On 7/19/12 Jul 19 -9:46 AM, Brandon Allbery wrote:
On Wed, Jul 18, 2012 at 11:58 PM, Robert P. Goldman rpgold...@sift.info
mailto:rpgold...@sift.info wrote:
That fasl (fast load) file is not the problem. It is recompiled as
part of the testing process, so if it still references the
On 7/17/12 Jul 17 -12:41 PM, Brandon Allbery wrote:
On Tue, Jul 17, 2012 at 1:36 PM, Robert Goldman rpgold...@sift.info
mailto:rpgold...@sift.info wrote:
dlopen(/Users/rpg/lisp/asdf/tmp/fasls/ecl-12.2.1-unknown-macosx-x86/test/file3.fas,
10): Library not loaded: /opt/local/lib
When I try to run some test code on this system, I get this error:
LOAD: Could not load file
#P/Users/rpg/lisp/asdf/tmp/fasls/ecl-12.2.1-unknown-macosx-x86/test/file3.fas
(Error:
dlopen(/Users/rpg/lisp/asdf/tmp/fasls/ecl-12.2.1-unknown-macosx-x86/test/file3.fas,
10): Library not loaded:
On Jan 31, 2012, at 21:47, Phil Dobbin wrote:
:info:build plt.h:1: error: ?_getc? undeclared here (not in a function)
:info:build plt.h:2: error: ?_putc? undeclared here (not in a function)
This was mentioned here as well:
https://trac.macports.org/ticket/12906#comment:7
The
I had a crash when trying
port install graphviz
if that helps. I'm afraid I am not a sophisticated enough user to
provide a more helpful bug report. But someone who is more
sophisticated might try this build and be able to generate a useful report.
The crash left my ports in an odd state,
Isn't the right thing to edit /etc/man.conf so that the path - man
translation works, and then make sure that your MANPATH environment
variable is *not* set?
I think Shawn's problem was (at least possibly) not having /opt entries
in /etc/man.conf.
BTW, for people like me who read this as a
Ryan Schmidt wrote:
On Sep 22, 2008, at 6:22 PM, Robert Goldman wrote:
I was trying to 'port install gnucash' the other day, and the building
process failed on some dependencies.
If you show us exactly what error occurred we may be able to help you
diagnose it! :)
Thanks. What I
I was trying to 'port install gnucash' the other day, and the building
process failed on some dependencies. What surprised me was the sheer
scale of the set of dependencies. For example, one of the listed failed
dependencies was 'nautilus'. Isn't this a GNOME file manager GUI? I
can't see why
