On 03.11.16 01:06, Rainer Müller wrote:
> For sender domains with a strict DMARC policy (p=reject or
> p=quarantine), the From address will be rewritten to the list
> address and the original sender will be in Reply-To.
This implies that you'll need SPF to pass for the mailing list's domain
if
On 2016-11-03 00:33, Ralph Seichter wrote:
> On 03.11.16 00:23, Ryan Schmidt wrote:
>
>> The new mailing list server uses an updated version of mailman that is
>> supposed to handle this problem without the need to remove the email
>> footers.
>
> If the sender signs message bodies and mailman
On 03.11.16 00:23, Ryan Schmidt wrote:
> The new mailing list server uses an updated version of mailman that is
> supposed to handle this problem without the need to remove the email
> footers.
If the sender signs message bodies and mailman modifies the bodies, DKIM
signatures should, by design,
On 02.11.16 23:58, Gabriel Rosenkoetter wrote:
> I may be mistaken, but doesn't passing mail through an intermediate
> mailing list (not just normal STMP routing) inherently invalidate your
> source SMTP server's DKIM signature?
No, it does not, if the mailing list is configured correctly. DKIM
On 02 Nov, 2016, at 16:48 CST, Ralph Seichter wrote:
> On 02.11.16 23:24, Rainer Müller wrote:
>> as part of the move off of macOS forge, we will migrate the mailing
>> lists to the new mail server.
> While you are working on the ML anyway: can you please change list
>
On 02.11.16 23:24, Rainer Müller wrote:
> as part of the move off of macOS forge, we will migrate the mailing
> lists to the new mail server.
While you are working on the ML anyway: can you please change list
settings to *not* add footer information to mail bodies or modify
subject lines. These