gcc46 fails to configure

2012-07-02 Thread Rodolfo Aramayo
GCC46 is consistently failing to configure in more than one computer

Log file is attached

Should I file this as a bug?

Thanks

--R


gcc46_main.log
Description: Binary data
___
macports-users mailing list
macports-users@lists.macosforge.org
http://lists.macosforge.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/macports-users


Re: gcc46 fails to configure

2012-07-02 Thread Eric A. Borisch
On Mon, Jul 2, 2012 at 2:38 PM, Rodolfo Aramayo raram...@gmail.com wrote:
 GCC46 is consistently failing to configure in more than one computer

 Log file is attached

 Should I file this as a bug?

It already is: http://trac.macports.org/ticket/35057

It is likely that gcc46 and gcc47 need the same treatment gcc48
received in http://trac.macports.org/changeset/94941.

 -Eric
___
macports-users mailing list
macports-users@lists.macosforge.org
http://lists.macosforge.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/macports-users


Re: gcc46 fails to configure

2012-07-02 Thread Rodolfo Aramayo
Thanks

--R

On Mon, Jul 2, 2012 at 3:15 PM, Eric A. Borisch ebori...@macports.org wrote:
 On Mon, Jul 2, 2012 at 2:38 PM, Rodolfo Aramayo raram...@gmail.com wrote:
 GCC46 is consistently failing to configure in more than one computer

 Log file is attached

 Should I file this as a bug?

 It already is: http://trac.macports.org/ticket/35057

 It is likely that gcc46 and gcc47 need the same treatment gcc48
 received in http://trac.macports.org/changeset/94941.

  -Eric
___
macports-users mailing list
macports-users@lists.macosforge.org
http://lists.macosforge.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/macports-users


Re: gcc46 fails to configure

2012-07-02 Thread Markus W. Weißmann
Thanks for the report!

-Markus

On 2 Jul 2012, at 22:17, Rodolfo Aramayo wrote:

 Thanks
 
 --R
 
 On Mon, Jul 2, 2012 at 3:15 PM, Eric A. Borisch ebori...@macports.org wrote:
 On Mon, Jul 2, 2012 at 2:38 PM, Rodolfo Aramayo raram...@gmail.com wrote:
 GCC46 is consistently failing to configure in more than one computer
 
 Log file is attached
 
 Should I file this as a bug?
 
 It already is: http://trac.macports.org/ticket/35057
 
 It is likely that gcc46 and gcc47 need the same treatment gcc48
 received in http://trac.macports.org/changeset/94941.
 
 -Eric

___
macports-users mailing list
macports-users@lists.macosforge.org
http://lists.macosforge.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/macports-users