Re: What happens when a port fails to compile (+universal) and there is no maintainer?

I tried to build jemalloc without +universal on my M1 Mac on Big Sur and did not encounter any errors. When I tried to build it with +universal, I saw the same error as in the log file attached to the trac case. The clang messages suggest that an express cast will solve the compile problem:

Re: What happens when a port fails to compile (+universal) and there is no maintainer?

it builds OK universal on Monterey Intel: % port -v installed jemalloc The following ports are currently installed: jemalloc @5.3.0_2+universal (active) requested_variants='+universal' platform='darwin 21' archs='arm64 x86_64' date='2022-08-22T17:31:05-0700’ There are many combinations and

Re: ffmpeg 4.4.2 fails to build

> On Aug 21, 2022, at 5:17 AM, Christopher Nielsen > wrote: > > This has been fixed. Wait at least two hours, then run a selfupdate, followed > by an upgrade. Thank you Chris and Ryan! -Terry

Re: jemalloc +universal

On Aug 22, 2022, at 1:31 PM, Bill Cole wrote: > On 2022-08-22 at 10:26:14 UTC-0400 (Mon, 22 Aug 2022 15:26:14 +0100) >> The auto build build either an arm64 or an x86_64, so seems like no one >> would ever know if a +universal build fails. > > It's unclear to me why anyone would need a

Re: What happens when a port fails to compile (+universal) and there is no maintainer?

On 2022-08-22 at 10:26:14 UTC-0400 (Mon, 22 Aug 2022 15:26:14 +0100) Philip Potter is rumored to have said: Hi, What happens when a port fails to compile (+universal) and there is no maintainer? The failure remains until someone with the right combination of skill and motivation fixes it.

What happens when a port fails to compile (+universal) and there is no maintainer?

Hi, What happens when a port fails to compile (+universal) and there is no maintainer? ie jemalloc? The auto build build either an arm64 or an x86_64, so seems like no one would ever know if a +universal build fails. How or who resolves