Re: platforms

On Mar 24, 2018, at 08:14, Mojca Miklavec wrote: >> I propose that the 'platforms' field be no longer required >> if it is ignored, and if it stays, let it be a free form text, >> as opposed to a predefined definitive list of all unixes. > > We'll need it to specify which darwin versions are

Re: LibreSSL 2.7.1 Released

On Mar 24, 2018, at 04:49, Jan Stary wrote: > what is the plan really with libressl and libressl-devel? > We have 2.5.5 in security/libressl, 2.6.2 in security/libressl-devel, > and now 2.7.1 is out. > > I would just prepare an udate of libressl to 2.7.1, > but I want to as kfirst: why do we

Re: How to resolve libstdc++.6.dylib dependency

On Mar 24, 2018, at 07:35, Andreas Falkenhahn wrote: > When I compile my C++11 project on a 10.5 PPC system using gcc6 and try to > run it on another 10.5 PPC system that doesn't have gcc6 installed, I get an > error that a symbol cannot be imported from /usr/lib/libstdc++.6.dylib. I > guess

Re: How to resolve libstdc++.6.dylib dependency

On 24.03.2018 at 17:34 Mojca Miklavec wrote: > Sorry about the wrong advice about stdlib. No worries, I've had another idea. I can just link statically against libgcc and libstdc++, like so: -static-libgcc -static-libstdc++ This increases the executable size by about 1 MB but the resulting

Re: How to resolve libstdc++.6.dylib dependency

On 24 March 2018 at 16:40, Andreas Falkenhahn wrote: > On 24.03.2018 at 16:07 Ken Cunningham wrote: > >> Cameron Kaiser builds and distributes TenFourFox which is a c++11 >> app built with gcc48 against a new libstdc++. >> He has worked a lot of this out. >> His instructions are here >>

Re: How to resolve libstdc++.6.dylib dependency

On 24.03.2018 at 14:07 Mojca Miklavec wrote: > On 24 March 2018 at 13:35, Andreas Falkenhahn wrote: >> When I compile my C++11 project on a 10.5 PPC system using gcc6 and try to >> run it on another 10.5 PPC system that doesn't have gcc6 installed, I get an >> error that a symbol cannot be

Re: LibreSSL 2.7.1 Released

see > On Mar 24, 2018, at 03:49, Jan Stary wrote: > > Hi Jeremy, > > what is the plan really with libressl and libressl-devel? > We have 2.5.5 in security/libressl, 2.6.2 in security/libressl-devel, > and now 2.7.1 is out. > >

Re: How to resolve libstdc++.6.dylib dependency

Cameron Kaiser builds and distributes TenFourFox which is a c++11 app built with gcc48 against a new libstdc++. He has worked a lot of this out. His instructions are here , and there's a script in the

Re: platforms

On 24 March 2018 at 13:54, Jan Starý wrote: > The 'platforms' field of a Portfile is currently > both _required_ and _ignored_. By the Guide, > > A list of the platforms on which the port has been tested. > Required, but not interpreted in any way by the software > at this

Re: How to resolve libstdc++.6.dylib dependency

On 24 March 2018 at 13:35, Andreas Falkenhahn wrote: > When I compile my C++11 project on a 10.5 PPC system using gcc6 and try to > run it on another 10.5 PPC system that doesn't have gcc6 installed, I get an > error that a symbol cannot be imported from /usr/lib/libstdc++.6.dylib. I > guess

Re: How to resolve libstdc++.6.dylib dependency

I don’t know much about these libraries but there exists a libstdc++.a library. No idea if it is different in content from the .6 one but if not, you could do a static link so that you don’t need any library for the users to run your program. Not sure it helps. The other solution is to try to

platforms

The 'platforms' field of a Portfile is currently both _required_ and _ignored_. By the Guide, A list of the platforms on which the port has been tested. Required, but not interpreted in any way by the software at this time; it is purely informational for users. Also, it

How to resolve libstdc++.6.dylib dependency

When I compile my C++11 project on a 10.5 PPC system using gcc6 and try to run it on another 10.5 PPC system that doesn't have gcc6 installed, I get an error that a symbol cannot be imported from /usr/lib/libstdc++.6.dylib. I guess this is because the libstdc++.6.dylib that is shipped with 10.5

Re: LibreSSL 2.7.1 Released

Hi Jeremy, what is the plan really with libressl and libressl-devel? We have 2.5.5 in security/libressl, 2.6.2 in security/libressl-devel, and now 2.7.1 is out. I would just prepare an udate of libressl to 2.7.1, but I want to as kfirst: why do we have "devel". LibreSSL themselves make no such