Re: list of packages that are always compiled

2023-01-08 Thread Werner LEMBERG
Sorry for the late reply; only yesterday I had access again to my Mac. >> is there an option to `port` that shows me the names of all packages >> that must be built from source, and which are not available >> pre-compiled from 'packages.macports.org'? [...] > > List which ports do and don't

Re: list of packages that are always compiled

2022-12-26 Thread Joshua Root
Richard L. Hamilton wrote: A plausible test case with the first of those (ffmpeg +nonfree) gave the expected result: return code 1, i.e. non-redistributable; and without the +nonfree variant, also gave the expected result of return code 0 (redistributable). That nicely shows that the results

Re: list of packages that are always compiled

2022-12-26 Thread Richard L. Hamilton
> On Dec 26, 2022, at 8:43 AM, Joshua Root wrote: > > https://github.com/macports/macports-infrastructure/blob/master/jobs/port_binary_distributable.tcl > > > List which ports are and aren't

Re: list of packages that are always compiled

2022-12-26 Thread Joshua Root
Werner LEMBERG wrote: Folks, is there an option to `port` that shows me the names of all packages that must be built from source, and which are not available pre-compiled from 'packages.macports.org'? Or maybe this list is somewhere else, ideally also giving a reason? [My use-case is

Re: list of packages that are always compiled

2022-12-25 Thread Richard L. Hamilton
There are license and license_noconflict lines in Portfiles; if a port and what it depends on (including include files, no pun intended) are incompatible (I suppose assumed if they are different unless a license_noconflict line in one (both?) Portfile says it’s ok), then that port cannot be

list of packages that are always compiled

2022-12-24 Thread Werner LEMBERG
Folks, is there an option to `port` that shows me the names of all packages that must be built from source, and which are not available pre-compiled from 'packages.macports.org'? Or maybe this list is somewhere else, ideally also giving a reason? [My use-case is 'ghostscript', for which I