:

 On May 23, 2012, at 18:39, Watch Dog wrote:

 On Wed, May 23, 2012 at 2:58 PM, Ryan Schmidt ryandes...@macports.org 
 wrote:

 On May 23, 2012, at 10:06, Watch Dog wrote:

 On Wed, May 23, 2012 at 7:35 AM, Bjarne D Mathiesen wrote:
 Some recent changes that pixilla made to the port file breaks a normal
 install :
 https://trac.macports.org/ticket/34552
 https://trac.macports.org/changeset/93312

 Ah, yes, pixilla.  Commit w/o testing, again.  Maybe time to
 reconsider commit privileges?

 We're all entitled to make a mistake every once in awhile. Bradley's commit 
 privileges are not getting revoked anytime soon. I'm very grateful to 
 Bradley for volunteering to take over the MySQL ports from me, for his work 
 on the almost 700 other ports he maintains, and for everything else he does 
 for MacPorts. Remember that we're volunteers here, and all we ask in return 
 for our work on MacPorts is a little patience and occasional appreciation. 
 Cooperation is great too: If you know how to fix #34552, by all means 
 attach a patch to that ticket.

 Mistakes are one thing.  But this was a change to a working port and
 the change broke a normal install of the port.  So it seems a safe
 bet that the change was not tested adequately (maybe not at all).

 Being a volunteer should not be equated with being unaccountable.

 How to fix: revert until a proper fix is available.  Putting such an
 important port in a broken state is not nice.

 It should be noted that mysql55 is a new port. It did not exist until two 
 months ago. So I do not consider breakage in this port to be a catastrophe at 
 this point. If the build fails for you, then you can simply continue using 
 the previous version that you built. We are still in a transition period, 
 from the old mysql5 port to the new mysql51 / mysql55 ports. Most users are 
 expected to still be using the old mysql5 port, since that's what most of the 
 other ports that require MySQL are still depending on. Bradley is in the 
 process of preparing updates to all of those ports so that they can depend on 
 either mysql51 or mysql55. Once that's done, the old mysql5 port will be 
 deprecated and a proper migration path (via the replaced_by mechanism) will 
 be available. Until then, users use mysql55 at their own risk. Of course, as 
 Jeremy pointed out, users always use all of MacPorts at their own risk.

 This particular change Bradley made was of course made with the best 
 intentions, that of getting the mysql55 port to be distributable—meaning 
 that it and all of its dependencies are in license harmony and we are thus 
 legally permitted to distribute a binary of it, thus making installation very 
 quick, instead of having to wait for things to compile. Bradley explained in 
 the ticket that this result was successfully achieved on his own system and 
 by the buildbot. Meanwhile it failed to build on my system, on yours, and for 
 some other users. Bradley is currently trying to isolate what's different 
 between these systems to see how to fix it. Just as any of us would try to 
 investigate why any other problem occurs.


My only other experience with breakage caused by pixilla was the dbus
debacle, which was not tested adequately (tested against a private
version of not yet released 2.1, not the officially available release
at that time).

Clearly there is more to the story in this case than I understood, and
I jumped to conclusions.  I apologize.

WD
___
macports-users mailing list
macports-users@lists.macosforge.org
http://lists.macosforge.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/macports-users


What is mp-gcc?

2012-05-23 Thread Peng Yu
Hi,

I see mp-gcc*. I can find what mp stands for? Could anybody let me
know? Thanks!

~$ port select --list gcc
Available versions for gcc:
gcc40
gcc42
llvm-gcc42
mp-gcc44
mp-gcc45
mp-gcc46
none (active)


-- 
Regards,
Peng
___
macports-users mailing list
macports-users@lists.macosforge.org
http://lists.macosforge.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/macports-users


Re: What is mp-gcc?

2012-05-23 Thread Jeremy Lavergne
 I see mp-gcc*. I can find what mp stands for? Could anybody let me
 know? Thanks!

MacPorts



smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature
___
macports-users mailing list
macports-users@lists.macosforge.org
http://lists.macosforge.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/macports-users


Re: mysql55 up and running on production

2012-05-23 Thread Watch Dog
On Wed, May 23, 2012 at 6:13 PM, Bjarne D Mathiesen
macint...@mathiesen.info wrote:
 I do know that many people consider anonymity on the net important - and
 I do see the value in certain cases - but I can't take a person in this
 case critizising pixilla and being anonymous seriously.

 WD :: Use your real name - or loose your standing !!!

Whether I use something that looks like a real name is irrelevant.  I
could use the name Chad Smith, but it would offer no certainty that it
is really my name.

But since you insist: T. Chad Gow (google that and cf. above comment)
is my name, and I don't recall a time when I liked it.  What kid likes
having only a 'T' for a first name?  It is not an abbreviation for
anything, it is just 'T'.  As a kid, a friend noted that it is an
anagram of Watch Dog, so that is how I became known in school.  I
prefer it and use almost exclusively.  If that troubles you, add me to
your kill file.

WD
___
macports-users mailing list
macports-users@lists.macosforge.org
http://lists.macosforge.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/macports-users


Re: What is mp-gcc?

2012-05-23 Thread Ryan Schmidt

On May 23, 2012, at 20:36, Peng Yu wrote:

 I see mp-gcc*. I can find what mp stands for? Could anybody let me
 know? Thanks!
 
 ~$ port select --list gcc
 Available versions for gcc:
   gcc40
   gcc42
   llvm-gcc42
   mp-gcc44
   mp-gcc45
   mp-gcc46
   none (active)

mp stands for MacPorts. These are the MacPorts gcc ports (gcc45, gcc46, 
etc.), as distinct from the versions of gcc that are included with Xcode.


___
macports-users mailing list
macports-users@lists.macosforge.org
http://lists.macosforge.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/macports-users


Re: mysql55 up and running on production

2012-05-23 Thread Jeremy Lavergne
 Whether I use something that looks like a real name is irrelevant.

When sending a series of pretentious emails, using an obviously false name just 
makes reading the messages upsetting.



smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature
___
macports-users mailing list
macports-users@lists.macosforge.org
http://lists.macosforge.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/macports-users


Do I have correct boost python installed?

2012-05-23 Thread Peng Yu
Hi,

I have boost installed.

~$ port installed|grep boost
  boost @1.48.0_4
  boost @1.49.0_0 (active)

I have the python directory.

/opt/local/include/boost$ ls -d python
python

But I don't find the library file. How to get library files installed? Thanks!

/opt/local/include/boost$ ll /opt/local/lib/libboost_py*
ls: cannot access /opt/local/lib/libboost_py*: No such file or directory

-- 
Regards,
Peng
___
macports-users mailing list
macports-users@lists.macosforge.org
http://lists.macosforge.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/macports-users


Re: Do I have correct boost python installed?

2012-05-23 Thread Ryan Schmidt

On May 23, 2012, at 20:52, Peng Yu wrote:

 I have boost installed.
 
 ~$ port installed|grep boost
  boost @1.48.0_4
  boost @1.49.0_0 (active)
 
 I have the python directory.
 
 /opt/local/include/boost$ ls -d python
 python
 
 But I don't find the library file. How to get library files installed? Thanks!

Reinstall boost with the python variant corresponding to the version of python 
with which you want to use boost:

$ port variants boost
boost has the variants:
   debug: Builds debug versions of the libraries as well
   no_single: Disable building single-threaded libraries
   no_static: Disable building static libraries
   openmpi: Build Boost.MPI
 * conflicts with debug
   python25: Build Boost.Python for Python 2.5
 * conflicts with debug python26 python27 python31 python32
   python26: Build Boost.Python for Python 2.6
 * conflicts with debug python25 python27 python31 python32
   python27: Build Boost.Python for Python 2.7
 * conflicts with debug python25 python26 python31 python32
   python31: Build Boost.Python for Python 3.1
 * conflicts with debug python25 python26 python27 python32
   python32: Build Boost.Python for Python 3.2
 * conflicts with debug python25 python26 python27 python31
   regex_match_extra: Enable access to extended capture information of 
submatches in Boost.Regex
   universal: Build for multiple architectures


So for example you might use:


sudo port install boost +python27

___
macports-users mailing list
macports-users@lists.macosforge.org
http://lists.macosforge.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/macports-users


Re: mysql55 up and running on production

2012-05-23 Thread Bjarne D Mathiesen
Watch Dog wrote:
 On Wed, May 23, 2012 at 6:13 PM, Bjarne D Mathiesen
 macint...@mathiesen.info wrote:
 I do know that many people consider anonymity on the net important - and
 I do see the value in certain cases - but I can't take a person in this
 case critizising pixilla and being anonymous seriously.

 WD :: Use your real name - or loose your standing !!!
 
 Whether I use something that looks like a real name is irrelevant.  I
 could use the name Chad Smith, but it would offer no certainty that it
 is really my name.

I'm well aware of that.

Lot's of us use nicks, and some of us are almost only known under our
nicks, but eg pixilla connects his nick with his real name. If you had
done that in eg your signature (and furthermore stated that your nick is
an anagram of your given name) I'ld have been totally OK with it.

But another point that didn't sit well with me was that you critized
pixilla without knowing the full story behind the problem. I've seen you
have apologised for that, and for that apology I do thank you :-)

 
 But since you insist: T. Chad Gow (google that and cf. above comment)
 is my name, and I don't recall a time when I liked it.  What kid likes
 having only a 'T' for a first name?  It is not an abbreviation for
 anything, it is just 'T'.  As a kid, a friend noted that it is an
 anagram of Watch Dog, so that is how I became known in school.  I
 prefer it and use almost exclusively.  If that troubles you, add me to
 your kill file.

I don't insist. The choise is your's alone to take.

I must confess that I find it seriously cool to have that anagram, and I
do understand why you'ld prefer using it :-D

Well, as to the 'T', the 'D' in my name is something I voluntarily took
as I, when I was in high school, was known as 'Data' - it wasn't meant
as a compliment but in a derogative way. So, the best way to combat
mobbing is to turn it around and make it into something postive for
yourself, thus deflating the whole point of the mobbing :-D

 
 WD


-- 
Bjarne D Mathiesen
København N ; Danmark ; Europa
--
denne besked er skrevet i et totalt M$-frit miljø
MacOS X 10.7.3 Lion ; 2.8GHz Intel Core i7 ; 16GB 1067MHz DDR3
___
macports-users mailing list
macports-users@lists.macosforge.org
http://lists.macosforge.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/macports-users


Qt debug

2012-05-23 Thread James Linder
Hi
If anyone can save me ages of hunting I'd appreciate it lots:

I built Qt [port install qt4-mac-devel]

I then built my application which fails with:

...
/usr/bin/g++-4.2 -headerpad_max_install_names -arch x86_64 -Xarch_x86_64 
-mmacosx-version-min=10.6 -o vtext.app/Contents/MacOS/vtext obj/main.o 
obj/myxml.o obj/TextOverlay.o obj/moc_TextOverlay.o -L../serial/lib 
-lqextserialport -L/opt/local/lib -lQtXml_debug -lQtGui_debug -lQtCore_debug 
ld: library not found for -lQtXml_debug
collect2: ld returned 1 exit status
make: *** [vtext.app/Contents/MacOS/vtext] Error 1

If I then by hand run the link command without the _debug suffixs then all 
works perfectly.

Where does the macports install of QT store the debug directive?
nothing in my file.pro mentions debug.

Thanks
James
___
macports-users mailing list
macports-users@lists.macosforge.org
http://lists.macosforge.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/macports-users


Re: mysql55 up and running on production

2012-05-23 Thread Ian Wadham
 Watch Dog wrote:
 But since you insist: T. Chad Gow (google that and cf. above comment)
 is my name, and I don't recall a time when I liked it.  What kid likes
 having only a 'T' for a first name?  It is not an abbreviation for
 anything, it is just 'T'.  As a kid, a friend noted that it is an
 anagram of Watch Dog, so that is how I became known in school.

Well, in Australia or the UK, you would probably be called cuppa (T) … :-)

Cheers, Ian W.


___
macports-users mailing list
macports-users@lists.macosforge.org
http://lists.macosforge.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/macports-users