port inactive - not really inactive?

2009-11-07 Thread Darren Weber
What's an explanation for this apparent anomaly: $ port echo inactive binutils @2.20_0 g95@0.91_1+darwin_9 gnupg @1.4.10_0 gnutar @1.22_0 hdf5-18@1.8.3_0 hdf5-18

Re: port inactive - not really inactive?

2009-11-07 Thread Joshua Root
On 2009-11-7 10:17, Darren Weber wrote: How is it possible for p5-module-signature to depend on an inactive port? You have to be able to deactivate ports with dependents, or you would never be able to activate a different version... - Josh ___