Re: Is there a good version of Time Machine?

2016-02-29 Thread Ryan Schmidt
> On Feb 29, 2016, at 9:24 PM, Ludwig wrote: > > On Mon, 29 Feb 2016, Ryan Schmidt wrote: > >> Backups to a non-Apple network-attached storage (NAS) device that claims to >> have Time Machine support will become corrupted over time, with the >> likelihood increasing

Re: Is there a good version of Time Machine?

2016-02-29 Thread Ludwig
On Mon, 29 Feb 2016, Ryan Schmidt wrote: > Backups to a non-Apple network-attached storage (NAS) device that claims to > have Time Machine support will become corrupted over time, with the > likelihood increasing greatly if backups are attempted over wireless. I have > used this for years, and

Re: Spawning ping for packages.macports.org failed

2016-02-29 Thread Adam Mercer
On Mon, Feb 29, 2016 at 9:09 AM, Daniel J. Luke wrote: > lsof might help you find the culprit - but yeah, you're going to get strange > failures if you're hitting resource limits. I couldn't see anything obvious when I looked after it failed with that error but I'll take

Re: Is there a good version of Time Machine?

2016-02-29 Thread Daniel J. Luke
On Feb 29, 2016, at 1:41 PM, Michael wrote: > Ok, lets see. You had power loss on an external drive, on a Linux system. So > the Linux system was either reporting "file stored on drive" when it was not, or it was just reporting back that the drive said the file was stored

Re: Is there a good version of Time Machine?

2016-02-29 Thread Michael
On 2016-02-29, at 3:35 AM, Ryan Schmidt wrote: > Non-Apple implementations of AFP (i.e. netatalk) are simply not sufficiently > compatible with Apple's implementation to work reliably with Time Machine, no > matter what the third-party vendor trying to sell it to you

Re: Spawning ping for packages.macports.org failed

2016-02-29 Thread Daniel J. Luke
On Feb 28, 2016, at 11:04 PM, Adam Mercer wrote: > I have however found something else weird with this machine, when > trying to install a port I sometimes get the following: > > :debug:archivefetch failed verification with key > /opt/local/share/macports/macports-pubkey.pem

Re: Is there a good version of Time Machine?

2016-02-29 Thread Chris Jones
Hi, On 29/02/16 11:35, Ryan Schmidt wrote: Backups to a locally attached disk work fine. I've used this for years without backups becoming corrupted. Backups to an Apple Time Machine over the network, whether over Ethernet or wireless, work fine. I've used this for years without backups

Re: Is there a good version of Time Machine?

2016-02-29 Thread Ryan Schmidt
Backups to a locally attached disk work fine. I've used this for years without backups becoming corrupted. Backups to an Apple Time Machine over the network, whether over Ethernet or wireless, work fine. I've used this for years without backups becoming corrupted. Backups to Server.app's Time

Re: Trying to execute LibcxxOnOlderSytems (2nd ed.)

2016-02-29 Thread Ryan Schmidt
> On Feb 28, 2016, at 9:33 PM, [ftp83plus] wrote: > > Did that > sudo port clean ld64-136 > and > sudo port clean libcxx > > as ld54-136 failed to compile as a dependency of libcxx. Received: > > Error: Failed to install ld64-136 > Please see the log file for port