Re: stdlib.h compilation error for macports gcc9.

2021-02-07 Thread Chris Jones
e0fe9cd9377caa0fee122dd387a >>> In file included from >>> /opt/local/include/gcc9/c++/ext/string_conversions.h:41, >>> from /opt/local/include/gcc9/c++/bits/basic_string.h:6493, >>> from /opt/local/include/gcc9/c++/string

Re: stdlib.h compilation error for macports gcc9.

2021-02-07 Thread Chris Jones
It sounds like your builds are not correctly specifying the SDK gcc is to use. There are a number of ways you can do this, either by pass it via a compiler flag, by running the complication through xcrun, or by setting the SDKROOT variables to the required path. Cheers Chris > On 7 Feb

Re: restore_ports.tcl failure

2020-12-18 Thread Chris Jones
Have you checked to see if the ports you are trying to restore are available for arm64 ? Its highly likely that either some are just not available at this time, or if they are they might require different variants to that you previously used. I am not surprised just blindly running the restore

AnRe: latest update to BigSur 11.1 broke gcc

2020-12-16 Thread Chris Jones
I tried it myself, and switching to --with-build-sysroot with gcc10 on big sur does seem to build. I haven't had time to run any tests to see exactly what this means w.r.t. the default sdk search paths. But in any case I think the best advice is anyway to explicitly set it yourself, using one

Re: CLI Tool Problem

2020-12-10 Thread Chris Jones
Have you tried doing what it asks ? > On 9 Dec 2020, at 11:32 pm, Tom wrote: > >  > Hi, > > I get the following Error Message, although Xcode 12 and the CLI Tools are > installed: > >>> Warning: The macOS 11.0 SDK does not appear to be installed. Ports may not >>> build correctly. >>>

Re: Command Line Tools for Xcode 11.6

2020-08-01 Thread Chris Jones
Hi, Either install the newest available, 11.5, or just remove the CLT (its not really needed). https://developer.apple.com/library/archive/technotes/tn2339/_index.html#//apple_ref/doc/uid/DTS40014588-CH1-HOW_CAN_I_UNINSTALL_THE_COMMAND_LINE_TOOLS_ Chris > On 1 Aug 2020, at 5:59 pm, Murray

Re: Building emacs-27 from source with AppKit, X windows, Gtk+ toolkit support...?

2020-06-03 Thread Chris Jones
> On 3 Jun 2020, at 9:10 pm, Ryan Schmidt wrote: > >  > >> On Jun 3, 2020, at 05:38, Carlo Tambuatco wrote: >> >> I’m attempting to build emacs-27 from source and I would like to have AppKit >> support for running natively on macOS and Gtk3 support. >> >> These are the gtk3 libraries

Re: Python 3.8.2 - Macports configuration problem

2020-04-28 Thread Chris Jones
> On 29 Apr 2020, at 1:45 am, Max Anglad wrote: > > I forgot to say that after Macports python38 installation, following the > notes, I made : > >> sudo port select --set python3 python38 > Selecting 'python38' for 'python3' succeeded. 'python38' is now active. > > But however I think the

Re: ncurses 6.2 failing with reinplace warnings

2020-03-15 Thread Chris Jones
> On 15 Mar 2020, at 11:26 pm, Richard DeLaurell > wrote: > >  > Hello, > > I am trying to update from ncurses 6.1 to 6.2, but am getting the warnings > noted in ticket #60152; however, unlike the ticket report there my > installation does not complete. > > The failure log reports:

Re: When os10 versions are skipped

2020-03-03 Thread Chris Jones
> On 3 Mar 2020, at 6:20 pm, dan d. wrote: > >  > Hello, > > I may in the near future install a newer os10 which skips some versions. > > How short of uninstalling the current macports can this be done? You cannot. With Any major OS upgrade you must follow the migration instructions,

Re: Why does llvm depend on python 2.7?

2020-02-05 Thread Chris Jones
as it was before, with or without MacPorts python being used. The MR really just removes the python27 dep. when it is not actually used. Chris On 05/02/2020 2:40 pm, Chris Jones wrote: Hi, Just to try and be clear. The current inconsistency in the port files is the fact the clang-X builds are configured

Re: Why does llvm depend on python 2.7?

2020-02-05 Thread Chris Jones
< 11, as seems to be the current intention, or for all OSes, is really a separate question. Chris On 05/02/2020 2:33 pm, Chris Jones wrote: Hi, On 05/02/2020 2:18 pm, Ken Cunningham wrote: doing that doesn't really take us in the right directiion, though chris. reproducible builds and all that.

Re: Why does llvm depend on python 2.7?

2020-02-05 Thread Chris Jones
Hi, On 05/02/2020 2:18 pm, Ken Cunningham wrote: doing that doesn't really take us in the right directiion, though chris. reproducible builds and all that. we go from a fully spec'd proper python Actually no. That is not what happens at the moment. Check the clang-9.0 config on darwin 11+

Re: Why does llvm depend on python 2.7?

2020-02-05 Thread Chris Jones
Hi, Indeed thanks, I had found my way to that link already ;) I think has far as Macports goes, we can fix this by just removing the python dep. entirely for darwin >= 11. Its only needed on the older OSes where the system python is not new enough. I have the changes to do this almost ready,

Re: Why does qt5-qttools depends on clang 9?

2020-02-05 Thread Chris Jones
ink the python dep. can be removed for the majority of (not ancient) systems. cheers Chris On 05/02/2020 11:07 am, Chris Jones wrote: Another question is why does clang depend explicitly on python 2.7, can it not be updated to a newer 3.x version ? On 05/02/2020 7:34 am, Vincent Habchi wrote:

Re: Why does qt5-qttools depends on clang 9?

2020-02-05 Thread Chris Jones
On 05/02/2020 7:34 am, Vincent Habchi wrote: Hi there, everything is in the subject. Is there any reason for this dependency? I’m trying to get rid of python 2.7, and the only dependent port left so far is clang 9.0, which is needed by qt5-qttools, but I can’t figure out why. Isn't the

Re: Why does qt5-qttools depends on clang 9?

2020-02-05 Thread Chris Jones
Another question is why does clang depend explicitly on python 2.7, can it not be updated to a newer 3.x version ? On 05/02/2020 7:34 am, Vincent Habchi wrote: Hi there, everything is in the subject. Is there any reason for this dependency? I’m trying to get rid of python 2.7, and the

Re: ports directory (from git fork) up to date, still a warning

2020-01-29 Thread Chris Jones
OK. Done that. What does the error mean? I am in a local git branch at the moment (not in master), is that the problem? Yes. Just do what it says, define the remote branch to use. e.g. git branch --set-upstream-to=origin/master minio-20200128 bash-3.2# port -v sync --->  Updating the

Re: Migrating from Sierra on one box to High Sierra on another

2020-01-21 Thread Chris Jones
As with any OS upgrade, follow the instructions at https://trac.macports.org/wiki/Migration On 21/01/2020 1:28 am, Dave Horsfall wrote: I don't have web access right now, hence the list... My ancient Sierra MacBook failed (graphics board which is no longer available) but I have been

Re: upgrade to osx 10.15 catalina

2020-01-09 Thread Chris Jones
Hi, I would say the situation with 10.15 is now similar to other OSes. Some things work, some things do not. There are also some clear cases of things not working, and cannot/willnot be fixed, such as 32 bit support. At the end of the day though only you know which ports you really care

Re: problem migrating to catalina

2019-11-28 Thread Chris Jones
> On 28 Nov 2019, at 3:39 pm, Comer Duncan wrote: > > I've migrated to catalina and am having problem with building pango. > I've attached an edited version of the main.log, as the whole file was > deemed too big. Please take a look and let me know what you think. > Thanks very much! You

Re: help with installing xorg-server from MacPorts and installing Inkscape

2019-11-27 Thread Chris Jones
assuming I should setup X11 as the default server? Yes, just do exactly what it says... > > Thanks! > >> On Wed, Nov 27, 2019 at 4:55 AM Chris Jones wrote: >> Hi, >> >> So what exactly have you run ? >> >> Please run >> >> sudo port install

Re: help with installing xorg-server from MacPorts and installing Inkscape

2019-11-27 Thread Chris Jones
Hi, So what exactly have you run ? Please run sudo port install xorg-server in a terminal, and if you still have problems post *exactly* what the above gives. Chris On 27/11/2019 4:09 am, yiming roberts-lo wrote: Hello, I'm trying to figure out how to install Inkscape. I tried to follow

Re: XCode 11 on Mojave problem, again

2019-11-09 Thread Chris Jones
> On 9 Nov 2019, at 1:50 pm, Henning Hraban Ramm wrote: > > Hi, > I also had problems on Mojave, since at least cctools was expecting a > MacOSX10.14.sdk in > /Applications/Xcode.app/Contents/Developer/Platforms/MacOSX.platform/Developer/SDKs; > on Mojave there’s only the 10.15 SDK. > I

Re: mysql57, boost and postgresql84

2019-11-08 Thread Chris Jones
> On 9 Nov 2019, at 1:39 am, Ryan Schmidt wrote: > >  > >> On Nov 8, 2019, at 16:06, Michael Newman wrote: >> >>> On Nov 7, 2019, at 06:34, Ryan Schmidt wrote: >>> >>> If `port installed requested` shows things that you don't actually want, >>> tell MacPorts by marking them as not

Re: mysql57, boost and postgresql84

2019-11-06 Thread Chris Jones
Hi, On 06/11/2019 8:34 am, Michael Newman via macports-users wrote: I have no idea why I have postgreSQL: MrMuscle:~ mnewman$ sudo port dependents postgresql84 postgresql84-server depends on postgresql84 MrMuscle:~ mnewman$ sudo port dependents postgresql84-server postgresql84-server has no

Re: failure to get gcc9 running

2019-11-05 Thread Chris Jones
On 05/11/2019 12:28 pm, Hans Goedbloed wrote: Hi Peter, Ryan and Chris Thanks for your help. Reply to Chris Jones: -- I am not sure that I removed all ports, how can I find out? -- How do I create an empty vanilla MacPorts installation? By 'port -u uninstall'? To Ryan Schmidt: -- (1

Re: failure to get gcc9 running

2019-11-05 Thread Chris Jones
Hi, On 05/11/2019 12:28 pm, Hans Goedbloed wrote: Hi Peter, Ryan and Chris Thanks for your help. Reply to Chris Jones: -- I am not sure that I removed all ports, how can I find out? -- How do I create an empty vanilla MacPorts installation? By 'port -u uninstall'? Follow <ht

Re: Freecad ports ends in error

2019-10-28 Thread Chris Jones
Hi, Please follow the procedure at https://guide.macports.org/#project.tickets first see if there is an open bug report, and if there is contribute to that. Otherwise, open a new one. cheers Chris On 28/10/2019 10:51 am, Christoph Kukulies wrote: I was trying to build FreeCAD under

Re: executing gcc9 on macOS 10.14

2019-10-23 Thread Chris Jones
No problem, always glad to help someone use MacPorts ! On 23/10/2019 10:38 am, Hans Goedbloed wrote: Thanks!, I now know what to expect and how to fix it. Hans From: macports-users on behalf of Chris Jones Sent: Wednesday, October 23, 2019 11:30 AM

Re: executing gcc9 on macOS 10.14

2019-10-23 Thread Chris Jones
4 @3_1+ld64_xcode (active)" Any other suggestions? Hans From: macports-users on behalf of Chris Jones Sent: Wednesday, October 23, 2019 10:27 AM To: macports-users@lists.macports.org Subject: Re: executing gcc9 on macOS 10.14 Hi, One other comment.

Re: executing gcc9 on macOS 10.14

2019-10-23 Thread Chris Jones
use) set export SDKROOT=`xcrun --show-sdk-path` I actually had set the above in my shell profile, so I always have it, which is why gfortran worked for me 'out the box' (and thus I forgot it was there, which was my original intention) Chris On 22/10/2019 6:09 pm, Chris Jones wrote: Hi,

Re: executing gcc9 on macOS 10.14

2019-10-23 Thread Chris Jones
; sudo port -f uninstall ld64 > sudo port install ld64 Chris On 23/10/2019 9:21 am, Chris Jones wrote: Hi, ( Please always reply to the list ) The error below looks like one we addressed recently. Have you updated your ports ? Please run > sudo port sync > sudo port upgrade out

Re: executing gcc9 on macOS 10.14

2019-10-23 Thread Chris Jones
ommand are there, except /usr/lib/libSystem.B.dylib. Could that be the problem? Hans From: macports-users on behalf of Chris Jones Sent: Tuesday, October 22, 2019 7:09 PM To: macports-users@lists.macports.org Subject: Re: executing gcc9 on macOS 10.14 Hi, Y

Re: executing gcc9 on macOS 10.14

2019-10-22 Thread Chris Jones
Hi, Your ld command is incomplete. You aren't passing any of the runtime libraries needed to link the .o file into an executable. The simplest approach is to let gcc do the full job. Titan ~/Documents/Code > cat test.f program hello print *, "Hello World!" end program

Re: mpv, ffmpeg seg fault in macOS catalina

2019-10-18 Thread Chris Jones
> On 18 Oct 2019, at 11:30 pm, Michael Newman via macports-users > wrote: > > I’m sorry, but I don’t understand most of what was written in this thread, > but I do have a simple question: > > If I upgrade to Catalina (I already have Xcode 11.1) and install MacPorts for > Catalina will

Re: mpv, ffmpeg seg fault in macOS catalina

2019-10-18 Thread Chris Jones
Hi, Workaround is to either blacklist the compiler which has this option turned on by default (which is what Chris replied) or in fact use a flag to disable this. But disabling this flag is not needed for non-broken compilers, so it's probably better to just blacklist the compiler, and the

Re: llvm versions on 10.5 3.9->8.0

2019-10-18 Thread Chris Jones
Hi, On 18/10/2019 7:00 am, Riccardo Mottola via macports-users wrote: Hi, when running upgrade of llvm 3.9, I get this message: $ sudo port -v upgrade llvm-3.9 --->  llvm-3.9 is replaced by llvm-8.0 is this correct? I think that for now the different clang versions would "stay" and so

Re: libSystem not found using gfortran

2019-10-16 Thread Chris Jones
--->  Building libgcc9 Error: Failed to build libgcc9: command execution failed Error: See /opt/local/var/macports/logs/_opt_local_var_macports_sources_rsync.macports.org_macports_release_tarballs_ports_lang_gcc9/libgcc9/main.log for details. Error: Follow

Re: Xorg-server problems

2019-10-15 Thread Chris Jones
Hi, So, first things first. Have you followed the instructions to log out then in again ? This is required to get xorg-server working. Then, please remove your custom xinitrc etc. and confirm a default configuration works as expected. I usually use something like xclock for this, to check

Re: libSystem not found using gfortran

2019-10-15 Thread Chris Jones
gt;> which the buildbots use. >> >>> On 11/10/2019 2:56 pm, Richard L. Hamilton wrote: >>> Is Xcode 11.1 still a bad idea on Mojave? >>> >>>> On Oct 11, 2019, at 09:40, Chris Jones wrote: >>>> >>>> >>>>&g

Re: alternative for g95 on macOS Mojave

2019-10-14 Thread Chris Jones
On 14/10/2019 4:02 pm, Chris Jones wrote: On 14/10/2019 3:54 pm, Hans Goedbloed wrote: I have been using g95 for many years on my iMac to perform fortran 77 calculations, but upgrading to macOS10.14 (Mojave) I found that “building g95 is not supported with Xcode 9 or greater”. Which

Re: alternative for g95 on macOS Mojave

2019-10-14 Thread Chris Jones
On 14/10/2019 3:54 pm, Hans Goedbloed wrote: I have been using g95 for many years on my iMac to perform fortran 77 calculations, but upgrading to macOS10.14 (Mojave) I found that “building g95 is not supported with Xcode 9 or greater”. Which package should I use instead?​ gfotran, as

Re: Xfce4 Won't Launch in macOS Catalina

2019-10-12 Thread Chris Jones
Hi, I am not sure you have provided enough information for anyone to really be able to help. Most likely some command that previously worked is now failing to run, and you need to first figure out what that is. Are there any crash reports, in Console, that might help ? Have you checked to see

Re: MacPorts activation relating to bsdtar

2019-10-12 Thread Chris Jones
> On 12 Oct 2019, at 3:26 am, Ryan Schmidt wrote: > >  > >> On Oct 11, 2019, at 10:49, Steven Esser wrote: >> >> On a fresh Catalina (10.15) install with Xcode 11.1 and the latest CLI tools >> I cannot seem to activate any ports. Most seem to configure and build >> correctly, but fail

Re: Xcode 11 on Mojave

2019-10-12 Thread Chris Jones
> On 12 Oct 2019, at 3:28 am, Ryan Schmidt wrote: > > On Oct 11, 2019, at 09:57, Joshua Root wrote: > >> Xcode itself only contains a 10.15 SDK, but the Command Line Tools have >> a 10.14 one. You should be mostly fine with them installed, though there >> are some exceptions. Our

Re: libSystem not found using gfortran

2019-10-11 Thread Chris Jones
yes, as it only has the 10.15 SDK, different to the 10.14 one Xcode 10 has, which the buildbots use. On 11/10/2019 2:56 pm, Richard L. Hamilton wrote: Is Xcode 11.1 still a bad idea on Mojave? On Oct 11, 2019, at 09:40, Chris Jones wrote: This is what I did supposingly

Re: libSystem not found using gfortran

2019-10-11 Thread Chris Jones
This is what I did supposingly but with xcode11.0... but anyway, I will try again with the new xcode. I will maintain you informed... it happened to other people in the office so if I solve this many people will be happy ;o) Once Xcode is updated to 11.1 please also run xcode-select

Re: libSystem not found using gfortran

2019-10-11 Thread Chris Jones
for -lSystem collect2: error: ld returned 1 exit status one more request. please post the full output from compiling your test code with the -v option. cheers Chris On 11/10/2019 12:59 pm, Chris Jones wrote: can you please direct us to the exact test application code you are using

Re: libSystem not found using gfortran

2019-10-11 Thread Chris Jones
  /opt/local/lib/gcc9 Framework search paths: ld: library not found for -lSystem collect2: error: ld returned 1 exit status one more request. please post the full output from compiling your test code with the -v option. cheers Chris On 11/10/2019 12:59 pm, Chris Jones wrote: can you ple

Re: libSystem not found using gfortran

2019-10-11 Thread Chris Jones
: error: ld returned 1 exit status one more request. please post the full output from compiling your test code with the -v option. cheers Chris On 11/10/2019 12:59 pm, Chris Jones wrote: can you please direct us to the exact test application code you are using ? Also, can you confirm

Re: libSystem not found using gfortran

2019-10-11 Thread Chris Jones
not found for -lSystem collect2: error: ld returned 1 exit status one more request. please post the full output from compiling your test code with the -v option. cheers Chris On 11/10/2019 12:59 pm, Chris Jones wrote: can you please direct us to the exact test application code you are using

Re: libSystem not found using gfortran

2019-10-11 Thread Chris Jones
on 1.0.0, current version 1.0.0) /opt/local/lib/libgcc/libquadmath.0.dylib (compatibility version 1.0.0, current version 1.0.0) Oberon ~/cernbox/MacPorts > On 11/10/2019 1:02 pm, Chris Jones wrote: one more request. please post the full output from compiling your test code with the -

Re: libSystem not found using gfortran

2019-10-11 Thread Chris Jones
one more request. please post the full output from compiling your test code with the -v option. cheers Chris On 11/10/2019 12:59 pm, Chris Jones wrote: can you please direct us to the exact test application code you are using ? Also, can you confirm the exact Xcode version you are using

Re: libSystem not found using gfortran

2019-10-11 Thread Chris Jones
can you please direct us to the exact test application code you are using ? Also, can you confirm the exact Xcode version you are using ? Have you correctly followed the macports migration guide after updating your OS ? https://trac.macports.org/wiki/Migration cheers Chris On 11/10/2019

Re: MacPorts compatible with macOS 10.15 Catalina

2019-10-08 Thread Chris Jones
On 08/10/2019 9:05 am, Peter Hohmann via macports-users wrote: So just reinstall even though there is no 10.15 version and using the 10.14 version instead? No. Until a binary installer specific for 10.15 is available, you need to install macports from source.

Re: MacPorts compatible with macOS 10.15 Catalina

2019-10-08 Thread Chris Jones
The solution is in the error below... Follow the guidelines at https://trac.macports.org/wiki/Migration When reinstalling macports, as there is currently no binary installer you will have to follow the install from source option. https://www.macports.org/install.php Chris On 08/10/2019

Re: snowleopardfixes is obsolete; please uninstall it.

2019-10-06 Thread Chris Jones
Hi, You must have not upgraded that machine for a very very long time, as snowleopardfixes was replaced some time ago now. Not upgrading machines for extended periods can lead to problems when you do, and is not advised. In this case do what it says below. Uninstall the port and try again.

Re: Xcode and gcc conflict: resolved soon?

2019-10-04 Thread Chris Jones
Hi, Please always provide the exact error messages when reporting problems, otherwise it is difficult to know exactly what you are referring. There are a number of different issues at the moment w.r.t. Xcode 11. That said, its probably not possible at this point to give you a timescale when

Re: py36-pyqt5 Failed to determine details of Qt installation.

2019-10-02 Thread Chris Jones
We are discovering, due to the Xcode 11 upgrade, just how many places in MacPorts the path to the 10.14 SDK got baked into files where we didn't mean for it to be. There are many other mailing list threads and tickets being filed with us about this. Until this is all ironed out, your

Re: Failed to install libgcc9: no destroot found

2019-09-27 Thread Chris Jones
of action is to reinstall the OS, Xcode and then > MacPorts. > > Thank you all for your suggestions. > Vahid > >> On Sep 27, 2019, at 6:28 PM, Bill Cole >> wrote: >> >> On 27 Sep 2019, at 16:51, Chris Jones wrote: >> >>>>> On 27 Sep 20

Re: Failed to install libgcc9: no destroot found

2019-09-27 Thread Chris Jones
> On 27 Sep 2019, at 10:29 pm, Bill Cole > wrote: > > On 27 Sep 2019, at 16:51, Chris Jones wrote: > >>>> On 27 Sep 2019, at 9:28 pm, Vahid Askarpour wrote: >>> >>> When I upgraded to Majove and installed Xcode 11.1, I ended up with >

Re: Failed to install libgcc9: no destroot found

2019-09-27 Thread Chris Jones
all. MacOS does not ship gcc, and MacPorts would never anything under /usr/ Something is distinctly messed up with your system I suspect... > > Vahid > >> On Sep 27, 2019, at 3:58 PM, Chris Jones wrote: >> >> Hi, >> >> Sounds like your ports database is

Re: Failed to install libgcc9: no destroot found

2019-09-27 Thread Chris Jones
Hi, Sounds like your ports database is corrupted in some way, it is is complaining about a file and port that is not actually installed > On 27 Sep 2019, at 4:37 pm, Vahid Askarpour wrote: > > I have /opt/local/lib folder but there is no libgcc subfolder there. > > Vahid > >> On Sep

Re: py36-pyqt5 Failed to determine details of Qt installation.

2019-09-27 Thread Chris Jones
' being superseded by SDK with 'macosx10.15'. 10.15 Is this a problem? On Fri, Sep 27, 2019 at 7:26 AM Chris Jones <mailto:jon...@hep.phy.cam.ac.uk>> wrote: > I'm at my wits end with this. Is there some problem with the py36-pyqt5 > port finding the > correc

Re: py36-pyqt5 Failed to determine details of Qt installation.

2019-09-27 Thread Chris Jones
I'm at my wits end with this. Is there some problem with the py36-pyqt5 port finding the correct sdk? I have no idea, but if I where you I would simplify things by first working out why xcrun --show-sdk-path is not giving you the versioned SDK path. My bet is whatever the port is doing

Re: py36-pyqt5 Failed to determine details of Qt installation.

2019-09-27 Thread Chris Jones
rote: On Fri, Sep 27, 2019 at 7:07 AM Chris Jones <mailto:jon...@hep.phy.cam.ac.uk>> wrote: what does xcrun --show-sdk-path give you ? /Applications/Xcode.app/Contents/Developer/Platforms/MacOSX.platform/Developer/SDKs/MacOSX.sdk On 27/09/2019 12:04 pm, Carlo Tambuatco

Re: py36-pyqt5 Failed to determine details of Qt installation.

2019-09-27 Thread Chris Jones
what does xcrun --show-sdk-path give you ? On 27/09/2019 12:04 pm, Carlo Tambuatco wrote: I filed a ticket on this issue already and included a logfile for it, but I thought there's no harm in asking the mailing list for a quick solution... I upgraded to macports 2.6.0 today. During a

Re: Failed to install libgcc9: no destroot found

2019-09-27 Thread Chris Jones
yesterday. Thanks, Vahid On Sep 26, 2019, at 9:49 PM, Chris Jones <mailto:jon...@hep.phy.cam.ac.uk>> wrote: sudo port upgrade outdated

Re: Failed to install libgcc9: no destroot found

2019-09-26 Thread Chris Jones
From your log file nfo:activate x ./opt/local/include/gcc/c++/decimal/decimal.h :error:activate Failed to activate libgcc9: Image error: /opt/local/lib/libgcc/libatomic.1.dylib is being used by the active libgcc port. Please deactivate this port first, or use 'port -f activate libgcc9' to

Re: MacPorts 2.6 - Leopard 20.6 and libgcc8

2019-09-26 Thread Chris Jones
> On 27 Sep 2019, at 12:50 am, Ken Cunningham > wrote: > > If we’re talking about a 2.6.1, please look at incorporating this 10.6.8 fix > The best way to achieve that I guess would be to open a second PR that cherry picks the commit,

Re: MacPorts 2.6 - Leopard 20.6 and libgcc8

2019-09-26 Thread Chris Jones
> On 27 Sep 2019, at 12:39 am, Chris Jones wrote: > >  > > >>> On 27 Sep 2019, at 12:34 am, Ryan Schmidt wrote: >>> >>  >> >>> On Sep 26, 2019, at 18:28, Riccardo Mottola wrote: >>> >>> Hi, >>> >&g

Re: MacPorts 2.6 - Leopard 20.6 and libgcc8

2019-09-26 Thread Chris Jones
> On 27 Sep 2019, at 12:34 am, Ryan Schmidt wrote: > >  > >> On Sep 26, 2019, at 18:28, Riccardo Mottola wrote: >> >> Hi, >> >> Ryan Schmidt wrote: I suppose this is an important fix for 10.5 user, we soon need a 2.6.1 >>> The list of compiler dependencies is kept in 2 places: in the

Re: MacPorts 2.6 - Leopard 20.6 and libgcc8

2019-09-26 Thread Chris Jones
> On 27 Sep 2019, at 12:29 am, Riccardo Mottola > wrote: > > Hi, > > Ryan Schmidt wrote: >>> I suppose this is an important fix for 10.5 user, we soon need a 2.6.1 >> The list of compiler dependencies is kept in 2 places: in the ports tree, >> and also in MacPorts base. Chris updated both

Re: MacPorts 2.6 - Leopard 20.6 and libgcc8

2019-09-26 Thread Chris Jones
> On 27 Sep 2019, at 12:13 am, Riccardo Mottola > wrote: > > Hi! > > Chris Jones wrote: >> https://github.com/macports/macports-ports/commit/2e46a05404462e04930b612ed29d9f08ece64603 >> >> I have no way though to test the logic on an OS as ancient

Re: MacPorts 2.6 - Leopard 20.6 and libgcc8

2019-09-26 Thread Chris Jones
https://github.com/macports/macports-ports/commit/2e46a05404462e04930b612ed29d9f08ece64603 I have no way though to test the logic on an OS as ancient as 10.5 > On 26 Sep 2019, at 10:31 pm, Christopher Jones > wrote: > > Hi, > > Hmm, yeah. Now I look at that again its clear the deps are

Re: MacPorts 2.6 - Leopard 20.6 and libgcc8

2019-09-25 Thread Chris Jones
what OS is that on ? yes, on 10.6 and newer I would expect to see that, but on 10.5 it shouldn't be the case. Chris i.e. see line 43 in https://github.com/macports/macports-ports/blob/master/lang/gcc7/Portfile and then line 216. The depends_run on libgcc8 is only set for Darwin 10 or

Re: MacPorts 2.6 - Leopard 20.6 and libgcc8

2019-09-25 Thread Chris Jones
On 25/09/2019 7:55 am, Joshua Root wrote: (forgot to include the list on first sending, apologies for duplicate message) Chris Jones wrote: Indeed, gcc8 is not supported on 10.5 or older, and likely will never be. What is requiring you to use libgcc8 ? libgcc7, apparently: % port deps

Re: MacPorts 2.6 - Leopard 20.6 and libgcc8

2019-09-24 Thread Chris Jones
Hi, Indeed, gcc8 is not supported on 10.5 or older, and likely will never be. What is requiring you to use libgcc8 ? You should instead be using libgcc7 on that platform. Note this is what the libgcc port is there for, to set up this dependency correctly.

Re: [mysql8] compile failure on 10.6.8 x86_64

2019-09-15 Thread Chris Jones
Mails to this list like this are not the correct way to make bug reports, so please stop doing this. Instead please file tickets in trac. > On 16 Sep 2019, at 12:57 am, Bjarne D Mathiesen > wrote: > > version:1 > :debug:sysinfo Mac OS X 10.6 (darwin/10.8.0) arch i386 > :debug:sysinfo

Re: rspamd binaries fail with illegal instruction 4:

2019-09-12 Thread Chris Jones
Hi, It might be interesting to see exactly what cpu capabilities are support on the build bots. Could you run sysctl -a | grep machdep.cpu.features On them, and post what it gives ? Chris > On 12 Sep 2019, at 7:46 pm, Ryan Schmidt wrote: > > > >> On Sep 9, 2019, at 02:32, Horst Simon

Re: rspamd binaries fail with illegal instruction 4:

2019-09-09 Thread Chris Jones
long as I have a working one. > > Thanks and Regards, > Horst > >> On 09 Sep 2019, at 23:21, Chris Jones wrote: >> >> >> what does >> >> sysctl -a | grep machdep.cpu.features >> >> give on the machine with the issues ? Does it list

Re: rspamd binaries fail with illegal instruction 4:

2019-09-09 Thread Chris Jones
the tar file and try with AVX disabled. I tried it on my iMac 2017 macOS 10.14.6 and it works fine on this one. Regards, *Horst Simon* On 09 Sep 2019, at 21:47, Chris Jones <mailto:jon...@hep.phy.cam.ac.uk>> wrote: On 09/09/2019 12:35 pm, Horst Simon wrote: Thanks for th

Re: rspamd binaries fail with illegal instruction 4:

2019-09-09 Thread Chris Jones
If you have received this communication in error, notify us immediately by telephone and (i) destroy this message if a facsimile or (ii) delete this message immediately if this is an electronic communication. On 9 Sep 2019, at 20:57, Chris Jones <mailto:jon...@hep.phy.cam.ac.uk>> wrote

Re: rspamd binaries fail with illegal instruction 4:

2019-09-09 Thread Chris Jones
The first thing to do is check the buildbot logs, to see if you can work out what CPU feature the builds are enabling, and then proceed from there. https://ports.macports.org/port/rspamd/builds from the 10.13 configure step -- Performing Test HAVE_AVX2_C_COMPILER -- Performing Test

Re: rspamd binaries fail with illegal instruction 4:

2019-09-09 Thread Chris Jones
On 09/09/2019 11:17 am, Steven Smith wrote: I installed rspamd on macOS High Sierra Version 10.13.6, it build and installed oh, but when starting rspamd it fails with illegal instruction 4:, the same for rspamadm command. Anyone hs this successful running? I have rspamd running flawlessly

Re: Unable to compile OpenBLAS on 10.7

2019-09-07 Thread Chris Jones
You should always check for open tickets. https://ports.macports.org/port/OpenBLAS/tickets See 58832 > On 7 Sep 2019, at 9:48 pm, Riccardo Mottola via macports-users > wrote: > > Hi all! > > > I am doing a thorough complete update of my systems, I read about the > compiler changes et. al

Re: [port sync] syncing only one tree

2019-09-06 Thread Chris Jones
Hi, The simplest solution, in my opinion, is to just have a single entry in sources.conf which is a complete clone of the macports ports repo. Then just make that the only and only (default) entry Chris On 06/09/2019 9:14 am, Bjarne D Mathiesen wrote: I've got these in my sources.conf

Re: boost upgrade from 1.70.0_0 to 1.71.0_0 does not trigger ledger rebuilt

2019-09-02 Thread Chris Jones
Is it a bug in ledger port file that ledger does not detect upgrade of boost? Should I better report it in trac? Or is there a different way of going through boost upgrade? I encountered this yesterday myself, with exactly the same results that you describe. I filed a ticket on this at

Re: Can't compile `lilypond-devel`

2019-09-02 Thread Chris Jones
On 02/09/2019 2:33 pm, Mojca Miklavec wrote: On Mon, 2 Sep 2019 at 15:18, Ken Cunningham wrote: It's correct base behavior. Base sees a port compiled against libstdc++ on a system configured to use libc++, and knows this is most often bad, and needs to be fixed. So it flags this as an

Re: port upgrade outdated fails

2019-08-27 Thread Chris Jones
gcc9 default the default when it was release, last year. Its up to you what you do here. either use gcc8, or gcc9. not a mixture of both. Chris If the port was built with the gcc8 variant, ‘port upgrade outdated’ shouldn’t change that. Doesn’t make sense. That is exactly the problem.

Re: port upgrade outdated fails

2019-08-27 Thread Chris Jones
Do what it says. Install arpack and mpich-default with the same fortran variants. Most probably you have mpich-default installed with the older gcc8 variant active, so just uninstall it and then reinstall with the new default, which is gcc9. Chris It’s not that simple, there are several

Re: [libgcc8] compile failure on i386 on 10.6 Snow

2019-08-27 Thread Chris Jones
On 27/08/2019 1:31 pm, Ken Cunningham wrote: that is a 32 bit error that is usually suppressed by passing "-read_only_relocs suppress"' to the linker, IIRC. Why are you seeing it, though, I wonder? I don't think anyone has likely tried to build libgcc8 32bit on 10.6.8 with clang-8.0...

Re: [cxx_stdlib] libc++ setting not respected

2019-08-27 Thread Chris Jones
On 27/08/2019 11:46 am, Bjarne D Mathiesen wrote: I've got this in macports.conf : cxx_stdlib libc++ buildfromsourcealways default_compilers macports-clang-8.0 macports-clang-7.0 macports-clang-3.9 macports-clang-3.7 gcc-4.2 apple-gcc-4.2 gcc-4.0 but gperf @3.1+universal

Re: port upgrade outdated fails

2019-08-27 Thread Chris Jones
On 27/08/2019 12:36 am, Mark Brethen wrote: --->  Computing dependencies for arpack --->  Fetching distfiles for arpack Warning: Your DNS servers incorrectly claim to know the address of nonexistent hosts. This may cause checksum mismatches for some ports. See this page for more

Re: How do I merge my own fork with updates from the main fork

2019-08-24 Thread Chris Jones
> On 24 Aug 2019, at 3:47 pm, Ryan Schmidt wrote: > > > >> On Aug 24, 2019, at 07:55, Gerben Wierda wrote: >> >> I have been trying to follow instructions but I am trying to prevent to have >> to become a git expert (there is insufficient time for that available, such >> as studying a

Re: How do I merge my own fork with updates from the main fork

2019-08-24 Thread Chris Jones
Hi, B.t.w. Its very much bad practise to make new commits directly to the master branch of your own fork. You should keep your master clean and only pull into it from the primary macports master, using the commands I just sent around. If you wish to make new commits, for each in order to

Re: How do I merge my own fork with updates from the main fork

2019-08-24 Thread Chris Jones
> On 24 Aug 2019, at 11:32 am, miniupnp wrote: > > Hello, > > Well, it looks like you have added 6 commits in you master branch. > $ git status > should tell you that. > Merging upstream/master doesn't remove theses commits. > It just "merges" new commits from the upstream/master branch into

Re: problem with fresh MacPorts install on 10.13

2019-08-23 Thread Chris Jones
via macports-users wrote: On Aug 23, 2019, at 11:20 AM, Chris Jones <mailto:jon...@hep.phy.cam.ac.uk>> wrote: port sync is what fetches in updates from the main repository. If you don't run this you will never get any port updates, so you should get into the habit of doing it per

Re: problem with fresh MacPorts install on 10.13

2019-08-23 Thread Chris Jones
installed ports. Chris On 23/08/2019 3:58 pm, Noam Bernstein wrote: On Aug 23, 2019, at 10:55 AM, Chris Jones wrote: what does running sudo port -d sync give ? That does seem to have fixed it. I had no idea about that command. Do you want to see the output, or is this probably just some

  1   2   3   >