Wine has to be 32-bit on OS X because of some ABI differences regarding
register reservation in 64-bit. See the following discussion thread on
wine-devel explaining why:
http://www.winehq.org/pipermail/wine-devel/2014-February/103074.html
On Thu, Jul 3, 2014 at 8:04 AM, René J.V. Bertin
On Jul 6, 2014, at 4:31 AM, René J.V. Bertin wrote:
On Saturday July 05 2014 18:30:57 Ryan Schmidt wrote:
No. MacPorts base does not have the capability to depend on a variant of
another port, only to depend on another port. See ticket #126.
The active_variants 1.1 portgroup's
Can someone please help me come up with a setting in the cmake
PortGroup that wouldn't lead to CMake being built as universal (when a
port using the PortGroup would be installed as +universal)?
Mojca
___
macports-users mailing list
Hi,
Can someone please help me come up with a setting in the cmake
PortGroup that wouldn't lead to CMake being built as universal (when a
port using the PortGroup would be installed as +universal)?
`installs_libs no' in the cmake Portfile should already do that.
Furthermore, there's the
On Jul 6, 2014, at 9:27 AM, René J.V. Bertin wrote:
On Sunday July 06 2014 16:01:26 Clemens Lang wrote:
Hi,
Do those work both when installing cmake (as in it wasn't present) and when
it is already installed but one installs an i386 port or a universal port
that require cmake?
Yes
On Sun, Jul 6, 2014 at 4:27 PM, René J.V. wrote:
If one agrees that there is 0 (zero, nil) interest in a universal cmake
variant, you could disallow building one with
universal_variant no
I don't agree with this change. The universal_variant no is there
for ports that are not capable of
On Jul 06, 2014, at 23:56, Mojca Miklavec wrote:
universal_variant no
I don't agree with this change. The universal_variant no is there
for ports that are not capable of being built as universal.
It was just a suggestion, but semantically speaking the expression just
indicates that the
On Jul 3, 2014, at 7:04 AM, René J.V. Bertin wrote:
On Jul 03, 2014, at 13:43, Mojca Miklavec wrote:
On Thu, Jul 3, 2014 at 11:45 AM, René J.V. Bertin wrote:
Quick question: I have the universal cmake variant installed, and I fail to
see the interest of that. Is there any way it could
Quick question: I have the universal cmake variant installed, and I fail to see
the interest of that. Is there any way it could have been installed because
another universal variant's build dependencies?
___
macports-users mailing list
On Thu, Jul 3, 2014 at 11:45 AM, René J.V. Bertin wrote:
Quick question: I have the universal cmake variant installed, and I fail to
see the interest of that. Is there any way it could have been installed
because another universal variant's build dependencies?
That's quite possible.
Maybe
On Jul 03, 2014, at 13:43, Mojca Miklavec wrote:
On Thu, Jul 3, 2014 at 11:45 AM, René J.V. Bertin wrote:
Quick question: I have the universal cmake variant installed, and I fail to
see the interest of that. Is there any way it could have been installed
because another universal variant's
11 matches
Mail list logo
