On Mar 22, 2018, at 18:26, Qianqian Fang wrote:
> I don't know if this si common, but when I tried to install gdb (because my
> lazarus 1.8 complains about missing gdb) using
>
> sudo port install gdb
>
> I got an error when installing the dependency package xz, with the following
> error
>
Dear list,
I don't know if this si common, but when I tried to install gdb (because
my lazarus 1.8 complains about missing gdb) using
|sudo port install gdb|
I got an error when installing the dependency package xz, with the
following error
my port was updated and has the latest version.
Hi,
On Thu, Mar 22, 2018 at 06:59:01PM +, Christopher Jones wrote:
> If it where my choice, I would drop OSX releases < say 10.10… It
> isn’t, and thats fine, but thats just my opinion.
In case you were not aware, that's more or less our policy. We
officially support current - 3, that's 10.10
On 22.03.2018 at 19:59 Christopher Jones wrote:
> Lets leave this here, as we aren’t going to agree on this it seems.
It has never been my aim to make you agree with me. I was just trying to make
it a little more plausible why some people might still want to stick with
outdated
software ;-)
--
Hi
> On 22 Mar 2018, at 5:21 pm, Andreas Falkenhahn wrote:
>
> On 20.03.2018 at 23:59 Chris Jones wrote:
>
>> You can call these OSes ‘retro’ if you want, to make it sound good,
>> but all they really are, are outdated and insecure.
>
> By the way, another reason to use "outdated and insecure"
On 20.03.2018 at 23:59 Chris Jones wrote:
> You can call these OSes ‘retro’ if you want, to make it sound good,
> but all they really are, are outdated and insecure.
By the way, another reason to use "outdated and insecure" operating
systems from a programmer's point of view is backwards compatib
