On Dec 31, 2019, at 09:37, Daniel J. Luke wrote:
> On Dec 31, 2019, at 10:34 AM, Ken Cunningham wrote:
>> On 2019-12-31, at 7:26 AM, Daniel J. Luke wrote:
Except that would get the rdeps of openal-soft with its default variants,
rather than with the +gui and +tests variants.
On Dec 31, 2019, at 10:34 AM, Ken Cunningham
wrote:
> On 2019-12-31, at 7:26 AM, Daniel J. Luke wrote:
>>>
>>> Except that would get the rdeps of openal-soft with its default variants,
>>> rather than with the +gui and +tests variants.
>>
>> That's what I understood Ken was trying to do.
>
>
On 2019-12-31, at 7:26 AM, Daniel J. Luke wrote:
>>
>> Except that would get the rdeps of openal-soft with its default variants,
>> rather than with the +gui and +tests variants.
>
> That's what I understood Ken was trying to do.
I think Ryan means that if the "test" variant of openal-soft
On Dec 31, 2019, at 12:59 AM, Ryan Schmidt wrote:
>> you could probably do something like port install rdepof:openal-soft && port
>> install openal-soft +gui +tests
>
> Except that would get the rdeps of openal-soft with its default variants,
> rather than with the +gui and +tests variants.
