Re: Was the clang <> GCC 5 ABI incompatibility overcome at some point?

Thanks a lot, Ken. Yes, I understand that, but I believe there was some ABI incompatibility introduced with GCC 5, wasn't it? If I recall correctly, it wasn't just a matter of what C++ standard library you choose, but that even if you chose the same, GCC 5 still broke the ABI compatibility. At the

Re: Was the clang <> GCC 5 ABI incompatibility overcome at some point?

> Hi! > > I remember a few years ago when a change in GCC 5 caused ABI > incompatibility with clang. I'm searching for updates on this, and it seems > like clang applied the same change eventually, but can they considered > binary compatible at this moment? Is it now safe to link object code

Was the clang <> GCC 5 ABI incompatibility overcome at some point?

Hi! I remember a few years ago when a change in GCC 5 caused ABI incompatibility with clang. I'm searching for updates on this, and it seems like clang applied the same change eventually, but can they considered binary compatible at this moment? Is it now safe to link object code coming from GCC