Hi,
At 11:27 -0500 on 2008-4-1 Joe Schnide wrote:
I completely deleted macports, did an install from scratch,
installed all the deluge port dependencies and still get the error
below on intel-based macs. The problem is not happening on my g4
macs, just on the intel-based macs. Is there
Hi,
I am having a puzzling experience with the following setting: GNOME
desktop with enlightenment as window manager (set using the WINDOW_MANAGER
environment variable from within .xinitrc). The experience goes as
follows: Everything works as advertised until I upgrade some GNOME
components,
Hi,
At 17:12 +0100 on 2007-12-14 Markus Weissmann wrote:
we're currently working on this; I suppose we'll make the universal
builds 4-way universal (ppc, ppc64, i386, x86_64) in some future
release.
It would also make sense to allow for x86_64 versions only, no? I am
personally not
At 20:01 -0500 on 2007-10-24 Ryan Schmidt wrote:
Nobody forces you to upgrade any port, or any other software on
your machine, for that matter. You can choose to upgrade, or
not.
Yes it does: An automatic `port upgrade outdated' will upgrade
everything. Should I then sit down every
Hi,
Daniel J. Luke wrote:
Macports is run entirely by volunteers, none of whom get paid to do it.
I know, of course; I am myself involved in free software.
If you want some new functionality, the best way to get it is to work
on it and offer it to the community.
As soon as I have the time
Hi,
Barry Schiffman wrote:
1. gedit:
I get down to compiling gedit-languages-manager.o and
the following is reported:
gedit-languages-manager.c:115: error: conflicting
types for 'gdk_color_to_string'
/opt/local/include/gtk-2.0/gdk/gdkcolor.h:137: error:
previous declaration of
paul beard wrote:
On 10/17/07, Stefan Bruda [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
paul beard wrote:
Looks like something needs updating?
Link (dyld) error:
Library not loaded: /opt/local/lib/libgnomecanvas-2.0.dylib
Referenced from: /opt/local/lib/libgnome-desktop-2.2.dylib
Reason
Hi,
My firefox-x11 (2.0.0.7, on an Macbook Pro Core 2 Duo, Mac OS X
10.4.10) refuses to open any file chooser dialogues (noted in the
print to file dialogue and Browse... buttons on various Web pages).
Is this a known issue (and if so how do I fix it) or should I file a
bug report?
Many thanks
Hi,
Stefan Bruda wrote:
Now, is there any trick I need to do in order to be capable to print
from the application? I am getting only a default printer which
does not seem to produce any print job by default.
Just to update myself, It looks like printing works after all, though only
Hi,
Finally Firefox works under X11 on my machine (Macbook Pro) so I could
not be happier. Thank you so much to whomever is responsible for
this.
Now, is there any trick I need to do in order to be capable to print
from the application? I am getting only a default printer which
does not seem
Hi,
Poppler and xpdf conflict with each other in some executable names.
godel:~ port activate poppler @0.6_0
--- Activating poppler 0.6_0
Error: port activate failed: Image error: /opt/local/bin/pdffonts
is being used by the active xpdf port. Please deactivate this
port
Yves de Champlain wrote:
Poppler and xpdf conflict with each other in some executable names.
godel:~ port activate poppler @0.6_0
--- Activating poppler 0.6_0
Error: port activate failed: Image error: /opt/local/bin/pdffonts
is being used by the active xpdf port. Please
Hi,
Thorsten Zoerner wrote:
An idea from some forum was to upgrade Gutenprint from 5.0.1 to 5.1.3.
Okay, but this version does not seem to be available for Macports yet. Or
is it?
Have you tried using Print with Gutenprint instead of Print? Works
very well for me with gutenprint-5.0.1:
Hi,
Jörg Frauendiener wrote:
I installed xfig-3.2.5_1 via macports and it crashes when I click
on a menu button (File,Edit,View,...). Pulling up a dialog box by
a keyboard sequence (e.g. M-o to open) seems to work OK, though.
Any suggestions?
I just came across this thread and was
Hi,
Yves de Champlain wrote:
Le 07-09-16 à 22:54, Stefan Bruda a écrit :
gimp-print is deprecated. gutenprint is the new version (and new
name) of gimp-print, so you should uninstall it.
I kind of figured it out for myself by now. The Print menu however
should cease to offer a gimp
Hi,
Yves de Champlain wrote:
First of all, thanks for your comments. Gimp will soon hit 2.4.0 and
if anything is wrong, now is the time to find it.
Well, thank *you* for getting back to me. Gimp is one of my daily routine
so I appreciate when it works right (and when it does not I
Hi,
At 22:10 -0400 on 2007-9-13 Yves de Champlain wrote:
The latest Gimp (2.4.1) does not seem to go along well with gimp-
print.
Whenever I attempt to print something I get a bus error in
/opt/local/lib/gimp/2.0/plug-ins/print. Last time I checked (with
Gimp
2.2.17)
Hi,
The latest Gimp (2.4.1) does not seem to go along well with gimp-print.
Whenever I attempt to print something I get a bus error in
/opt/local/lib/gimp/2.0/plug-ins/print. Last time I checked (with Gimp
2.2.17) printing was no problem at all. Is there any trick I am missing?
How does one
Hi,
Keith J. Schultz wrote:
What version of the X11 App are you using.
do you have the latest update installed.
Mac OS X 10.4.10 (Intel Macbook Pro C2D), X11 1.1.3, Xcode 2.4, all up to
date according to Apple's Software Update.
I have a Powerbook G4, X11 1.1.3, gnome and
Hi,
I am having some minor problems with Apple-supplied X, in that
transitory effects (I am not sure how to call them, but they include the
save progress bar in Openoffice or the window outlines in technical or
box window movement in E16) do not appear. This becomes aggravating
when doing image
Hi,
Jonathan Stickel wrote:
Searching the list is always useful, as this has just been discussed,
see
http://lists.macosforge.org/pipermail/macports-users/2007-July/004596.html
http://lists.macosforge.org/pipermail/macports-users/2007-July/004620.html
Fair enough. Google searching didn't
Ryan Schmidt wrote:
Err, sorry, I meant the other way around (the upgrade is from
0.3.10_2 to 0.3.12_0).
Then I'm not sure. Perhaps try deactivating the 0.3.10_2 version
first, then install the 0.3.12_0 version.
Thank you for the suggestion, but I must confess I did not expect it to
work
Hi,
Dimitri Hendriks wrote:
Thanks a lot for you help so far. Unfortunately,
the commands you give seem not work for me.
Possibly, I have overlooked something.
It's me who I overlooked two things actually. The first one is that all
the commands I mentioned shoudl be given as root. So you
Ryan Schmidt wrote:
I tried this and xfig then installs fine, but I now get the same
problem as reported earlier:
http://lists.macosforge.org/pipermail/macports-users/2007-April/
002746.html
and:
http://lists.macosforge.org/pipermail/macports-users/2007-June/
003917.html
In the same
Hi,
I am trying to upgrade ffmpeg from 0.4.9-pre1_1 to 0.4.9-pre1_2 and I am
getting in return:
make -C libavformat all
gcc -dynamiclib -Wl,-single_module
-Wl,-install_name,/opt/local/lib/libavformat.dylib,-current_version,51.1.0,-compatibility_version,51.1.0
-Wl,-read_only_relocs,suppress
Hi,
I have been using for a while now gkrellm 2.2.10_0 and I just upgraded to
2.3.0_0. Everything seems to work fine, except for mailcheck. In 2.3.0
for some reason it starts to dislike imap-ssl connections. When such a
thing is present, mailcheck fails to retrieve anything from the server.
Hi,
First of all, sorry for the delay in responding (I have been away from my
machine).
paul beard wrote:
On May 10, 2007, at 2:11 PM, Stefan Bruda wrote:
Somebody wants a python.exe...
make a link to python in the same directory and see what that gets
you. I think that resolves
Ryan Schmidt wrote:
Why wouldn't we want to just update firefox-x11 to 2.0.0.3?
I would personally not mind it. Problem is, the current firefox-x11 does
not work (at least on Intel Macs, it is an issue somebody is working on as
far as I know) and the same goes for 2.0.0.x. SO just updating
Hi,
At 23:24 +0200 on 2007-4-21
Hi,
Apologies for the delayed response.
At 01:01 -0400 on 2007-4-11 Yves de Champlain wrote:
The new fltk does not work for me too well. The fluid issue has
already been noted, and I also note the following problem:
flstring.h:29:28: error: FL/Fl_Export.H: No such file or
Hi,
Andreas Wuest wrote:
Do you have port libidl1 installed? This port seems to conflict with
libidl.
Yes indeed, that (uninstalling libidl1 that is) does it nicely. In the
meantime I also found a bug report in this respect
http://trac.macports.org/projects/macports/ticket/11570. Thanks for
Hi,
At 01:10 -0400 on 2007-4-10 Yves de Champlain wrote:
fltk was in a dire state.
rev 1 should be much better, just commited
The new fltk does not work for me too well. The fluid issue has
already been noted, and I also note the following problem:
flstring.h:29:28: error:
Hi,
The following problem started to pop up recently, though I am not sure
what I did (probably upgraded the outdated packages including some
GNOME ones): ESD launches fine, plays the sounds fine, but during idle
moments it doesn't just sit there, but sits there loading the system
(to 99% or
Hi,
During the normal upgrade I get the following failure for libidl. Any
idea how to fix it? Thanks in advance.
godel:~ port -v upgrade libidl
--- Fetching libidl
--- Verifying checksum(s) for libidl
--- Checksumming libIDL-0.8.8.tar.bz2
--- Extracting libidl
--- Extracting
Hi,
At 18:40 -0500 on 2007-3-24 Ryan Schmidt wrote:
On Mar 24, 2007, at 09:22, Stefan Bruda wrote:
The following problem started to pop up recently, though I am not sure
what I did (probably upgraded the outdated packages including some
GNOME ones): ESD launches fine, plays
Hi,
I am having what I believe to be problems with the jpeg package. They
manifest themselves most notably in FLTK applications (only one realy,
flPhoto) but I also believe that they are the cause of eog crashes.
It goes like this: fltk builds fine as is, but fluid crashes upon
startup and so
Randall Wood wrote:
eog dies quite consistently here, what do you mean by not being able
to reproduce the problem?
eog consistently crashes, but nothing else seems to have this problem.
Oh, I see, sorry for the confusion.
Stefan
If it was so, it might be; and if it were so, it would be;
37 matches
Mail list logo