On Mar 31, 2017, at 16:21, Jan Stary wrote:
> On Mar 31 14:05:03, h...@stare.cz wrote:
>> The speex port has no maintainer so I am asking here.
>> Why do we have both 'speex' and 'speex-devel'?
>> They consist of exactly the same files.
>> Similarly for speexDSP and speexDSP-devel.
>> Xiph.org
Guessing it's legacy cruft. Seems like for deprecated projects, there
should be just a "final release" port with patches added here and there
for compatibility; "devel" is really in my opinion for actively
in-development projects. That's what I do with qt4-mac, which amazingly
still mostly builds
