Building "poppler" failed

2024-03-10 Thread Dave Horsfall
High Sierra 10.13.6 on ancient MBP. Doing my weekly "port upgrade outdated", it went belly-up here: - ---> Building poppler Error: Failed to build poppler: command execution failed Error: See

Re: MacPorts vs. Apple compiler issues, Handle

2024-03-10 Thread Riccardo Mottola via macports-users
Hi Joshua, Joshua Root wrote: MacPort installs: $ clang-mp-9.0 --version clang version 9.0.1 Apple: $ clang --version Apple LLVM version 9.1.0 (clang-902.0.39.1) Is there some Apple "trick" or is it the slight compiler difference in version? The version difference is less slight than you

Re: mozjs102

2024-03-10 Thread Dave Allured - NOAA Affiliate via macports-users
Following Ryan's suggestion, I am working on an update which should remove the mozjs102 dependency, and enable gjs and glade for Sonoma. Please try the portfile from PR https://github.com/macports/macports-ports/pull/22974 . On Thu, Mar 7, 2024 at 5:22 PM Lukas Oberhuber wrote: > i was never

Re: mozjs102

2024-03-10 Thread Dave Allured - NOAA Affiliate via macports-users
On Thu, Mar 7, 2024 at 5:22 PM Lukas Oberhuber wrote: > i was never able to get gjs to work (at least when included in GIMP. It > did compile, at least when I last tried (which was at least a year ago). > > On Thu, 7 Mar 2024 at 12:23, Ryan Schmidt wrote: > >> On Mar 6, 2024, at 06:13, Gregory

Re: MacPorts vs. Apple compiler issues, Handle

2024-03-10 Thread Joshua Root
MacPort installs: $ clang-mp-9.0 --version clang version 9.0.1 Apple: $ clang --version Apple LLVM version 9.1.0 (clang-902.0.39.1) Is there some Apple "trick" or is it the slight compiler difference in version? The version difference is less slight than you might think. Apple clang version

MacPorts vs. Apple compiler issues, Handle

2024-03-10 Thread Riccardo Mottola via macports-users
Hi! I am wondering about differences between Apple clang and MacPorts clang. I tried to compile ArcticFox on 10.13, but in back compiatibility (10.9 target on 10.11 SDK got through MacPorts) Using exactly the same configuration options, MacPort clang 9.0 fails with: 169:29.18

Re: I just wanted to upgrade my older MacPorts version

2024-03-10 Thread Riccardo Mottola via macports-users
Hi, xmar...@iqf.csic.es wrote: The “sudo port upgrade outdated” is running, but the question know is, how can I run in the future the equivalent to the older “sudo port selfupdate”? I suppose that since you got the repository in git, you just need to do a "git pull" to upgrade it and