Scala

2012-03-14 Thread Phil Dobbin
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hi, all. Yesterday I downloaded scala29 after the installer informed me that installing just scala was depreciated to pick a number. However upon successful installation when I issue: `$ scala -version` I get command not found. I tried

Scala

2012-03-14 Thread Phil Dobbin
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hi, all. Yesterday I downloaded scala29 after the installer informed me that installing just scala was depreciated to pick a number. However upon successful installation when I issue: `$ scala -version` I get command not found. I tried

Re: Scala

2012-03-14 Thread Jeremy Lavergne
I get command not found. I tried with the appropriate version number other variations therein but still no luck. What does `port content ...` show? smime.p7s Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature ___ macports-users mailing list

Re: Scala

2012-03-14 Thread Phil Dobbin
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 14/03/2012 16:21, Jeremy Lavergne wrote: I get command not found. I tried with the appropriate version number other variations therein but still no luck. What does `port content ...` show? I've got it: `$ scala-2.9 -version Scala code

Re: Scala

2012-03-14 Thread Dan Ports
On Wed, Mar 14, 2012 at 04:28:36PM +, Phil Dobbin wrote: `$ scala-2.9 -version Scala code runner version 2.9.1.final -- Copyright 2002-2011, LAMP/EPFL` I'll alias scala-2.9 - scala. Sorry for the noise... See also `port select scala`. Dan -- Dan R. K. Ports MIT CSAIL

Re: select portgroup (was: Re: Scala)

2012-03-14 Thread Ryan Schmidt
On Mar 14, 2012, at 15:47, Dan Ports wrote: On Wed, Mar 14, 2012 at 04:28:36PM +, Phil Dobbin wrote: `$ scala-2.9 -version Scala code runner version 2.9.1.final -- Copyright 2002-2011, LAMP/EPFL` I'll alias scala-2.9 - scala. Sorry for the noise... See also `port select scala

Re: select portgroup (was: Re: Scala)

2012-03-14 Thread Dan Ports
On Wed, Mar 14, 2012 at 05:50:51PM -0500, Ryan Schmidt wrote: I'm surprised this isn't part of the select portgroup. Can anyone think of a reason not to move this code there? Sounds like a great idea to me. Dan -- Dan R. K. Ports MIT CSAILhttp://drkp.net/