Re: Is anyone successfully using lout on Sierra?

On Aug 11, 2017, at 01:21, Barrie Stott wrote: > I don’t remember having a problem with the lout port until I moved to Sierra. > Now all my ports are fine except lout. Could you be more specific about what doesn't work?

port:openal(-soft) vs. OpenAL.framework?

Hi, Some of you may have seen that I've uploaded an update to port:openal-soft to trac, bringing the port to the current v1.18.1 . I've also filed a ticket for a build conflict in Qt5's QtMultiMedia component, which is supposed to build against the system OpenAL.framework but which picks up

Re: Is anyone successfully using lout on Sierra?

indeed, without the full log cant tell what is wrong. Best, K > On Aug 11, 2017, at 10:41 AM, Barrie Stott wrote: > >> On 11 Aug 2017, at 08:52, Ryan Schmidt wrote: >> >>> On Aug 11, 2017, at 01:21, Barrie Stott wrote: >>> >>> I don’t remember

Is anyone successfully using lout on Sierra?

I don’t remember having a problem with the lout port until I moved to Sierra. Now all my ports are fine except lout. Barrie.

Re: Is anyone successfully using lout on Sierra?

> On 11 Aug 2017, at 09:50, Ken Cunningham > wrote: > > indeed, without the full log cant tell what is wrong. > > Best, K Sorry about that. Here is the full log. Barrie. main.log Description: Binary data > On Aug 11, 2017, at 10:41 AM, Barrie Stott

Apache 2.4 any time soon?

I see that Apache 2.2 officially hit EOL as of the latest release (7/11/17). Any chance we'll see an Apache 2.4 for production in MacPorts in the near future? thanks -- Bill Christensen http://SustainableSources.com http://LinkedIn.com/in/billc108

Re: Is anyone successfully using lout on Sierra?

On 2017-08-11, at 2:14 AM, Barrie Stott wrote: >> On 11 Aug 2017, at 09:50, Ken Cunningham >> wrote: >> >> indeed, without the full log cant tell what is wrong. >> >> Best, K > > Sorry about that. Here is the full log. > > Barrie. > First of all, the port